Paycom Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OU 84–81 · win probability OU 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 165.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OU has more of the edges
OKST 1, OU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
OKST hits 33.9% and allows 36.0%; OU hits 36.5% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 35.5% and 43.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: OKST 52.0 and allows 53.1; OU 54.9 and allows 51.0
Free throws
Free throw rate: OKST 39.4, OU 35.5. Allowed: OKST 31.4, OU 34.9
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: OKST plays 74.8 a game (6th fastest), OU 69.4 (154th). Faster games mean more points
OU offense vs OKST defense
Offense 28th of 366 against a defense 99th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: OKST 15.7%, OU 14.3%. Forced: OKST 15.7%, OU 15.5%
Context
Schedule so far
OKST has played the 60th-hardest schedule, OU the 32nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
OKST offense vs OU defense
Offense 23rd of 366 against a defense 51st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: OKST 30.8%, OU 32.8%. Defensive: OKST 69.7%, OU 67.1%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: OKST 41%, OU 43%. Transfers in: OKST 6, OU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OU -2.4 | — |
| Total | — | 165.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | OKST 81.3 · OU 83.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OU -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 77.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | OKST 37.9 · OU 39.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
OKST 4–5 OUOU leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · OU has won the last 4 meetings · OKST 5-3-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | OU 85 vs OKST 76 | OKST +2.5 | OU W |
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | OKST 65 vs OU 80 | OU -3.5 | OU W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | OU 84 @ OKST 82 | OKST -1.5 | OU W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | OKST 62 @ OU 66 | OU -11.5 | OKST W |
| Mar 8, 2022-23 | OU 49 vs OKST 57 | OKST +1.5 | OKST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Oklahoma St
35 games played
Straight up
20-15
57% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1946%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 95-71 | -20.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 87-63 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-67 | -30.5 | L −3.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 85-69 | -20.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 103-95 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 95-81 | -23.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | @ | W 86-81 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 93-83 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-78 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-85 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 91-79 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-89 | -19.5 | L −14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-77 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-102 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 87-76 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-83 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 79-94 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 65-68 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 71-84 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 99-92 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-84 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 76-85 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-81 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-83 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 91-84 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-91 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 111-104 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-82 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 92-83 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 88-95 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 70-96 | -2.5 | L −28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+3.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
+26.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−3.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−4.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+4.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
−9.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
−3.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+4.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−6.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
−15.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
−14.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+5.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
−9.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
+9.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
+7.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
−13.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−1.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
+5.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−2.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
+10.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+15.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−16.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−5.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
−1.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−4.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+5.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
−13.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+6.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+0.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
−2.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ORU
W 95-71
+0.5
9
vs
TA&M
W 87-63
−24.5
12
vs
PV
W 94-67
−7.5
16
vs
AMCC
W 85-69
−0.5
19
vs
USF
W 103-95
+20.5
22
vs
NICH
W 95-81
+20.5
27
@
NU
W 86-81
+7.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 93-83
+6.5
6
vs
GCU
W 84-78
+6.5
13
vs
OU
L 76-85
−8.5
18
vs
KC
W 91-79
+8.5
21
vs
CSUF
W 94-89
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 103-77
+15.5
3
@
TTU
L 80-102
+14.5
6
vs
UCF
W 87-76
−12.5
10
@
ISU
L 71-83
−11.5
13
vs
BAY
L 79-94
+7.5
17
vs
KSU
W 84-83
−8.5
20
@
TCU
L 65-68
−28.5
24
vs
ISU
L 71-84
−7.5
31
@
UTAH
W 81-69
−16.5
4
vs
BYU
W 99-92
+23.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 47-84
−37.5
10
@
ASU
L 76-85
−2.5
14
vs
TCU
L 92-95
+30.5
18
vs
KU
L 69-81
−8.5
21
@
COLO
L 69-83
−10.5
24
vs
WVU
W 91-84
+30.5
28
@
CIN
L 68-91
+7.5
3
@
UCF
W 111-104
+47.5
7
vs
HOU
L 75-82
+5.5
10
vs
COLO
W 92-83
+10.5
11
vs
TCU
L 88-95
+24.5
17
vs
DAV
W 84-80
+9.5
22
vs
WICH
L 70-96
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oklahoma
37 games played
Straight up
21-16
57% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-66 | -31.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 68-83 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 95-69 | -36.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 99-105 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-71 | -24.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 72-53 | -31.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-68 | +4.5 | W +22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 70-86 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-76 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 169.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 89-67 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 107-54 | -31.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 93-69 | -44.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-70 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 53-72 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 76-83 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 79-96 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 81-83 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 177.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 76-85 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 69-79 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 78-94 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 92-91 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 94-78 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 66-89 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 71-75 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 91-79 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 83-67 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 80-64 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-85 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 86-74 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 83-63 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 79-82 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 166.5 | U 161 |
| Apr 1 | vs | W 90-86 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 82-69 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Apr 5 | vs | L 82-89 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SFPA
W 102-66
+4.5
8
@
GONZ
L 68-83
−4.5
11
vs
UAPB
W 95-69
−10.5
15
vs
NEB
L 99-105
−4.5
20
vs
ORU
W 95-71
−0.5
23
vs
ALCN
W 72-53
−12.5
28
vs
MARQ
W 75-74
−0.5
2
@
WAKE
W 86-68
+22.5
6
vs
ASU
L 70-86
−21.5
13
vs
OKST
W 85-76
+6.5
16
vs
KC
W 89-67
−8.5
22
vs
STET
W 107-54
+21.5
29
vs
MVSU
W 93-69
−20.5
3
vs
MISS
W 86-70
+9.5
7
@
MSST
L 53-72
−17.5
10
@
TA&M
L 76-83
−2.5
13
vs
FLA
L 79-96
−9.5
17
vs
ALA
L 81-83
+3.5
20
@
SC
L 76-85
−11.5
24
@
MIZ
L 87-88
+3.5
27
vs
ARK
L 79-83
−0.5
31
vs
TEX
L 69-79
−8.5
4
@
UK
L 78-94
−7.5
7
@
VAN
W 92-91
+12.5
14
vs
UGA
W 94-78
+14.5
18
@
TENN
L 66-89
−11.5
21
vs
TA&M
L 71-75
−2.5
24
vs
AUB
W 91-79
+15.5
28
@
LSU
W 83-67
+17.5
3
vs
MIZ
W 80-64
+17.5
7
@
TEX
W 88-85
+9.5
11
vs
SC
W 86-74
+4.5
12
vs
TA&M
W 83-63
+22.5
13
vs
ARK
L 79-82
+3.5
1
vs
COLO
W 90-86
−5.5
4
vs
BAY
W 82-69
+14.5
5
vs
WVU
L 82-89
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SFPA
W 102-66
+18.5
8
@
GONZ
L 68-83
−15.5
11
vs
UAPB
W 95-69
−4.5
15
vs
NEB
L 99-105
+40.5
20
vs
ORU
W 95-71
−0.5
23
vs
ALCN
W 72-53
−35.5
28
vs
MARQ
W 75-74
−13.5
2
@
WAKE
W 86-68
−5.5
6
vs
ASU
L 70-86
−1.5
13
vs
OKST
W 85-76
−8.5
16
vs
KC
W 89-67
+2.5
22
vs
STET
W 107-54
+12.5
29
vs
MVSU
W 93-69
+8.5
3
vs
MISS
W 86-70
+9.5
7
@
MSST
L 53-72
−33.5
10
@
TA&M
L 76-83
−6.5
13
vs
FLA
L 79-96
+17.5
17
vs
ALA
L 81-83
−13.5
20
@
SC
L 76-85
+10.5
24
@
MIZ
L 87-88
+23.5
27
vs
ARK
L 79-83
−5.5
31
vs
TEX
L 69-79
−7.5
4
@
UK
L 78-94
+19.5
7
@
VAN
W 92-91
+23.5
14
vs
UGA
W 94-78
+7.5
18
@
TENN
L 66-89
+5.5
21
vs
TA&M
L 71-75
−19.5
24
vs
AUB
W 91-79
+12.5
28
@
LSU
W 83-67
−5.5
3
vs
MIZ
W 80-64
−9.5
7
@
TEX
W 88-85
+18.5
11
vs
SC
W 86-74
+10.5
12
vs
TA&M
W 83-63
−16.5
13
vs
ARK
L 79-82
−5.5
1
vs
COLO
W 90-86
+13.5
4
vs
BAY
W 82-69
−8.5
5
vs
WVU
L 82-89
+29.5
over 18under 19avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Oklahoma has the better starters
Position by position: Oklahoma St 0, Oklahoma 1, even 4
Oklahoma StBetterOklahoma
G K. Clary10.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 78
→OUSmall
G B. Edwards TR12.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 93
G K. Natt TR11.3 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 94
=Even
G X. Brown15.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 92
G J. Walker TR11.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 55
=Even
G T. Hendricks TR11.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 60
F J. Burks TR13.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
=Even
F D. Brennan TR12.4 pts · 10.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 95
F P. Fallah14.7 pts · 6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 97
=Even
F D. Reid11.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 84
Oklahoma StBetterOklahoma
OKST offense23rd of 366 · +7.5
=Even
OU defense51st of 366 · +1.9
OKST defense99th of 366 · -0.7
→OUSmall
OU offense28th of 366 · +6.6
Backcourt+4.0 · 3 players
→OUSmall
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt+7.7 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+6.9 · 2 players
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestOKST betterOU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Clary28 minK. Natt27 min · TRJ. Walker26 min · TRL. Bogavac24 min · TRR. Crotty10 minJ. MontonatiNew
Forwards
J. Burks28 min · TRP. Fallah26 minA. Grbovic20 min · TRB. Ahmed13 minM. Ragland6 minL. AllmondNew
Centers
J. Halaifonua20 min · TR
Guards
B. Edwards33 min · TRX. Brown32 minT. Hendricks31 min · TRP. Isaacs22 min · TRD. Forsythe17 minB. MoserNew
Forwards
D. Brennan31 min · TRD. Reid28 minK. Rooths16 min · TRK. Rogers8 minF. KeeffeNewG. MayfieldNew
Centers
Y. Yaak15 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.9 #21 | Points per game | 82.9 #29 |
| 1.12 #110 | Points per possession | 1.19 #23 |
| 74.8 #6 | Pace (possessions) | 69.4 #154 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #144 | Effective FG% | 54.9 #40 |
| 33.9 #176 | 3-point % | 36.5 #41 |
| 35.5 #260 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.6 #97 |
| 39.4 #70 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #161 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.7 #117 | Turnover rate | 14.3 #33 |
| 30.8 #169 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.8 #92 |
| 14.6 #113 | Assists per game | 14.5 #116 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.2 #349 | Points allowed | 77.4 #248 |
| 1.12 #265 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #271 |
| 53.1 #272 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #162 |
| 36.0 #304 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #189 |
| 15.7 #240 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #247 |
| 69.7 #178 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.1 #296 |
| 7.1 #120 | Steals per game | 6.3 #193 |
| 2.7 #285 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #89 |
Oklahoma St
20-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wichita St70–96
- Wvs Davidson84–80
- Lvs TCU88–95
- Wvs Colorado92–83
- Lvs Houston75–82
A week or more of rest.
Oklahoma
21-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Virginia82–89
- Wvs Baylor82–69
- Wvs Colorado90–86
- Lvs Arkansas79–82
- Wvs Texas A&M83–63
A week or more of rest.