Paycom Center · at Thunder
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKC | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 4-2 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 1-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKC 118–112 · win probability OKC 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 229.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OKC has more of the edges
MIA 1, OKC 3 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: MIA plays 106.2 a game (5th fastest), OKC 101.1 (27th). Faster games mean more points
OKC offense vs MIA defense
Offense 18th of 30 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MIA 24.5%, OKC 28.5%. Defensive: MIA 72.3%, OKC 71.4%
Context
Schedule so far
MIA has played the 11th-hardest schedule, OKC the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: MIA 27.3, OKC 21.8. Allowed: MIA 23.2, OKC 23.4
Home court
OKC at home. This season: OKC 3-0 at home, MIA 1-1 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MIA 54.6 and allows 56.8; OKC 49.5 and allows 51.0
Even
Three-pointers
MIA hits 34.1% and allows 40.6%; OKC hits 30.9% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 41.7% and 35.8% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MIA 14.1%, OKC 14.5%. Forced: MIA 15.4%, OKC 15.8%
Even
MIA offense vs OKC defense
Offense 1st of 30 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: MIA 2-3 ATS, margin +1.2; OKC 2-3 ATS, margin -3.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MIA 100%, OKC 100%. Transfers in: MIA 0, OKC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelOKC -5.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model229.9
Model edge—
Projected score
MIA 112.2 · OKC 117.7
Win probability
OKC 65%
1st half
Spread
OKC -3.0
Total
115.1
Projected score
MIA 56.1 · OKC 59
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 4-2 67% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MIA 5–5 OKCSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · MIA 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | OKC 120 @ MIA 122 | MIA +11.5 | MIA W |
| Jan 11, 2025-26 | MIA 112 @ OKC 124 | OKC -14.5 | MIA W |
| Feb 12, 2024-25 | MIA 101 @ OKC 115 | OKC -13.5 | OKC W |
| Dec 20, 2024-25 | OKC 104 @ MIA 97 | MIA +1.5 | OKC W |
| Mar 8, 2023-24 | MIA 100 @ OKC 107 | OKC -8.5 | MIA W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Heat
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−26.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
−14.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−9.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−11.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+14.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+11.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−3.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
+3.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−2.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−18.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+2.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+33.5
over 3under 3avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Thunder
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −12.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
+10.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
+4.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−9.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+2.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−28.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−18.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
−9.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
−56.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−14.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+17.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−11.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−2.5
over 1under 5avg −12.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Thunder has the better starters
Position by position: Heat 2, Thunder 3, even 0
HeatBetterThunder
G D. Mitchell16.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 8.2 ast
Score 48
→OKCBig
G S. Gilgeous-Alexander26 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 88
G K. Thompson10.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 20
→OKCBig
G A. Mitchell16.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
F G. Antetokounmpo28.2 pts · 12.3 reb · 5.5 ast
Score 89
←MIABig
G J. McCain10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 8
F A. Wiggins10.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 62
←MIASmall
G K. Williams5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
C B. Adebayo16.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
→OKCSmall
C I. Hartenstein9.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
HeatBetterThunder
MIA offense1st of 30 · +4.9
=Even
OKC defense2nd of 30 · +6.2
MIA defense26th of 30 · -5.2
→OKCSmall
OKC offense18th of 30 · -1.1
Backcourt+0.0 · 2 players
→OKCBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt+23.1 · 3 players
←MIABig
Frontcourt+12.0 · 1 player
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
←MIASmall
Bench-4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMIA betterOKC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Mitchell34 minK. Thompson21 minP. Larsson30 minD. Smith10 minR. Conwell4 min
Forwards
G. Antetokounmpo32 minA. Wiggins27 minB. Portis23 minS. Fontecchio17 minN. Jovic13 minM. Gardner9 min
Centers
B. Adebayo32 minN. Richards15 min
Out
T. HardawayDay-To-Day
Guards
S. Gilgeous-Alexander33 minA. Mitchell26 minJ. McCain25 minK. Williams14 minJ. Dix18 minB. Stirtz16 min
Forwards
J. Williams18 minB. Barnhizer9 min
Centers
I. Hartenstein24 minA. Mara18 min
Out
A. CarusoOutC. HolmgrenOutJ. WilliamsOutC. WallaceOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 118.3 #9 | Points per game | 106.5 #29 |
| 1.11 #14 | Points per possession | 1.05 #23 |
| 106.2 #5 | Pace (possessions) | 101.1 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.6 #12 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #28 |
| 34.1 #19 | 3-point % | 30.9 #26 |
| 41.7 #20 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #29 |
| 27.3 #19 | Free throw rate | 21.8 #28 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.1 #5 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #7 |
| 24.5 #24 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.5 #10 |
| 28.8 #3 | Assists per game | 21.7 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 121.5 #26 | Points allowed | 107.0 #5 |
| 1.15 #26 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #7 |
| 56.8 #27 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #6 |
| 40.6 #29 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #17 |
| 15.4 #18 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #13 |
| 72.3 #17 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #18 |
| 8.3 #19 | Steals per game | 8.3 #20 |
| 5.0 #13 | Blocks per game | 6.3 #7 |
Heat
2-4 overall · 2-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Pacers145–125
- W@ Hawks129–117
- Lvs Mavericks109–113
- L@ Hornets110–115
- Lvs Pistons111–128
A week or more of rest.
Thunder
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Rockets98–119
- L@ Mavericks96–120
- Wvs Suns125–114
- Wvs Clippers108–101
- Wvs Nuggets96–84
A week or more of rest.