Kaseya Center · at Heat
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 2-4 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 120–117 · win probability MIA 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 237.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 5, MIA 4 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; MIA hits 34.1% and allows 40.6%. Threes are 42.1% and 41.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, MIA the 11th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; MIA 54.6 and allows 56.8
MEM offense vs MIA defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, MIA 24.5%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, MIA 72.3%
MIA offense vs MEM defense
Offense 1st of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, MIA 27.3. Allowed: MEM 31.4, MIA 23.2
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; MIA 2-3 ATS, margin +1.2
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 1-3 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, MIA 14.1%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, MIA 15.4%
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), MIA 106.2 (5th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, MIA 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, MIA 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMIA -3.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model237.4
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 117.1 · MIA 120.2
Win probability
MIA 59%
1st half
Spread
MIA -1.6
Total
118.6
Projected score
MEM 58.5 · MIA 60.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 5–5 MIASeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · MIA has won the last 2 meetings · MEM 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025-26 | MEM 120 @ MIA 136 | MIA -11.5 | MIA W |
| Oct 24, 2025-26 | MIA 146 @ MEM 114 | MEM -3.5 | MIA W |
| Apr 3, 2024-25 | MEM 110 @ MIA 108 | MIA +5.5 | MIA W |
| Mar 15, 2024-25 | MIA 91 @ MEM 125 | MEM -5.5 | MEM W |
| Jan 24, 2023-24 | MEM 105 @ MIA 96 | MIA -11.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Heat
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−26.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
−14.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−9.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−11.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+14.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+11.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−3.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
+3.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−2.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−18.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+2.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+33.5
over 3under 3avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 4, Heat 1, even 0
GrizzliesBetterHeat
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMBig
G D. Mitchell16.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 8.2 ast
Score 48
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
←MEMBig
G K. Thompson10.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 20
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→MIABig
F G. Antetokounmpo28.2 pts · 12.3 reb · 5.5 ast
Score 89
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
←MEMSmall
F A. Wiggins10.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 62
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMSmall
C B. Adebayo16.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
GrizzliesBetterHeat
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
←MEMBig
MIA defense26th of 30 · -5.2
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
→MIABig
MIA offense1st of 30 · +4.9
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt+0.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+23.1 · 3 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→MIABig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterMIA betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
D. Mitchell34 minK. Thompson21 minP. Larsson30 minD. Smith10 minR. Conwell4 min
Forwards
G. Antetokounmpo32 minA. Wiggins27 minB. Portis23 minS. Fontecchio17 minN. Jovic13 minM. Gardner9 min
Centers
B. Adebayo32 minN. Richards15 min
Out
T. HardawayDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 118.3 #9 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.11 #14 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #5 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 54.6 #12 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 34.1 #19 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #20 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 27.3 #19 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 14.1 #5 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 24.5 #24 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 28.8 #3 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 121.5 #26 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #26 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.8 #27 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 40.6 #29 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #18 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #17 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 8.3 #19 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #13 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Heat
2-4 overall · 2-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Pacers145–125
- W@ Hawks129–117
- Lvs Mavericks109–113
- L@ Hornets110–115
- Lvs Pistons111–128
A week or more of rest.