Target Center · at Timberwolves · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 4-3 |
| 4-2 | ATS | 6-1 |
| 4-2 | O/U | 4-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIN 124–111 · win probability MIN 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 234.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIN has more of the edges
NO 1, MIN 6 · 2026-27 so far
MIN offense vs NO defense
Offense 3rd of 30 against a defense 24th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NO has played the 28th-hardest schedule, MIN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: NO 55.1 and allows 54.2; MIN 55.8 and allows 50.5
Three-pointers
NO hits 31.2% and allows 30.5%; MIN hits 37.6% and allows 31.2%. Threes are 32.8% and 42.8% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NO 24.3%, MIN 30.0%. Defensive: NO 76.4%, MIN 75.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: NO 35.3, MIN 26.1. Allowed: NO 30.6, MIN 28.9
NO offense vs MIN defense
Offense 13th of 30 against a defense 8th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MIN at home. This season: MIN 2-1 at home, NO 0-2 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NO 17.4%, MIN 15.1%. Forced: NO 16.3%, MIN 15.6%
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: NO plays 108.0 a game (2nd fastest), MIN 105.4 (9th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: NO 4-1 ATS, margin +2.8; MIN 4-1 ATS, margin +6.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NO 100%, MIN 100%. Transfers in: NO 0, MIN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMIN -12.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model234.4
Model edge—
Projected score
NO 110.9 · MIN 123.5
Win probability
MIN 82%
1st half
Spread
MIN -7.0
Total
117.2
Projected score
NO 55.1 · MIN 62.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% | |
| 4-3 57% | 6-1 86% | 4-3 57% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
NO 7–11 MINMIN leads · 18 games since 2021-22 · NO 10-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2025-26 | NO 126 @ MIN 132 | MIN -3.5 | MIN W |
| Feb 6, 2025-26 | NO 119 @ MIN 115 | MIN -8.5 | NO W |
| Dec 4, 2025-26 | MIN 125 @ NO 116 | NO +11.5 | NO W |
| Dec 2, 2025-26 | MIN 149 @ NO 142 | NO +12.5 | NO W |
| Mar 21, 2024-25 | NO 93 @ MIN 134 | MIN -14.5 | MIN W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Pelicans
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-2
67% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
−0.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+5.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−8.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+5.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
+27.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
+4.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+36.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−46.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+17.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
−19.5
over 4under 2avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Timberwolves
7 games played
Straight up
4-3
57% wins
Against the spread
6-1
86% covers · avg +12.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-3
57% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | @ | W 131-106 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 240.5 | U 237 |
| Oct 23 | @ | W 115-93 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 234.5 | U 208 |
| Oct 25 | vs | W 117-94 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 228.5 | U 211 |
| Oct 26 | @ | L 125-127 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 234.5 | O 252 |
| Oct 28 | vs | L 114-119 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 227.5 | O 233 |
| Oct 30 | vs | W 127-101 | -6.5 | W +19.5 | 222.5 | O 228 |
| Oct 31 | @ | L 111-121 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 230.5 | O 232 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MIA
W 131-106
+26.5
23
@
ORL
W 115-93
+23.5
25
vs
TOR
W 117-94
+19.5
26
@
CLE
L 125-127
+1.5
28
vs
GS
L 114-119
−8.5
30
vs
LAC
W 127-101
+19.5
31
@
SA
L 111-121
+2.5
covered 6didn’t cover 1avg +12.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MIA
W 131-106
−3.5
23
@
ORL
W 115-93
−26.5
25
vs
TOR
W 117-94
−17.5
26
@
CLE
L 125-127
+17.5
28
vs
GS
L 114-119
+5.5
30
vs
LAC
W 127-101
+5.5
31
@
SA
L 111-121
+1.5
over 4under 3avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Timberwolves has the better starters
Position by position: Pelicans 0, Timberwolves 4, even 1
PelicansBetterTimberwolves
G D. Murray17.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 6 ast
Score 45
=Even
G A. Dosunmu15.3 pts · 5 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 42
G J. Fears13 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 19
→MINBig
G L. Ball14.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 91
F Z. Williamson20.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 81
→MINSmall
F J. McDaniels17.3 pts · 6 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 96
F H. Jones6.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
→MINSmall
F J. Kuminga12.9 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
C D. Jordan6 pts · 6.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 52
→MINBig
C R. Gobert7 pts · 12.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 98
PelicansBetterTimberwolves
NO offense13th of 30 · +1.1
→MINSmall
MIN defense8th of 30 · +3.6
NO defense24th of 30 · -3.7
→MINBig
MIN offense3rd of 30 · +3.7
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
→MINBig
Backcourt+12.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+15.7 · 3 players
→MINBig
Frontcourt+46.4 · 3 players
Bench-16.0 · 5 players
→MINBig
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNO betterMIN betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Murray32 minJ. Fears25 minS. Bey25 minB. McGowens21 minB. Mathurin18 minA. Johnson10 min
Forwards
Z. Williamson32 minH. Jones21 minJ. Reese31 minT. Watford18 minK. Matkovic16 min
Centers
D. Jordan17 minD. Queen24 min
Out
J. PooleOutT. MurphyDay-To-DayY. MissiOut
Guards
A. Dosunmu29 minL. Ball25 minT. Shannon22 minB. Hyland12 minJ. Clark9 minZ. Pullin8 min
Forwards
J. McDaniels33 minJ. Kuminga30 minC. Williams24 minJ. Beringer19 minT. Lyles16 minI. Evans3 min
Centers
R. Gobert30 min
Out
A. EdwardsOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 119.7 #7 | Points per game | 120.0 #6 |
| 1.10 #15 | Points per possession | 1.13 #8 |
| 108.0 #2 | Pace (possessions) | 105.4 #9 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.1 #9 | Effective FG% | 55.8 #6 |
| 31.2 #25 | 3-point % | 37.6 #6 |
| 32.8 #30 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #16 |
| 35.3 #4 | Free throw rate | 26.1 #21 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #26 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #12 |
| 24.3 #25 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.0 #7 |
| 25.5 #21 | Assists per game | 27.3 #11 |
| Defense | ||
| 117.8 #24 | Points allowed | 108.7 #8 |
| 1.09 #16 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #4 |
| 54.2 #21 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #5 |
| 30.5 #5 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.2 #6 |
| 16.3 #10 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #17 |
| 76.4 #6 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.4 #8 |
| 13.7 #1 | Steals per game | 9.0 #13 |
| 4.8 #16 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #20 |
Pelicans
2-4 overall · 1-3 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Hawks121–99
- Wvs Kings132–120
- Lvs Nuggets91–104
- L@ Nuggets135–141
- L@ Jazz119–120
A week or more of rest.
Timberwolves
4-3 overall · 1-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Spurs111–121
- Wvs Clippers127–101
- Lvs Warriors114–119
- L@ Cavaliers125–127
- Wvs Raptors117–94
A week or more of rest.