United Center · at Bulls
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAC 120–114 · win probability LAC 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 234.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
LAC 2, CHI 2 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%. Threes are 42.3% and 47.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 106 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), CHI 109.8 (1st). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0
Home court
CHI at home. This season: CHI 0-2 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, CHI the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, CHI 29.2%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, CHI 69.8%
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, CHI 38.3. Allowed: LAC 24.7, CHI 33.5
Even
LAC offense vs CHI defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, CHI 16.2%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, CHI 14.7%
Even
CHI offense vs LAC defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, CHI 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, CHI 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAC -5.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model234.2
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 120.1 · CHI 114.1
Win probability
LAC 66%
1st half
Spread
LAC -3.5
Total
117.1
Projected score
LAC 60.3 · CHI 56.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
LAC 6–4 CHILAC leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · LAC 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2025-26 | CHI 108 @ LAC 119 | LAC -13.5 | CHI W |
| Jan 20, 2025-26 | LAC 110 @ CHI 138 | CHI -2.5 | CHI W |
| Feb 26, 2024-25 | LAC 122 @ CHI 117 | CHI +9.5 | CHI W |
| Jan 20, 2024-25 | CHI 112 @ LAC 99 | LAC -5.5 | CHI W |
| Mar 14, 2023-24 | LAC 126 @ CHI 111 | CHI +6.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clippers has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 2, Bulls 1, even 2
ClippersBetterBulls
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→CHIBig
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
=Even
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
←LACSmall
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
←LACBig
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
=Even
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
ClippersBetterBulls
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
=Even
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
=Even
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→CHIBig
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
←LACBig
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
←LACBig
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterCHI betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 113.5 #16 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.04 #26 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 109.8 #1 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 48.2 #30 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 28.1 #30 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #4 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #1 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #20 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #9 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 24.3 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 129.3 #30 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #27 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.0 #26 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 39.3 #28 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #21 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #24 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 8.7 #17 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #12 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.