TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 5-1 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 111–111 · win probability BOS 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 222.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
SA 2, BOS 3 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
SA has played the 15th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
SA hits 34.9% and allows 37.3%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 39.0% and 45.9% of their shots
BOS offense vs SA defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SA 27.2%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: SA 75.8%, BOS 68.4%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SA 53.3 and allows 52.1; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, SA 2-0 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: SA 2-3 ATS, margin +11.0; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: SA plays 104.3 a game (11th fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SA 24.5, BOS 32.3. Allowed: SA 21.7, BOS 31.7
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SA 13.1%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: SA 15.7%, BOS 17.8%
Even
SA offense vs BOS defense
Offense 5th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SA 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: SA 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -0.6
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model222.0
Model edge—
Projected score
SA 110.7 · BOS 111.3
Win probability
BOS 52%
1st half
Spread
BOS -0.2
Total
111.4
Projected score
SA 55.6 · BOS 55.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
SA 4–6 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · SA has won the last 2 meetings · SA 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025-26 | BOS 116 @ SA 125 | SA -3.5 | SA W |
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | SA 100 @ BOS 95 | BOS +1.5 | SA W |
| Mar 29, 2024-25 | BOS 121 @ SA 111 | SA +12.5 | SA W |
| Feb 12, 2024-25 | SA 103 @ BOS 116 | BOS -7.5 | BOS W |
| Jan 17, 2023-24 | SA 98 @ BOS 117 | BOS -14.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Spurs
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −3.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−10.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−8.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
+1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+7.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−7.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
−2.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−9.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−0.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
−1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+0.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−4.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
+1.5
over 2under 4avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Spurs 1, Celtics 1, even 3
SpursBetterCeltics
G D. Harper18.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 4.8 ast
Score 98
=Even
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G D. Vassell12 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 53
→BOSSmall
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
G D. Fox16.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 7 ast
Score 84
=Even
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
G S. Castle14.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 69
=Even
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
F V. Wembanyama28 pts · 10.7 reb · 3 ast
Score 98
←SABig
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
SpursBetterCeltics
SA offense5th of 30 · +2.9
=Even
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
SA defense7th of 30 · +3.7
←SASmall
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt+42.2 · 4 players
←SABig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.3 · 1 player
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench+19.9 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSA betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Harper34 minD. Vassell33 minD. Fox32 minS. Castle29 minJ. McLaughlin6 minJ. Gillespie2 min
Forwards
V. Wembanyama33 minJ. Champagnie28 minK. Johnson22 minC. Bryant9 minH. Barnes8 minD. Jones Garcia6 min
Centers
L. Kornet15 minT. Reed4 min
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 117.3 #12 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.12 #10 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 104.3 #11 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #16 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 34.9 #17 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 39.0 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 24.5 #24 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #2 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 27.2 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 27.5 #9 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 110.2 #12 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.06 #6 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 52.1 #11 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 37.3 #23 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 15.7 #14 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 75.8 #7 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 9.2 #10 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 7.0 #1 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Spurs
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Timberwolves121–111
- W@ Jazz117–111
- Wvs Kings130–103
- W@ Mavericks122–106
- Lvs Rockets110–114
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.