Joel & Diane Bloom Wellness and Events Center · at NJIT
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NJIT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SPU 70–69 · win probability SPU 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SPU has more of the edges
SPU 3, NJIT 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NJIT offense vs SPU defense
Offense 338th of 366 against a defense 182nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SPU 37.0%, NJIT 26.2%. Defensive: SPU 65.3%, NJIT 67.9%
SPU offense vs NJIT defense
Offense 336th of 366 against a defense 250th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SPU 17.7%, NJIT 17.1%. Forced: SPU 20.0%, NJIT 16.1%
Context
Schedule so far
SPU has played the 335th-hardest schedule, NJIT the 282nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
NJIT at home. This season: NJIT 0-0 at home, SPU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: SPU plays 66.1 a game (308th fastest), NJIT 67.9 (235th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SPU 46.4 and allows 48.1; NJIT 46.7 and allows 50.0
Even
Three-pointers
SPU hits 31.0% and allows 32.1%; NJIT hits 30.4% and allows 32.3%. Threes are 38.8% and 40.1% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SPU 35.5, NJIT 33.2. Allowed: SPU 46.4, NJIT 37.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SPU 32%, NJIT 39%. Transfers in: SPU 5, NJIT 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SPU -1.1 | — |
| Total | — | 138.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | SPU 69.8 · NJIT 68.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SPU -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 64.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | SPU 32.8 · NJIT 32 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SPU 2–0 NJITSPU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · SPU has won the last 2 meetings · SPU 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2023-24 | SPU 75 @ NJIT 48 | NJIT +3.5 | SPU W |
| Nov 7, 2022-23 | NJIT 59 @ SPU 73 | SPU -9.5 | SPU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Peter's
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
17-11
61% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-18
36% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-77 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-83 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-78 | +20.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 70-81 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 68-66 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-87 | -3.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-43 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 131.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 68-76 | +20.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 70-66 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 76-63 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-70 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-58 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 77-63 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-67 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 66-58 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-78 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 64-72 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 63-72 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 75-65 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 63-56 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 55-74 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−13.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+3.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
+3.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
−6.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−6.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
−29.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
+2.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
+22.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+12.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
+6.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
+12.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+11.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+10.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
+0.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
+10.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−5.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
+2.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
−10.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+0.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
+6.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
−8.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+5.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−6.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−3.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
+2.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
+11.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−20.5
covered 17didn’t cover 11avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−2.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+38.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
−8.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
+13.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−13.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
+3.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
−3.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
−17.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+3.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
−4.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
−5.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+5.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+3.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
−7.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
−1.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−8.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
−14.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
+22.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+10.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
−0.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
+1.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+15.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−4.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−0.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
−5.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
−13.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−8.5
over 10under 18avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
NJIT
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 72-61 | +14.5 | W +25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 53-74 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-64 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-81 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 43-75 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 67-94 | +34.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 47-104 | +44.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 55-73 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 72-89 | +28.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 70-64 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 49-65 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 52-101 | +32.5 | L −16.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 61-80 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-65 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-64 | +8.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-55 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 74-87 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 77-68 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-77 | +13.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-56 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 67-58 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 63-81 | -3.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 64-70 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 52-69 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 52-91 | +4.5 | L −34.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 60-58 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 10 | @ | L 54-63 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 117 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FOR
W 72-61
+25.5
8
vs
FAIR
L 53-74
−14.5
11
@
L-MD
W 66-64
+12.5
15
vs
FDU
W 93-81
+9.5
18
@
DREX
L 43-75
−18.5
22
@
NAVY
L 70-86
+1.5
24
@
CIN
L 67-94
+7.5
26
@
LOU
L 47-104
−12.5
28
@
EMU
L 55-73
−3.5
5
@
HPU
L 72-89
+11.5
10
vs
NHVN
W 70-64
+8.5
13
vs
SHU
L 49-65
−9.5
22
@
BTLR
L 52-101
−16.5
31
@
PENN
L 61-80
−4.5
3
@
BING
W 73-65
+11.5
8
vs
UNH
W 80-76
+6.5
10
vs
ME
L 70-74
−5.5
15
@
UML
W 73-64
+17.5
19
vs
BRY
W 79-55
+22.5
22
@
UMBC
L 74-87
−6.5
29
@
UALB
W 77-68
+14.5
31
@
UVM
W 79-77
+15.5
5
vs
UML
W 81-56
+23.5
7
vs
BING
W 73-64
+0.5
12
@
UNH
W 76-70
+8.5
14
@
ME
W 67-58
+7.5
19
vs
UALB
L 63-81
−21.5
21
vs
UVM
L 64-70
+0.5
28
@
BRY
L 52-69
−18.5
3
vs
UMBC
L 52-91
−34.5
7
vs
ME
W 60-58
−1.5
10
@
UVM
L 54-63
+1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FOR
W 72-61
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
L 53-74
−18.5
11
@
L-MD
W 66-64
−9.5
15
vs
FDU
W 93-81
+27.5
18
@
DREX
L 43-75
−20.5
22
@
NAVY
L 70-86
+15.5
24
@
CIN
L 67-94
+19.5
26
@
LOU
L 47-104
−7.5
28
@
EMU
L 55-73
−13.5
5
@
HPU
L 72-89
+5.5
10
vs
NHVN
W 70-64
+3.5
13
vs
SHU
L 49-65
−37.5
22
@
BTLR
L 52-101
+3.5
31
@
PENN
L 61-80
−10.5
3
@
BING
W 73-65
−2.5
8
vs
UNH
W 80-76
+18.5
10
vs
ME
L 70-74
+13.5
15
@
UML
W 73-64
−8.5
19
vs
BRY
W 79-55
+1.5
22
@
UMBC
L 74-87
+17.5
29
@
UALB
W 77-68
+5.5
31
@
UVM
W 79-77
+16.5
5
vs
UML
W 81-56
−12.5
7
vs
BING
W 73-64
−3.5
12
@
UNH
W 76-70
+0.5
14
@
ME
W 67-58
−12.5
19
vs
UALB
L 63-81
+1.5
21
vs
UVM
L 64-70
−8.5
28
@
BRY
L 52-69
−17.5
3
vs
UMBC
L 52-91
−0.5
7
vs
ME
W 60-58
−16.5
10
@
UVM
L 54-63
−17.5
over 14under 18avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NJIT has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Peter's 1, NJIT 2, even 2
Saint Peter'sBetterNJIT
G B. Wilson TR9.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 29
→NJITSmall
G D. Bolden12 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 47
G B. Eaton11.2 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 56
←SPUBig
G M. Tatum TR8.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
G E. Perkins4 pts · 3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
→NJITSmall
G Q. Duncan4.4 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 31
G S. Simpson3.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Coffi TR3.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 28
F T. Patterson TR1.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Kelly4.4 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 20
Saint Peter'sBetterNJIT
SPU offense336th of 366 · -11.0
→NJITSmall
NJIT defense250th of 366 · -6.6
SPU defense182nd of 366 · -4.1
←SPUBig
NJIT offense338th of 366 · -11.1
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
→NJITSmall
Backcourt-4.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
←SPUSmall
Frontcourt-2.4 · 2 players
Bench-1.1 · 3 players
←SPUSmall
Bench-3.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSPU betterNJIT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Wilson28 min · TRB. Eaton28 minE. Perkins26 minS. Simpson11 minP. Glassnor6 min · TRK. WalkerNew
Forwards
T. Patterson8 min · TRB. Tshilobo2 min · TRA. WatsonNewX. ThomasNewJ. MathewsNew
Centers
J. Noudjihidi7 min · TR
Guards
D. Bolden30 minM. Tatum26 min · TRQ. Duncan14 minR. Awad13 minB. Stores4 min · TRA. AltobelliNew
Forwards
M. Coffi19 min · TRJ. Kelly16 minB. Oliver10 min · TRZ. Scherler7 minV. VanderstraetenNew
Centers
S. Jimenez-VojnicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.2 #296 | Points per game | 66.2 #344 |
| 1.05 #252 | Points per possession | 0.98 #343 |
| 66.1 #308 | Pace (possessions) | 67.9 #235 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.4 #347 | Effective FG% | 46.7 #342 |
| 31.0 #321 | 3-point % | 30.4 #336 |
| 38.8 #197 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #168 |
| 35.5 #163 | Free throw rate | 33.2 #233 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.7 #251 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #215 |
| 37.0 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.2 #316 |
| 12.5 #253 | Assists per game | 10.5 #350 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #48 | Points allowed | 73.7 #147 |
| 1.04 #78 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #167 |
| 48.1 #39 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #99 |
| 32.1 #68 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.3 #79 |
| 20.0 #23 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #214 |
| 65.3 #330 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #264 |
| 8.8 #13 | Steals per game | 6.3 #204 |
| 3.9 #92 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #197 |
Saint Peter's
16-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield55–74
- W@ Marist63–56
- Wvs Manhattan75–65
- L@ Siena63–72
- L@ Iona64–72
A week or more of rest.
NJIT
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-7 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont54–63
- Wvs Maine60–58
- Lvs UMBC52–91
- L@ Bryant52–69
- Lvs Vermont64–70
A week or more of rest.