TD Garden · at Celtics · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 5-1 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 116–106 · win probability BOS 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 222.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
ORL 0, BOS 5 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
ORL has played the 1st-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ORL 17.0%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: ORL 13.6%, BOS 17.8%
ORL offense vs BOS defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ORL 23.4%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: ORL 68.9%, BOS 68.4%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ORL 53.4 and allows 53.0; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, ORL 2-1 away
Context
Tempo
About 102 possessions: ORL plays 101.9 a game (22nd fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: ORL 2-3 ATS, margin -9.4; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ORL 31.7, BOS 32.3. Allowed: ORL 29.8, BOS 31.7
Even
Three-pointers
ORL hits 35.4% and allows 34.6%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 46.5% and 45.9% of their shots
Even
BOS offense vs ORL defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ORL 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: ORL 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -10.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model222.3
Model edge—
Projected score
ORL 106.1 · BOS 116.2
Win probability
BOS 76%
1st half
Spread
BOS -5.6
Total
111.6
Projected score
ORL 53 · BOS 58.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 23 since 2021-22
ORL 8–15 BOSBOS leads · 23 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 4 meetings · ORL 11-12 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026-27 | BOS 108 @ ORL 97 | ORL +6.5 | BOS W |
| Apr 12, 2025-26 | ORL 108 @ BOS 113 | BOS +12.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 23, 2025-26 | ORL 129 @ BOS 138 | BOS -4.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 9, 2025-26 | BOS 111 @ ORL 107 | ORL -3.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 7, 2025-26 | BOS 110 @ ORL 123 | ORL -3.5 | ORL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Magic
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
−9.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−23.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
+15.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
−24.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+12.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−4.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
+23.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−26.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
−11.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
+3.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+8.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−16.5
over 3under 3avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Magic 0, Celtics 4, even 1
MagicBetterCeltics
G D. Bane17.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 62
→BOSSmall
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G J. Richardson5.3 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 3
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F F. Wagner19.7 pts · 6.7 reb · 7.8 ast
Score 90
=Even
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F T. da Silva14.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
→BOSSmall
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
C W. Carter13.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
→BOSSmall
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
MagicBetterCeltics
ORL offense21st of 30 · -1.5
→BOSBig
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
ORL defense15th of 30 · -0.1
=Even
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+14.7 · 3 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestORL betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Bane35 minJ. Richardson20 minJ. Carter18 minA. Morales6 min
Forwards
F. Wagner35 minT. da Silva29 minJ. Cain15 min
Centers
W. Carter32 minG. Bitadze9 minN. Vucevic9 minC. Castleton5 min
Out
J. SuggsOutP. BancheroOutA. BlackOut
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 107.7 #26 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.07 #21 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 101.9 #22 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.4 #15 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 35.4 #11 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 46.5 #6 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 31.7 #9 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #24 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 23.4 #26 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 26.3 #16 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.7 #22 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.13 #24 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 53.0 #13 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 34.6 #13 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 13.6 #26 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 68.9 #26 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 7.0 #26 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 4.2 #23 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Magic
2-4 overall · 2-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Celtics97–108
- W@ Raptors121–114
- L@ Raptors99–129
- W@ Knicks111–102
- Lvs Timberwolves93–115
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.