Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SLU 78–76 · win probability SLU 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SLU has more of the edges
GCU 1, SLU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
GCU hits 31.8% and allows 31.9%; SLU hits 39.9% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 38.9% and 45.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: GCU 51.7 and allows 47.4; SLU 59.7 and allows 45.2
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: GCU plays 69.3 a game (166th fastest), SLU 72.1 (32nd). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: GCU 39.5, SLU 33.7. Allowed: GCU 39.0, SLU 37.1
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GCU 17.6%, SLU 17.2%. Forced: GCU 17.4%, SLU 15.9%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GCU 31.3%, SLU 30.7%. Defensive: GCU 74.7%, SLU 72.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GCU 51%, SLU 63%. Transfers in: GCU 9, SLU 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
SLU offense vs GCU defense
Offense 61st of 366 against a defense 78th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
GCU has played the 107th-hardest schedule, SLU the 99th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
GCU offense vs SLU defense
Offense 83rd of 366 against a defense 87th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SLU -2.1 | — |
| Total | — | 153.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | GCU 75.5 · SLU 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SLU -1.1 | — |
| 1H total | 71.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | GCU 35.2 · SLU 36.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
GCU 1–1 SLUSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · GCU 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025-26 | GCU 64 @ SLU 78 | SLU -8.5 | SLU W |
| Dec 22, 2024-25 | SLU 72 @ GCU 73 | GCU -9.5 | SLU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grand Canyon
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
17-15
53% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 90-71 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 81-90 | -15.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 88-59 | -22.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-78 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-72 | -18.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 68-58 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 46-59 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 67-45 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-84 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-61 | -17.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 82-70 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 91-78 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 169.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 60-70 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 75-58 | +8.5 | W +25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-58 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 64-87 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-74 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 68-57 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 60-66 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-57 | -26.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 78-80 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-70 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-79 | -11.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 73-63 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-70 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 80-67 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-74 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 86-60 | -19.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 85-60 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 80-84 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
PFW
W 90-71
+4.5
7
vs
YSU
L 81-90
−24.5
10
vs
NIU
W 88-59
+6.5
15
@
SLU
L 64-78
−5.5
21
vs
NWST
W 85-72
−5.5
25
vs
UTAH
W 68-58
+4.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 46-59
−4.5
2
vs
STET
W 67-45
−2.5
6
vs
OKST
L 78-84
−4.5
13
vs
CCU
W 82-61
+3.5
20
@
WYO
W 82-70
+14.5
22
vs
IUIN
W 91-78
−10.5
3
vs
CSU
L 60-70
−16.5
7
@
BOIS
W 75-58
+25.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 76-58
+1.5
13
@
UNM
L 64-87
−16.5
17
vs
USU
W 84-74
+15.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 70-69
+2.5
24
@
FRES
W 68-57
+6.5
27
@
NEV
L 60-66
−2.5
30
vs
BOIS
W 86-69
+15.5
3
vs
AF
W 81-57
−2.5
7
@
UNLV
L 78-80
−4.5
11
vs
UNM
L 64-70
−7.5
14
@
SJSU
W 94-79
+3.5
17
@
SDSU
W 73-63
+17.5
21
vs
WYO
L 65-70
−12.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 80-67
+5.5
28
@
USU
L 69-74
+4.5
3
@
AF
W 86-60
+6.5
7
vs
FRES
W 85-60
+12.5
12
vs
NEV
L 80-84
−7.5
covered 17didn’t cover 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
PFW
W 90-71
+5.5
7
vs
YSU
L 81-90
+18.5
10
vs
NIU
W 88-59
−16.5
15
@
SLU
L 64-78
−25.5
21
vs
NWST
W 85-72
+9.5
25
vs
UTAH
W 68-58
−27.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 46-59
−38.5
2
vs
STET
W 67-45
−29.5
6
vs
OKST
L 78-84
+6.5
13
vs
CCU
W 82-61
−0.5
20
@
WYO
W 82-70
+4.5
22
vs
IUIN
W 91-78
−0.5
3
vs
CSU
L 60-70
−13.5
7
@
BOIS
W 75-58
−7.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 76-58
−7.5
13
@
UNM
L 64-87
+4.5
17
vs
USU
W 84-74
+7.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 70-69
−6.5
24
@
FRES
W 68-57
−20.5
27
@
NEV
L 60-66
−17.5
30
vs
BOIS
W 86-69
+13.5
3
vs
AF
W 81-57
+0.5
7
@
UNLV
L 78-80
+9.5
11
vs
UNM
L 64-70
−14.5
14
@
SJSU
W 94-79
+33.5
17
@
SDSU
W 73-63
−3.5
21
vs
WYO
L 65-70
−9.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 80-67
−3.5
28
@
USU
L 69-74
−4.5
3
@
AF
W 86-60
+2.5
7
vs
FRES
W 85-60
−4.5
12
vs
NEV
L 80-84
+26.5
over 13under 19avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Louis
34 games played
Straight up
28-6
82% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-17
50% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-67 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 108-86 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 109-66 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -19.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 71-70 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 77-78 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 91-70 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 107-65 | -24.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-75 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 112-53 | -26.5 | W +32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 93-79 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 102-79 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-72 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 78-56 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-63 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 97-62 | -8.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 102-71 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 91-82 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-58 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 86-59 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-77 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-76 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 79-65 | -21.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-86 | -7.5 | L −36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 88-81 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 102-77 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 167.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 72-95 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
−8.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+18.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
+5.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
+11.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−0.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−2.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+13.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+17.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
−2.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+32.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
−20.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+3.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
+10.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
−5.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
+4.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
+10.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−4.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
+26.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−7.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
+1.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
+9.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
+5.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+1.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−7.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−36.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+0.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−5.5
19
vs
UGA
W 102-77
+26.5
21
vs
MICH
L 72-95
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
+38.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+9.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
−25.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
−15.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−17.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−5.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+10.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+11.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
+4.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+7.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
+14.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+19.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
−38.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
+3.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
−20.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
−11.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−7.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
−0.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−12.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+21.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
−13.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
−10.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
+5.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
−1.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+6.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−11.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−3.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+10.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−6.5
19
vs
UGA
W 102-77
+11.5
21
vs
MICH
L 72-95
+5.5
over 17under 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Grand Canyon 2, Saint Louis 2, even 1
Grand CanyonBetterSaint Louis
G J. Zimmerman TR15.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 32
→SLUSmall
G Q. Jones9 pts · 3.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 51
G M. Tucker TR13 pts · 2.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 56
→SLUSmall
G T. Green11.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 86
G J. Henley17.7 pts · 5.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 97
=Even
G A. McCottry10.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 84
G M. Williams14 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
←GCUSmall
F I. Sharma9.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 67
F B. Barkley TR14.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 89
←GCUSmall
F A. Michaeli TR7.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 58
Grand CanyonBetterSaint Louis
GCU offense83rd of 366 · +0.4
=Even
SLU defense87th of 366 · -0.1
GCU defense78th of 366 · +0.5
=Even
SLU offense61st of 366 · +2.6
Backcourt+4.6 · 4 players
←GCUSmall
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.0 · 1 player
←GCUSmall
Frontcourt+0.6 · 2 players
Bench+2.6 · 5 players
→SLUSmall
Bench+3.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestGCU betterSLU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Zimmerman33 min · TRM. Tucker32 min · TRJ. Henley32 minM. Williams27 minT. Holloman26 min · TRD. Skillings25 min · TR
Forwards
B. Barkley29 min · TRT. Behrend22 min · TRA. Dickerson22 min · TRO. Biliew20 min · TRJ. SawyerNewJ. WhortonNew
Centers
E. Demirel23 min
Guards
Q. Jones27 minT. Green24 minA. McCottry23 minK. Thames17 minC. Hutson4 minI. Holmes2 min
Forwards
I. Sharma22 minA. Michaeli18 min · TRE. Strong17 min · TRJ. Kerr6 minS. PearsonNewB. DiakiteNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.6 #153 | Points per game | 86.4 #7 |
| 1.09 #158 | Points per possession | 1.20 #14 |
| 69.3 #166 | Pace (possessions) | 72.1 #32 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.7 #162 | Effective FG% | 59.7 #2 |
| 31.8 #286 | 3-point % | 39.9 #2 |
| 38.9 #192 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.1 #64 |
| 39.5 #67 | Free throw rate | 33.7 #221 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #245 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #218 |
| 31.3 #150 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.7 #173 |
| 12.8 #230 | Assists per game | 18.3 #8 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.7 #42 | Points allowed | 71.6 #94 |
| 0.99 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 0.99 #21 |
| 47.4 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.2 #3 |
| 31.9 #60 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.3 #14 |
| 17.4 #129 | Turnovers forced | 15.9 #224 |
| 74.7 #12 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #43 |
| 6.6 #165 | Steals per game | 7.1 #117 |
| 3.6 #123 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #168 |
Grand Canyon
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nevada80–84
- Wvs Fresno St85–60
- W@ Air Force86–60
- L@ Utah State69–74
- Wvs UNLV80–67
A week or more of rest.
Saint Louis
28-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-4 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan72–95
- Wvs Georgia102–77
- Lvs Dayton69–70
- Wvs G Washington88–81
- L@ George Mason57–86
A week or more of rest.