The HTC Center · at Coastal
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CCU 76–70 · win probability CCU 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CCU has more of the edges
UPST 0, CCU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
UPST hits 31.4% and allows 35.6%; CCU hits 33.5% and allows 32.8%. Threes are 35.6% and 43.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: UPST 48.3 and allows 51.0; CCU 47.9 and allows 46.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UPST 29.2%, CCU 26.9%. Defensive: UPST 68.6%, CCU 72.4%
UPST offense vs CCU defense
Offense 299th of 366 against a defense 246th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
CCU at home. This season: CCU 0-0 at home, UPST 0-0 away
Even
CCU offense vs UPST defense
Offense 295th of 366 against a defense 338th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UPST 9%, CCU 21%. Transfers in: UPST 3, CCU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
UPST has played the 281st-hardest schedule, CCU the 301st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UPST plays 70.5 a game (97th fastest), CCU 69.9 (121st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UPST 32.8, CCU 32.3. Allowed: UPST 36.0, CCU 34.9
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UPST 18.1%, CCU 15.3%. Forced: UPST 16.5%, CCU 12.3%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CCU -5.9 | — |
| Total | — | 146.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | UPST 70.1 · CCU 75.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CCU -3.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UPST 32.5 · CCU 35.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UPST 2–2 CCUSeries tied · 4 games since 2021-22 · UPST 2-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | CCU 78 @ UPST 85 | UPST -2.5 | UPST W |
| Nov 30, 2024-25 | UPST 51 @ CCU 73 | CCU -6.5 | CCU W |
| Nov 29, 2023-24 | UPST 70 @ CCU 72 | CCU -1.5 | CCU W |
| Nov 18, 2022-23 | CCU 78 @ UPST 79 | UPST +4.5 | UPST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SC Upstate
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-87 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 5 | @ | W 67-66 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-73 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 84-88 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 82-67 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +25.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 62-80 | +29.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 78-72 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-74 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-76 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-81 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-83 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 65-67 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-76 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-94 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-95 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-68 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-74 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-71 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-61 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 64-65 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+2.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
+10.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
+1.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
−6.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−5.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+7.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
+16.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+4.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
+8.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
+11.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
−4.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−8.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
−7.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−15.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
−3.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
−15.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−11.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
+6.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
−2.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+7.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
−10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
−0.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
+9.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+3.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−4.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−1.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−11.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+9.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
−31.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
−22.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
+21.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−17.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+0.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
−22.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+18.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
−4.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
−9.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
+2.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−13.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
+25.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−36.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
+6.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−21.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
−22.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
+3.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+43.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
+10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
+9.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
−26.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+8.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−22.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−14.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−14.5
over 14under 15avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Coastal
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-76 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 72-66 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-64 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-58 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 42-94 | +12.5 | L −39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-60 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-85 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +16.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-82 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 49-67 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 68-62 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 81-82 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-89 | -6.5 | L −24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-62 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 85-83 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 79-75 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 72-70 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-67 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 48-53 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 101 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 83-79 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 94-91 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-67 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 76-71 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 69-68 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-96 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
−2.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
+8.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+0.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+16.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
+13.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−39.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−0.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
−4.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+20.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−3.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−13.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+5.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
+13.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
−2.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
−24.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−8.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
+6.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+11.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
+10.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+0.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+15.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−1.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
−6.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
+0.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+5.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+2.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−0.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+6.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+3.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
+7.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
−25.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
+0.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
−27.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+9.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
−14.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−10.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−13.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
+18.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+18.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−0.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−21.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+2.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
−14.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
+5.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
+11.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−15.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
−4.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+16.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
−3.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+1.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+10.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−38.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
+15.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
−15.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+37.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+1.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−8.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+0.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+5.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
−4.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
+16.5
over 17under 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: SC Upstate 1, Coastal 1, even 3
SC UpstateBetterCoastal
G C. Rich0 pts · 0 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Thompson3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 15
F M. Webb TR9.9 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 56
←UPSTSmall
G D. Washington TR4.5 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 25
F D. Tubek TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Perry TR4.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
F Z. Johnson TR0 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Craig4.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 31
C C. Collier1.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 10
→CCUSmall
F A. Hardaway TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
SC UpstateBetterCoastal
UPST offense299th of 366 · -9.2
=Even
CCU defense246th of 366 · -6.5
UPST defense338th of 366 · -8.9
=Even
CCU offense295th of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-0.1 · 1 player
←UPSTBig
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 4 players
→CCUSmall
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUPST betterCCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Rich5 minA. Allen-JohnsonNewW. TessemaNewR. NaugleNewJ. PattersonNewN. MvulaNew
Forwards
M. Webb27 min · TRD. Tubek7 min · TRZ. Johnson2 min · TRK. PayneNewD. EdmondNewA. PerottiNew
Centers
C. Collier14 min
Guards
T. Thompson20 minD. Washington15 min · TRT. Perry13 min · TRD. Craig12 minJ. Cross6 min · TRJ. AlstonNew
Forwards
A. Hardaway20 min · TRD. Green11 minD. Fuquay8 min · TRF. BighamNewJ. BuzzardNew
Centers
C. Middleton10 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.0 #265 | Points per game | 71.8 #251 |
| 1.00 #324 | Points per possession | 1.03 #290 |
| 70.5 #97 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #121 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.3 #307 | Effective FG% | 47.9 #314 |
| 31.4 #308 | 3-point % | 33.5 #196 |
| 35.6 #256 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #113 |
| 32.8 #239 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #254 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #274 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #84 |
| 29.2 #231 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #296 |
| 11.7 #304 | Assists per game | 9.9 #359 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.7 #210 | Points allowed | 73.5 #143 |
| 1.08 #170 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #88 |
| 51.0 #156 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.8 #18 |
| 35.6 #289 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.8 #105 |
| 16.5 #185 | Turnovers forced | 12.3 #364 |
| 68.6 #224 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.4 #52 |
| 6.1 #220 | Steals per game | 4.3 #360 |
| 4.7 #24 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #187 |
SC Upstate
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gardner-Webb64–65
- Wvs Gardner-Webb71–61
- L@ Radford59–71
- Wvs Presbyterian76–74
- L@ Winthrop64–68
A week or more of rest.
Coastal
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern72–96
- W@ James Madison69–68
- W@ Georgia St76–71
- Wvs Marshall79–75
- Lvs James Madison65–67
A week or more of rest.