No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
37–41
✓ M-OH won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
36–32
✓ GW won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–37
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
35–43
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
35–34
✗ IOWA lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–33
✓ ISU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
37–34
✓ UK won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
36–36
✗ TOL lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–35
✗ AAMU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
33–35
✓ GMU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
36–38
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
38–35
✓ LOU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
32–32
✓ HALL won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
34–43
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
35–41
✓ USU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
35–36
✗ TENN lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
34–42
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✗ URI lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
33–34
✓ GCU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
32–36
✗ NORF lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
31–38
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
38–39
✓ KENT won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
33–32
✗ MTSU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
30–41
✗ DUKE lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–36
✗ HOU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–40
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.7
Projected
36–40
✗ UGA lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
34–34
✓ TULN won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✗ DAV lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
36–39
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
33–35
✓ UTA won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–35
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
38–38
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
37–35
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
31–38
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
32–32
✓ UMES won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
33–34
✗ UNC lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✗ VILL lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✗ FAU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–35
✗ KU lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.9
Projected
38–40
✗ TA&M lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
34–34
✓ UTU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
38–36
✗ UCD lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
32–40
✓ UNM won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 15-15 · #209 28-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -3.8 | — | 78.3 | — | 66% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 16-14 · #101 14-14 · #100 |
— | — | GW -4.1 | — | 68.7 | — | 67% GW | › | |
| Half final | 20-12 · #48 27-4 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -1.3 | — | 72.7 | — | 56% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 15-17 · #52 25-6 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -8.0 | — | 78.3 | — | 81% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 21-11 · #43 20-11 · #33 |
— | — | IOWA -0.5 | — | 69.3 | — | 52% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 26-6 · #13 22-9 · #12 |
— | — | ISU -2.5 | — | 68.5 | — | 61% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 20-12 · #19 20-11 · #54 |
— | — | UK -2.9 | — | 71.7 | — | 62% UK | › | |
| Half final | 15-13 · #200 15-14 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -0.2 | — | 71.4 | — | 51% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #328 10-17 · #322 |
— | — | AAMU -0.1 | — | 69.6 | — | 50% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 15-16 · #142 22-8 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -2.5 | — | 67.6 | — | 61% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 16-16 · #56 22-9 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -2.3 | — | 73.9 | — | 60% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 23-9 · #14 24-7 · #25 |
— | — | LOU -3.0 | — | 73.5 | — | 63% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 15-16 · #37 20-11 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -0.5 | — | 64.3 | — | 52% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 21-10 · #39 29-2 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -8.9 | — | 76.3 | — | 83% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 16-15 · #98 24-6 · #58 |
— | — | USU -5.3 | — | 75.6 | — | 72% USU | › | |
| Half final | 17-15 · #21 21-10 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -1.4 | — | 71.0 | — | 56% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 15-14 · #237 24-5 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -7.4 | — | 75.9 | — | 79% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 16-15 · #105 15-14 · #107 |
— | — | URI -0.0 | — | 68.3 | — | 50% DUQ | › | |
| Half final | 21-11 · #96 20-11 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -0.9 | — | 66.8 | — | 54% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 7-21 · #353 11-16 · #319 |
— | — | NORF -4.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 67% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 15-18 · #59 23-8 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -6.8 | — | 68.5 | — | 77% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 13-16 · #128 21-8 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -1.2 | — | 76.9 | — | 55% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #154 15-13 · #244 |
— | — | MTSU -1.1 | — | 64.4 | — | 55% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 18-14 · #81 29-2 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -10.5 | — | 70.8 | — | 87% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 23-10 · #24 26-5 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -2.8 | — | 69.7 | — | 62% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 15-17 · #49 27-4 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -8.2 | — | 71.5 | — | 81% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 13-19 · #46 22-9 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -4.0 | — | 75.7 | — | 67% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 17-14 · #130 14-16 · #141 |
— | — | CLT -0.1 | — | 68.6 | — | 50% CLT | › | |
| Half final | 9-23 · #113 17-12 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -4.0 | — | 63.8 | — | 67% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 11-18 · #363 12-16 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -3.4 | — | 74.7 | — | 64% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 7-21 · #267 15-13 · #257 |
— | — | UTA -2.8 | — | 67.9 | — | 62% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 20-11 · #87 19-10 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -2.9 | — | 67.3 | — | 63% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 15-13 · #148 16-13 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -0.1 | — | 75.5 | — | 51% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 21-10 · #123 17-13 · #194 |
— | — | UCSD -2.3 | — | 72.3 | — | 60% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 14-18 · #62 21-10 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -6.2 | — | 68.7 | — | 75% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 7-22 · #364 8-17 · #357 |
— | — | UMES -0.3 | — | 63.5 | — | 51% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 23-9 · #35 24-7 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -1.0 | — | 66.4 | — | 54% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 15-17 · #64 24-7 · #32 |
— | — | VILL -3.7 | — | 68.0 | — | 66% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 16-14 · #109 16-13 · #112 |
— | — | FAU -0.6 | — | 65.9 | — | 53% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 22-10 · #40 22-9 · #16 |
— | — | KU -2.3 | — | 68.2 | — | 60% KU | › | |
| Half final | 18-14 · #31 21-10 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -1.6 | — | 77.9 | — | 57% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 11-18 · #253 15-14 · #268 |
— | — | UTU -0.0 | — | 67.9 | — | 50% UTU | › | |
| Half final | 17-13 · #182 15-15 · #312 |
— | — | UCD -1.4 | — | 73.9 | — | 56% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 8-23 · #143 21-9 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -7.6 | — | 71.6 | — | 80% UNM | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record