Kia Center · at Magic · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLE 117–114 · win probability CLE 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 230.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLE has more of the edges
CLE 5, ORL 1 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
CLE has played the 24th-hardest schedule, ORL the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
CLE offense vs ORL defense
Offense 2nd of 30 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CLE 26.7%, ORL 23.4%. Defensive: CLE 73.9%, ORL 68.9%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CLE 14.2%, ORL 17.0%. Forced: CLE 14.1%, ORL 13.6%
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: CLE plays 106.2 a game (3rd fastest), ORL 101.9 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: CLE 28.9, ORL 31.7. Allowed: CLE 23.2, ORL 29.8
Shooting
Effective FG%: CLE 55.3 and allows 52.5; ORL 53.4 and allows 53.0
Home court
ORL at home. This season: ORL 0-3 at home, CLE 1-2 away
Even
Three-pointers
CLE hits 37.0% and allows 33.7%; ORL hits 35.4% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 43.6% and 46.5% of their shots
Even
ORL offense vs CLE defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CLE 2-3 ATS, margin +7.6; ORL 2-3 ATS, margin -9.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CLE 100%, ORL 100%. Transfers in: CLE 0, ORL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelCLE -3.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model230.7
Model edge—
Projected score
CLE 116.9 · ORL 113.8
Win probability
CLE 59%
1st half
Spread
CLE -1.9
Total
115.4
Projected score
CLE 58.7 · ORL 56.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 25 since 2021-22
CLE 17–8 ORLCLE leads · 25 games since 2021-22 · CLE 12-11-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2025-26 | ORL 131 @ CLE 136 | CLE -10.5 | ORL W |
| Mar 11, 2025-26 | CLE 122 @ ORL 128 | ORL +3.5 | ORL W |
| Jan 26, 2025-26 | ORL 98 @ CLE 114 | CLE -4.5 | CLE W |
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | CLE 119 @ ORL 105 | ORL -1.5 | CLE W |
| Mar 16, 2024-25 | ORL 108 @ CLE 103 | CLE -10.5 | ORL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cavaliers
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−5.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
−7.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
−1.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
+0.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−1.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−17.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
+17.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
+17.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
−8.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−12.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+12.5
over 3under 3avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Magic
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
−9.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−23.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
+15.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
−24.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+12.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−4.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
+23.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−26.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
−11.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
+3.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+8.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−16.5
over 3under 3avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cavaliers has the better starters
Position by position: Cavaliers 2, Magic 0, even 3
CavaliersBetterMagic
G J. Harden16.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 53
=Even
G D. Bane17.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 62
G D. Mitchell22.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 86
←CLEBig
G J. Richardson5.3 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 3
G S. Merrill8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
=Even
F F. Wagner19.7 pts · 6.7 reb · 7.8 ast
Score 90
C E. Mobley19.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 30
=Even
F T. da Silva14.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
C J. Allen15.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 100
←CLEBig
C W. Carter13.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
CavaliersBetterMagic
CLE offense2nd of 30 · +4.0
←CLEBig
ORL defense15th of 30 · -0.1
CLE defense20th of 30 · -1.2
=Even
ORL offense21st of 30 · -1.5
Backcourt+25.3 · 3 players
←CLEBig
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.9 · 2 players
←CLEBig
Frontcourt+14.7 · 3 players
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
←CLEBig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCLE betterORL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Harden34 minD. Mitchell33 minS. Merrill24 minM. Thomas21 minT. Proctor12 minC. Porter8 min
Forwards
M. Hezonja18 minT. Enaruna10 minR. Minix7 min
Centers
E. Mobley33 minJ. Allen28 minT. Bryant11 minE. UdehNew
Out
P. WatsonDay-To-DayJ. TysonOut
Guards
D. Bane35 minJ. Richardson20 minJ. Carter18 minA. Morales6 min
Forwards
F. Wagner35 minT. da Silva29 minJ. Cain15 min
Centers
W. Carter32 minG. Bitadze9 minN. Vucevic9 minC. Castleton5 min
Out
J. SuggsOutP. BancheroOutA. BlackOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.0 #2 | Points per game | 107.7 #26 |
| 1.14 #7 | Points per possession | 1.07 #21 |
| 106.2 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 101.9 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #7 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #15 |
| 37.0 #8 | 3-point % | 35.4 #11 |
| 43.6 #12 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #6 |
| 28.9 #13 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #9 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #6 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #24 |
| 26.7 #20 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.4 #26 |
| 28.7 #4 | Assists per game | 26.3 #16 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #20 | Points allowed | 116.7 #22 |
| 1.09 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #24 |
| 52.5 #12 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #13 |
| 33.7 #11 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #13 |
| 14.1 #25 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #26 |
| 73.9 #11 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #26 |
| 7.8 #22 | Steals per game | 7.0 #26 |
| 6.3 #6 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #23 |
Cavaliers
4-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Bucks136–111
- L@ Hawks111–114
- Wvs Wizards121–111
- Wvs Timberwolves127–125
- Wvs Nets125–121
A week or more of rest.
Magic
2-4 overall · 2-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Celtics97–108
- W@ Raptors121–114
- L@ Raptors99–129
- W@ Knicks111–102
- Lvs Timberwolves93–115
A week or more of rest.