Williams Arena at Minges Coliseum · at East Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ECU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ECU 80–62 · win probability ECU 95%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ECU has more of the edges
DSU 2, ECU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
DSU has played the 354th-hardest schedule, ECU the 123rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
DSU offense vs ECU defense
Offense 354th of 366 against a defense 158th, on the model’s ratings
ECU offense vs DSU defense
Offense 142nd of 366 against a defense 307th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: DSU 34.1, ECU 39.2. Allowed: DSU 40.5, ECU 32.2
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DSU plays 66.7 a game (290th fastest), ECU 70.0 (116th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DSU 27.7%, ECU 33.4%. Defensive: DSU 68.0%, ECU 67.5%
Three-pointers
DSU hits 28.4% and allows 33.0%; ECU hits 29.3% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 28.9% and 31.1% of their shots
Home court
ECU at home. This season: ECU 0-0 at home, DSU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DSU 41%, ECU 16%. Transfers in: DSU 1, ECU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: DSU 42.9 and allows 52.9; ECU 46.4 and allows 52.3
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DSU 19.8%, ECU 17.1%. Forced: DSU 19.6%, ECU 16.3%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ECU -18.7 | — |
| Total | — | 142.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | DSU 61.6 · ECU 80.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ECU -11.0 | — |
| 1H total | 66.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | DSU 27.7 · ECU 38.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DSU 0–1 ECUECU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · DSU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023-24 | DSU 50 @ ECU 79 | ECU -12.5 | ECU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Delaware St
27 games played
Straight up
5-22
19% wins
Against the spread
9-18
33% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-19
30% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 65-83 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 43-83 | +26.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 57-68 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 52-65 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 41-97 | +34.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-71 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 59-66 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-72 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 81-76 | +13.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 51-67 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 50-65 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 51-53 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 58-84 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-80 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 64-70 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-65 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 58-75 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 59-91 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 59-61 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 57-56 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 53-59 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−1.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−13.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−5.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−11.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−21.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−0.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
+8.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+10.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+18.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
+1.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
+5.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−10.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
+2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
−17.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
−4.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−4.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
+10.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−19.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
−1.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−7.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
−20.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
−8.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−11.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−5.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
+6.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+8.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−2.5
covered 9didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−6.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−31.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−12.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−13.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−13.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−10.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
−7.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+17.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+17.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
−19.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
−20.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−35.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
−2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
+12.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
+22.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−1.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
−6.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−20.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
+0.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−1.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
+18.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
+6.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−1.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−14.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
−11.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+2.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−19.5
over 8under 19avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
East Carolina
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 92-89 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-87 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-85 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 65-77 | -13.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 56-89 | +19.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-67 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 68-56 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-82 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 54-67 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 74-53 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-99 | +25.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-79 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-75 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 71-82 | +18.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 70-73 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 60-77 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-83 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 76-75 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-72 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-75 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-92 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 56-68 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 82-81 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 66-93 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 83-90 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
−2.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
−9.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−18.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−25.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
−13.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
+1.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−0.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
−11.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−17.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
+1.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
+16.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
−22.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
−7.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−0.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+5.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
+7.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
−4.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−4.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
+14.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
−8.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
+11.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
−5.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+5.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+14.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+4.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−7.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
−3.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
+20.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
−18.5
8
@
UAB
L 83-90
+3.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
+29.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
+15.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−0.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−15.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
+4.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
−19.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−3.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
+20.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−9.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−3.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
−4.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
+5.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
+3.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+21.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
−5.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
+3.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−7.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
−12.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
+19.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
−2.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
+13.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+9.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+13.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+31.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−21.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
+9.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
−0.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
+2.5
8
@
UAB
L 83-90
+21.5
over 16under 14avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Delaware St 0, East Carolina 3, even 2
Delaware StBetterEast Carolina
G R. Moore6.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
=Even
G C. Medley TR10.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 6.2 ast
Score 32
G N. Muhammad TR7.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
→ECUBig
G B. Blaine TR17.7 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 82
G J. St Clair3.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 14
→ECUBig
F K. Watson TR12.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 50
G D. Shepherd4.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 58
→ECUSmall
F K. Cooper TR8.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
F A. Santos6.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
=No call
F J. Woodard3.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Not ranked
Delaware StBetterEast Carolina
DSU offense354th of 366 · -13.2
→ECUBig
ECU defense158th of 366 · -3.4
DSU defense307th of 366 · -7.9
→ECUBig
ECU offense142nd of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt-4.0 · 4 players
→ECUBig
Backcourt-0.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
→ECUSmall
Frontcourt+0.4 · 3 players
Bench-2.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-1.8 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestDSU betterECU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Moore22 minN. Muhammad18 min · TRJ. St Clair15 minD. Shepherd13 minN. ReedusNewI. SullivanNew
Forwards
A. Santos20 minM. Adamu13 minT. HawkinsNewG. EkukwaiNewJ. ObioraNewF. MuntariNew
Guards
C. Medley34 min · TRB. Blaine29 min · TRT. Best6 min · TRA. McCulloughNewM. PandovNew
Forwards
K. Watson32 min · TRK. Cooper26 min · TRJ. Woodard17 minJ. BuchananNewD. QuinnNewD. Creasy-QuirindoongoNew
Centers
E. DeLaurier15 minM. KlitschkoNewM. HintonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.7 #365 | Points per game | 71.5 #259 |
| 0.89 #365 | Points per possession | 1.02 #305 |
| 66.7 #290 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #116 |
| Shooting | ||
| 42.9 #364 | Effective FG% | 46.4 #346 |
| 28.4 #361 | 3-point % | 29.3 #350 |
| 28.9 #357 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.1 #337 |
| 34.1 #204 | Free throw rate | 39.2 #75 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.8 #346 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #208 |
| 27.7 #277 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.4 #79 |
| 9.7 #361 | Assists per game | 11.8 #301 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #89 | Points allowed | 77.7 #262 |
| 1.07 #143 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #246 |
| 52.9 #265 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.3 #229 |
| 33.0 #123 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #245 |
| 19.6 #32 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #205 |
| 68.0 #257 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #282 |
| 7.6 #73 | Steals per game | 6.5 #177 |
| 1.8 #353 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #74 |
Delaware St
5-22 in 2025-26 overall · 3-13 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central53–59
- Wvs Morgan St75–70
- W@ MD Eastern57–56
- Lvs SC State59–61
- Lvs NC Central60–74
A week or more of rest.
East Carolina
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-12 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UAB83–90
- Lvs Tulsa66–93
- Wvs Memphis84–68
- W@ UTSA82–81
- L@ Charlotte56–68
A week or more of rest.