TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Record | 5-1 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 5-1 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 124–104 · win probability BOS 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 228.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
SAC 0, BOS 8 · 2026-27 so far
SAC offense vs BOS defense
Offense 27th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SAC 51.0 and allows 60.4; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Context
Schedule so far
SAC has played the 8th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
SAC hits 30.4% and allows 39.2%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 38.0% and 45.9% of their shots
BOS offense vs SAC defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SAC 15.9%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: SAC 14.6%, BOS 17.8%
Recent form
Last 5: SAC 1-4 ATS, margin -17.8; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Free throws
Free throw rate: SAC 26.4, BOS 32.3. Allowed: SAC 31.2, BOS 31.7
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: SAC plays 106.0 a game (6th fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, SAC 0-4 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SAC 22.9%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: SAC 73.7%, BOS 68.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SAC 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: SAC 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -19.8
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model228.2
Model edge—
Projected score
SAC 104.2 · BOS 124
Win probability
BOS 92%
1st half
Spread
BOS -11.1
Total
114.3
Projected score
SAC 51.6 · BOS 62.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 0% | 1-5 17% | 5-1 83% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
SAC 1–9 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 3 meetings · SAC 2-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025-26 | SAC 93 @ BOS 112 | BOS -11.5 | BOS W |
| Jan 1, 2025-26 | BOS 120 @ SAC 106 | SAC +10.5 | BOS W |
| Mar 24, 2024-25 | BOS 113 @ SAC 95 | SAC +4.5 | BOS W |
| Jan 10, 2024-25 | SAC 114 @ BOS 97 | BOS -12.5 | SAC W |
| Apr 5, 2023-24 | SAC 100 @ BOS 101 | BOS -9.5 | SAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kings
6 games played
Straight up
0-6
0% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −10.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−19.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+1.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
−7.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
−7.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
−5.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
−23.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −10.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−9.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+16.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
+0.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
+0.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
+17.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
+11.5
over 5under 1avg +6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Kings 0, Celtics 5, even 0
KingsBetterCeltics
G D. Acuff26.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 4
→BOSBig
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
F D. Sabonis16 pts · 15.8 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 26
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F D. Hunter14 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
→BOSBig
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F P. Achiuwa12.5 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
Score 7
→BOSBig
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
F L. Black7.1 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 13
→BOSBig
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
KingsBetterCeltics
SAC offense27th of 30 · -3.0
→BOSBig
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
SAC defense29th of 30 · -7.9
→BOSBig
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt-13.7 · 1 player
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-18.6 · 4 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench-13.2 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSAC betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Acuff37 minE. Sharp18 minD. Plowden14 minM. Monk12 minN. Clifford8 minA. FlaglerNew
Forwards
D. Sabonis37 minD. Hunter29 minP. Achiuwa29 minL. Black29 minJ. Mogbo17 minA. Karaban10 min
Out
Z. LaVineDay-To-DayK. MurrayOut
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 109.3 #22 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.03 #28 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 106.0 #6 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #23 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 30.4 #27 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 38.0 #27 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 26.4 #20 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 22.9 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 24.5 #23 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 128.3 #29 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.21 #29 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 60.4 #30 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 39.2 #27 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 14.6 #22 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 73.7 #12 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 8.0 #21 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 2.3 #30 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Kings
0-6 overall · 0-6 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Grizzlies105–136
- L@ Pelicans120–132
- L@ Spurs103–130
- Lvs Grizzlies112–123
- Lvs Trail Blazers120–128
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.