Moby Arena · at Colorado St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CSU 81–64 · win probability CSU 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CSU has more of the edges
IDHO 1, CSU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
IDHO offense vs CSU defense
Offense 253rd of 366 against a defense 61st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
IDHO has played the 262nd-hardest schedule, CSU the 96th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CSU offense vs IDHO defense
Offense 103rd of 366 against a defense 233rd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: IDHO 34.6, CSU 39.4. Allowed: IDHO 38.5, CSU 34.2
Three-pointers
IDHO hits 34.1% and allows 35.2%; CSU hits 38.6% and allows 34.2%. Threes are 47.0% and 49.1% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: IDHO plays 69.4 a game (153rd fastest), CSU 64.4 (355th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IDHO 15.0%, CSU 18.5%. Forced: IDHO 15.0%, CSU 15.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IDHO 23%, CSU 67%. Transfers in: IDHO 3, CSU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
CSU at home. This season: CSU 0-0 at home, IDHO 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IDHO 28.4%, CSU 30.0%. Defensive: IDHO 75.8%, CSU 70.8%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: IDHO 51.4 and allows 50.5; CSU 57.5 and allows 52.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CSU -16.1 | — |
| Total | — | 145.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | IDHO 64.4 · CSU 80.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CSU -9.4 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | IDHO 29.2 · CSU 38.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Idaho
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 83-81 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-75 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-64 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-94 | -1.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-58 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-81 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 65-80 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-80 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 63-64 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-89 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-67 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 83-91 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 66-73 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 72-83 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-69 | -6.5 | W +23.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 67-77 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 86-80 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 78-58 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-76 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 85-81 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 68-45 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-74 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 81-68 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-78 | +24.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−2.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
+12.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
−27.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
+20.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+8.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
−3.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
+1.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−8.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
−3.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−10.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+1.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
+6.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
−0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−4.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
−5.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
+11.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−4.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−3.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
−16.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+23.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−6.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+1.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
+9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−11.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+7.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
+16.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+2.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+11.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
+7.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−6.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−3.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−6.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
−17.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
+7.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
−3.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+17.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
+0.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
−4.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−23.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
+6.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−2.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+36.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
−16.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
+0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−10.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
+18.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
−5.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−8.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−11.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
+1.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+21.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−1.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+2.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−13.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+14.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
−45.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+8.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+0.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
−4.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−12.5
over 14under 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Colorado St
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1555%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-64 | -10.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 97-74 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 93-79 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 80-67 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 81-83 | -18.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 76-70 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 83-68 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 91-86 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 76-55 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 58-100 | +10.5 | L −31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-60 | +6.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 70-62 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 69-79 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 73-79 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-52 | -19.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 61-65 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 50-73 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 57-68 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-57 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-74 | -16.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-68 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-86 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-74 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 74-70 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-73 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 82-74 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-78 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-71 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 64-69 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UIW
W 98-64
+23.5
9
vs
OMA
W 97-74
+8.5
12
vs
CP
W 93-79
−4.5
16
@
LUC
W 80-67
+9.5
21
vs
DEN
L 81-83
−20.5
26
vs
VT
L 64-66
+2.5
27
vs
WICH
W 76-70
+4.5
28
vs
USF
W 83-68
+17.5
6
vs
COLO
W 91-86
+3.5
9
vs
DART
W 76-55
+0.5
20
@
USU
L 58-100
−31.5
30
vs
NEV
L 62-75
−14.5
3
@
GCU
W 70-60
+16.5
6
vs
UNM
L 70-80
−8.5
9
vs
UNLV
W 70-62
+1.5
13
@
FRES
L 69-79
−13.5
16
@
BOIS
L 73-79
−0.5
20
vs
AF
W 81-52
+9.5
23
vs
USU
L 61-65
+1.5
28
@
SDSU
L 50-73
−13.5
31
@
WYO
L 57-68
−9.5
7
vs
SJSU
W 65-57
−7.5
10
@
AF
W 91-74
+0.5
14
vs
WYO
W 79-68
+7.5
18
@
UNLV
W 91-86
+7.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 83-74
+12.5
24
vs
FRES
W 74-70
−4.5
28
@
SJSU
W 85-73
+7.5
4
@
UNM
W 82-74
+16.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 67-78
−12.5
11
vs
FRES
W 67-63
−3.5
12
vs
SDSU
L 62-71
−2.5
18
vs
JOES
L 64-69
−10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UIW
W 98-64
+14.5
9
vs
OMA
W 97-74
+17.5
12
vs
CP
W 93-79
+6.5
16
@
LUC
W 80-67
−4.5
21
vs
DEN
L 81-83
+14.5
26
vs
VT
L 64-66
−23.5
27
vs
WICH
W 76-70
+3.5
28
vs
USF
W 83-68
−4.5
6
vs
COLO
W 91-86
+27.5
9
vs
DART
W 76-55
−22.5
20
@
USU
L 58-100
+10.5
30
vs
NEV
L 62-75
−2.5
3
@
GCU
W 70-60
−13.5
6
vs
UNM
L 70-80
+6.5
9
vs
UNLV
W 70-62
−19.5
13
@
FRES
L 69-79
+8.5
16
@
BOIS
L 73-79
+11.5
20
vs
AF
W 81-52
−0.5
23
vs
USU
L 61-65
−23.5
28
@
SDSU
L 50-73
−16.5
31
@
WYO
L 57-68
−17.5
7
vs
SJSU
W 65-57
−16.5
10
@
AF
W 91-74
+27.5
14
vs
WYO
W 79-68
+6.5
18
@
UNLV
W 91-86
+29.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 83-74
+17.5
24
vs
FRES
W 74-70
−5.5
28
@
SJSU
W 85-73
+6.5
4
@
UNM
W 82-74
+5.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 67-78
+1.5
11
vs
FRES
W 67-63
−16.5
12
vs
SDSU
L 62-71
−9.5
18
vs
JOES
L 64-69
−11.5
over 17under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Colorado St has the better starters
Position by position: Idaho 0, Colorado St 3, even 2
IdahoBetterColorado St
G K. Gonzalez18 pts · 1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Menard TR12.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 79
G R. Lafferty TR0.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Pascarelli10.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 64
G M. Klapper2.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 35
→CSUSmall
G J. Butler9.4 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 67
F H. Ward TR5 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 35
→CSUBig
F K. Jorgensen11.5 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 87
F S. Joba4.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 25
→CSUBig
F C. Booth10.7 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
IdahoBetterColorado St
IDHO offense253rd of 366 · -7.6
→CSUBig
CSU defense61st of 366 · +1.2
IDHO defense233rd of 366 · -6.2
→CSUBig
CSU offense103rd of 366 · -1.2
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
→CSUBig
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 2 players
→CSUBig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestIDHO betterCSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Gonzalez18 minR. Lafferty13 min · TRM. Klapper12 minK. Wynott10 min · TRB. KennisonNewT. WalNew
Forwards
H. Ward19 min · TRS. Joba17 minD. Trejo-DelgadoNewM. DiaoNewW. JensonNewN. Newman-GomezNew
Guards
J. Menard29 min · TRJ. Pascarelli27 minJ. Butler26 minJ. McIver12 minR. SawyerNewP. DunsonNew
Forwards
K. Jorgensen26 minC. Booth25 minR. Mbemba18 minC. Dortch2 minA. MillerNewD. TedeschiNew
Centers
J. ClarkNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.8 #147 | Points per game | 74.8 #169 |
| 1.10 #145 | Points per possession | 1.16 #44 |
| 69.4 #153 | Pace (possessions) | 64.4 #355 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #177 | Effective FG% | 57.5 #12 |
| 34.1 #168 | 3-point % | 38.6 #9 |
| 47.0 #34 | 3-point attempt rate | 49.1 #19 |
| 34.6 #193 | Free throw rate | 39.4 #69 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #69 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #298 |
| 28.4 #250 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.0 #198 |
| 11.4 #313 | Assists per game | 15.6 #62 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.1 #157 | Points allowed | 71.6 #95 |
| 1.06 #112 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #241 |
| 50.5 #128 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #263 |
| 35.2 #264 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.2 #196 |
| 15.0 #288 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #255 |
| 75.8 #5 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #123 |
| 5.6 #282 | Steals per game | 5.2 #320 |
| 2.4 #319 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #338 |
Idaho
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Houston47–78
- Wvs Montana77–66
- Wvs E Washington81–68
- Wvs Montana St78–74
- Wvs Sacramento St68–45
A week or more of rest.
Colorado St
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Joseph's64–69
- Lvs San Diego St62–71
- Wvs Fresno St67–63
- Lvs Boise St67–78
- W@ New Mexico82–74
A week or more of rest.