Paycom Center · at Thunder
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKC | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-2 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 5-1 | O/U | 1-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKC 120–106 · win probability OKC 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 225.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OKC has more of the edges
MIL 2, OKC 6 · 2026-27 so far
MIL offense vs OKC defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MIL has played the 23rd-hardest schedule, OKC the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MIL 15.8%, OKC 14.5%. Forced: MIL 12.2%, OKC 15.8%
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: MIL plays 106.2 a game (4th fastest), OKC 101.1 (27th). Faster games mean more points
OKC offense vs MIL defense
Offense 18th of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4; OKC 49.5 and allows 51.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MIL 29.7%, OKC 28.5%. Defensive: MIL 74.2%, OKC 71.4%
Home court
OKC at home. This season: OKC 3-0 at home, MIL 0-2 away
Three-pointers
MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%; OKC hits 30.9% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 45.9% and 35.8% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: MIL 23.9, OKC 21.8. Allowed: MIL 29.7, OKC 23.4
Even
Recent form
Last 5: MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4; OKC 2-3 ATS, margin -3.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MIL 100%, OKC 100%. Transfers in: MIL 0, OKC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelOKC -13.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model225.7
Model edge—
Projected score
MIL 105.9 · OKC 119.8
Win probability
OKC 84%
1st half
Spread
OKC -7.7
Total
113.1
Projected score
MIL 52.7 · OKC 60.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% | |
| 4-2 67% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
MIL 7–4 OKCMIL leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · MIL 6-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2025-26 | MIL 110 @ OKC 93 | OKC -13.5 | MIL W |
| Jan 21, 2025-26 | OKC 122 @ MIL 102 | MIL +12.5 | OKC W |
| Mar 16, 2024-25 | OKC 121 @ MIL 105 | MIL +5.5 | OKC W |
| Feb 3, 2024-25 | MIL 96 @ OKC 125 | OKC -17.5 | OKC W |
| Dec 17, 2024-25 | MIL 97 @ OKC 81 | OKC -5.5 | MIL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Thunder
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −12.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
+10.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
+4.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−9.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+2.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−28.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−18.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
−9.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
−56.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−14.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+17.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−11.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−2.5
over 1under 5avg −12.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Thunder has the better starters
Position by position: Bucks 1, Thunder 3, even 1
BucksBetterThunder
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
→OKCBig
G S. Gilgeous-Alexander26 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 88
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
→OKCBig
G A. Mitchell16.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
←MILBig
G J. McCain10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 8
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
=Even
G K. Williams5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
→OKCSmall
C I. Hartenstein9.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
BucksBetterThunder
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
→OKCBig
OKC defense2nd of 30 · +6.2
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
→OKCSmall
OKC offense18th of 30 · -1.1
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
→OKCBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
→OKCBig
Frontcourt+12.0 · 1 player
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
←MILBig
Bench-4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMIL betterOKC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Guards
S. Gilgeous-Alexander33 minA. Mitchell26 minJ. McCain25 minK. Williams14 minJ. Dix18 minB. Stirtz16 min
Forwards
J. Williams18 minB. Barnhizer9 min
Centers
I. Hartenstein24 minA. Mara18 min
Out
A. CarusoOutC. HolmgrenOutJ. WilliamsOutC. WallaceOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.0 #17 | Points per game | 106.5 #29 |
| 1.07 #20 | Points per possession | 1.05 #23 |
| 106.2 #4 | Pace (possessions) | 101.1 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #21 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #28 |
| 33.9 #21 | 3-point % | 30.9 #26 |
| 45.9 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #29 |
| 23.9 #25 | Free throw rate | 21.8 #28 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #18 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #7 |
| 29.7 #8 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.5 #10 |
| 26.0 #20 | Assists per game | 21.7 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 126.2 #28 | Points allowed | 107.0 #5 |
| 1.18 #28 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #7 |
| 55.4 #24 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #6 |
| 34.9 #14 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #17 |
| 12.2 #30 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #13 |
| 74.2 #10 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #18 |
| 5.7 #30 | Steals per game | 8.3 #20 |
| 4.0 #27 | Blocks per game | 6.3 #7 |
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.
Thunder
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Rockets98–119
- L@ Mavericks96–120
- Wvs Suns125–114
- Wvs Clippers108–101
- Wvs Nuggets96–84
A week or more of rest.