PPG Paints Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | RMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DUQ 77–72 · win probability DUQ 67%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DUQ has more of the edges
DUQ 4, RMU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
DUQ hits 33.1% and allows 36.2%; RMU hits 38.0% and allows 33.2%. Threes are 44.4% and 40.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
DUQ has played the 108th-hardest schedule, RMU the 280th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: DUQ 38.3, RMU 28.0. Allowed: DUQ 39.9, RMU 40.1
Shooting
Effective FG%: DUQ 52.3 and allows 52.5; RMU 54.9 and allows 50.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DUQ 30.4%, RMU 37.5%. Defensive: DUQ 70.4%, RMU 71.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DUQ 17.6%, RMU 18.6%. Forced: DUQ 18.4%, RMU 15.8%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: DUQ plays 70.4 a game (99th fastest), RMU 67.5 (256th). Faster games mean more points
DUQ offense vs RMU defense
Offense 107th of 366 against a defense 183rd, on the model’s ratings
RMU offense vs DUQ defense
Offense 179th of 366 against a defense 118th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DUQ 49%, RMU 32%. Transfers in: DUQ 5, RMU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DUQ -4.9 | — |
| Total | — | 149.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | DUQ 77.1 · RMU 72.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DUQ -3.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | DUQ 36.4 · RMU 33.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Duquesne
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-63 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-80 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-81 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 77-87 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 86-93 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-75 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-86 | +14.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-59 | -19.5 | W +24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 89-83 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 80-93 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-97 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 65-71 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-63 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 79-87 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-65 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-86 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-61 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-67 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-91 | +13.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-77 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+2.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
−0.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
−6.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
−0.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
−14.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−9.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
−0.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−7.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+2.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+24.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+8.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
−7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
−8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−3.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
+9.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
+4.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
+6.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
−11.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
+12.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
+14.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+3.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
+6.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−10.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−5.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−14.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
−1.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−9.5
7
vs
RICH
W 79-77
−2.5
12
vs
URI
W 67-61
+4.5
13
vs
VCU
L 66-71
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+6.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
+14.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
+5.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+12.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
+19.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
+31.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−8.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
+8.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−0.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+1.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+18.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+21.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
+7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
+37.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−16.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
−8.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
−7.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
−22.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
+15.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
−9.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
−7.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+15.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
−1.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−22.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−4.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−19.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
+6.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−27.5
7
vs
RICH
W 79-77
+8.5
12
vs
URI
W 67-61
−10.5
13
vs
VCU
L 66-71
−16.5
over 16under 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Robert Morris
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 69-101 | +22.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 81-79 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 61-75 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-74 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 61-54 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-62 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-74 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-70 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 79-70 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 73-96 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 74-79 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 93-96 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-89 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-76 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-71 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-58 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-66 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-66 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 85-68 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 93-69 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 81-68 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-62 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-64 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 68-53 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
−9.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+9.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−2.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
+1.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+15.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−1.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
+6.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+0.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
+2.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
+6.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+0.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
−4.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
−0.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+4.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
−21.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
−9.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
−8.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+10.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+7.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−10.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
+7.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
−9.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
+7.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
+9.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
+13.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+22.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+17.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
+2.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
+6.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
+11.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
+33.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+8.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−10.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
−7.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+10.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−37.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
−0.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+17.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
−7.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
−9.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+16.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
+3.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
+6.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+13.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
+7.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
+6.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
+28.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+27.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+11.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−4.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
−30.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
+8.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
−9.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
−5.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
−1.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+5.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+2.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
−15.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
−10.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
−22.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−12.5
over 16under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Duquesne 2, Robert Morris 2, even 1
DuquesneBetterRobert Morris
G T. Guinyard16.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 93
←DUQSmall
G A. Valentine TR12 pts · 4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 71
G J. Smith TR15.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 63
←DUQBig
G D. Livingston9.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
G B. Hall3.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 6
→RMUSmall
G T. Smith6.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
G J. DiMichele3.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
→RMUBig
F J. Dunkley TR12.4 pts · 6.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F Y. Berman12.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 49
=Even
F K. Ugwuakazi TR5.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 63
DuquesneBetterRobert Morris
DUQ offense107th of 366 · -1.6
←DUQSmall
RMU defense183rd of 366 · -4.2
DUQ defense118th of 366 · -1.8
←DUQSmall
RMU offense179th of 366 · -5.5
Backcourt+0.1 · 4 players
←DUQSmall
Backcourt-2.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
→RMUSmall
Frontcourt+1.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.1 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestDUQ betterRMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Guinyard34 minJ. Smith27 min · TRB. Hall19 minJ. DiMichele14 minI. Pasha8 min · TRE. Anish2 min
Forwards
Y. Berman29 minK. Konan8 min · TRS. Olowoniyi5 min · TRF. JellumNewZ. OwinjeNewC. GalbutNew
Centers
E. Demir9 min · TR
Guards
A. Valentine33 min · TRD. Livingston26 minT. Smith19 minK. Garris16 min · TRE. Cooke9 minL. SloaneNew
Forwards
J. Dunkley29 min · TRK. Ugwuakazi19 min · TRS. Obenjo9 minD. StolbetskiyNewB. OderinloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.9 #118 | Points per game | 76.8 #122 |
| 1.09 #164 | Points per possession | 1.14 #67 |
| 70.4 #99 | Pace (possessions) | 67.5 #256 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.3 #131 | Effective FG% | 54.9 #39 |
| 33.1 #223 | 3-point % | 38.0 #18 |
| 44.4 #81 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.7 #154 |
| 38.3 #94 | Free throw rate | 28.0 #343 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #243 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #305 |
| 30.4 #184 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.5 #11 |
| 14.7 #107 | Assists per game | 17.6 #13 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.9 #214 | Points allowed | 73.4 #139 |
| 1.08 #171 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #174 |
| 52.5 #241 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #100 |
| 36.2 #314 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.2 #135 |
| 18.4 #83 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #230 |
| 70.4 #142 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #98 |
| 7.6 #71 | Steals per game | 5.5 #292 |
| 3.0 #214 | Blocks per game | 2.5 #308 |
Duquesne
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU66–71
- Wvs Rhode Island67–61
- Wvs Richmond79–77
- L@ Rhode Island52–64
- L@ Saint Louis76–91
A week or more of rest.
Robert Morris
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Detroit Mercy64–70
- Wvs Youngstown St68–53
- Wvs Cleveland St83–64
- Wvs Detroit Mercy73–62
- W@ Wright St81–68
A week or more of rest.