No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
39–36
✗ BAY lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✗ PV lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
33–34
✗ STAN lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
31–36
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
36–39
✓ SMU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
33–34
✗ ORE lost
Half finalConference · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
33–38
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
36–36
✓ FIU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
31–34
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
31–34
✗ SFA lost
Half finalConference · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–34
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✗ WRST lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
36–43
✓ BYU won
Half finalConference · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
30–36
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
37–36
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
33–36
✓ NU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
36–33
✗ GRAM lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.8
Projected
32–31
✓ SIE won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
33–35
✗ PRST lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
35–40
✗ GONZ lost
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ NMSU won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
40–39
✓ OKST won
Half finalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
36–35
✓ IDHO won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final |  15-15 · #29  16-15 · #60 |
— | — | BAY -2.7 | — | 74.6 | — | 61% BAY | › | |
| Half final |  9-22 · #360  10-17 · #343 |
— | — | PV -2.5 | — | 71.5 | — | 61% PV | › | |
| Half final |  12-19 · #74  20-11 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -0.8 | — | 66.2 | — | 54% STAN | › | |
| Half final |  10-21 · #73  17-14 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -5.1 | — | 67.0 | — | 71% CIN | › | |
| Half final |  15-16 · #63  19-12 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -2.8 | — | 75.0 | — | 62% SMU | › | |
| Half final |  11-20 · #50  12-19 · #57 |
— | — | ORE -1.6 | — | 66.7 | — | 57% ORE | › | |
| Half final |  12-17 · #307  20-8 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -4.9 | — | 70.4 | — | 70% UMBC | › | |
| Half final |  11-17 · #250  12-16 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -0.7 | — | 72.2 | — | 53% FIU | › | |
| Half final |  18-14 · #155  21-10 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -2.9 | — | 64.9 | — | 62% HOF | › | |
| Half final |  14-14 · #238  25-4 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -3.0 | — | 64.3 | — | 63% SFA | › | |
| Half final |  15-16 · #331  23-10 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -3.6 | — | 65.3 | — | 65% LIU | › | |
| Half final |  15-14 · #277  20-11 · #180 |
— | — | WRST -2.9 | — | 72.7 | — | 62% WRST | › | |
| Half final |  12-19 · #83  21-10 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -6.8 | — | 78.5 | — | 77% BYU | › | |
| Half final |  15-16 · #316  19-11 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -6.5 | — | 65.4 | — | 76% UVM | › | |
| Half final |  16-15 · #89  19-12 · #68 |
— | — | WAKE -0.4 | — | 72.6 | — | 52% WAKE | › | |
| Half final |  12-19 · #78  13-18 · #59 |
— | — | NU -3.3 | — | 69.5 | — | 64% NU | › | |
| Half final |  12-18 · #338  11-20 · #280 |
— | — | GRAM -2.8 | — | 68.4 | — | 62% GRAM | › | |
| Half final |  22-11 · #260  23-10 · #225 |
— | — | SIE -0.2 | — | 62.8 | — | 51% SIE | › | |
| Half final |  14-14 · #273  17-10 · #274 |
— | — | PRST -1.7 | — | 67.9 | — | 57% PRST | › | |
| Half final |  25-7 · #106  29-3 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -5.0 | — | 74.7 | — | 71% GONZ | › | |
| Half final |  12-15 · #133  12-16 · #198 |
— | — | NMSU -1.2 | — | 67.0 | — | 55% NMSU | › | |
| Half final |  17-13 · #287  24-5 · #127 |
— | — | MCN -4.8 | — | 67.7 | — | 70% MCN | › | |
| Half final |  18-13 · #45  17-14 · #65 |
— | — | OKST -0.7 | — | 78.8 | — | 53% OKST | › | |
| Half final |  16-14 · #247  13-18 · #254 |
— | — | IDHO -1.0 | — | 71.6 | — | 54% IDHO | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record