Intuit Dome · at Clippers
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 5-1 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAC 119–109 · win probability LAC 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 228.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LAC has more of the edges
MIL 1, LAC 4 · 2026-27 so far
MIL offense vs LAC defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MIL has played the 23rd-hardest schedule, LAC the 10th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MIL 29.7%, LAC 26.5%. Defensive: MIL 74.2%, LAC 70.9%
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: MIL plays 106.2 a game (4th fastest), LAC 101.7 (23rd). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: MIL 23.9, LAC 28.0. Allowed: MIL 29.7, LAC 24.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MIL 15.8%, LAC 20.4%. Forced: MIL 12.2%, LAC 17.0%
Home court
LAC at home. This season: LAC 1-1 at home, MIL 0-2 away
Even
Three-pointers
MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%; LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%. Threes are 45.9% and 42.3% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4; LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9
Even
LAC offense vs MIL defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4; LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MIL 100%, LAC 100%. Transfers in: MIL 0, LAC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAC -9.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model228.1
Model edge—
Projected score
MIL 109.2 · LAC 118.9
Win probability
LAC 76%
1st half
Spread
LAC -5.3
Total
114.2
Projected score
MIL 54.4 · LAC 59.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MIL 6–4 LACMIL leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · LAC has won the last 2 meetings · MIL 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2025-26 | LAC 127 @ MIL 113 | MIL +17.5 | MIL W |
| Mar 23, 2025-26 | MIL 96 @ LAC 129 | LAC -13.5 | LAC W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | LAC 110 @ MIL 116 | MIL +1.5 | MIL W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | MIL 117 @ LAC 127 | LAC -3.5 | LAC W |
| Mar 10, 2023-24 | MIL 124 @ LAC 117 | LAC +6.5 | MIL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clippers has the better starters
Position by position: Bucks 2, Clippers 3, even 0
BucksBetterClippers
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
→LACSmall
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
→LACSmall
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
←MILSmall
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
→LACBig
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
←MILBig
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
BucksBetterClippers
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
→LACBig
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
=Even
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
→LACBig
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
←MILSmall
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
→LACBig
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMIL betterLAC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.0 #17 | Points per game | 106.5 #28 |
| 1.07 #20 | Points per possession | 1.04 #27 |
| 106.2 #4 | Pace (possessions) | 101.7 #23 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #21 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #18 |
| 33.9 #21 | 3-point % | 38.6 #5 |
| 45.9 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.3 #17 |
| 23.9 #25 | Free throw rate | 28.0 #17 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #18 | Turnover rate | 20.4 #30 |
| 29.7 #8 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.5 #21 |
| 26.0 #20 | Assists per game | 24.3 #26 |
| Defense | ||
| 126.2 #28 | Points allowed | 113.8 #15 |
| 1.18 #28 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #22 |
| 55.4 #24 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.9 #28 |
| 34.9 #14 | Opponent 3-point % | 38.2 #26 |
| 12.2 #30 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #8 |
| 74.2 #10 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #20 |
| 5.7 #30 | Steals per game | 11.3 #3 |
| 4.0 #27 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #22 |
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.