Desert Financial Arena · at Arizona St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ASU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ASU 81–65 · win probability ASU 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ASU has more of the edges
HOF 3, ASU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
HOF offense vs ASU defense
Offense 254th of 366 against a defense 60th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
HOF hits 37.1% and allows 32.3%; ASU hits 33.4% and allows 35.0%. Threes are 42.9% and 38.4% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOF 34.7%, ASU 29.9%. Defensive: HOF 69.0%, ASU 65.1%
Context
Schedule so far
HOF has played the 142nd-hardest schedule, ASU the 13th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOF 51.4 and allows 46.3; ASU 51.1 and allows 52.4
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: HOF plays 65.9 a game (319th fastest), ASU 70.6 (93rd). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOF 31.6, ASU 39.5. Allowed: HOF 35.1, ASU 34.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOF 16.1%, ASU 17.1%. Forced: HOF 15.0%, ASU 18.4%
ASU offense vs HOF defense
Offense 55th of 366 against a defense 120th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
ASU at home. This season: ASU 0-0 at home, HOF 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOF 12%, ASU 11%. Transfers in: HOF 4, ASU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ASU -16.7 | — |
| Total | — | 145.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | HOF 64.5 · ASU 81.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ASU -9.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOF 29.2 · ASU 39 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hofstra
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
21-12
64% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-82 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 83-77 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 76-81 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 63-58 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 78-58 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-60 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 70-72 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 80-73 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 70-69 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-66 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-64 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-76 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 85-89 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 82-89 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 73-57 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 80-63 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-49 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 66-62 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-70 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-43 | -11.5 | W +24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 82-68 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 67-58 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 62-51 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 92-61 | -2.5 | W +28.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 68-65 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 70-90 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UCF
L 78-82
+4.5
7
@
IONA
L 73-81
−9.5
14
@
BUCK
W 83-77
+1.5
19
@
TEM
L 76-81
+0.5
28
vs
LAS
W 63-58
+1.5
29
vs
MRMK
W 78-58
+14.5
30
@
PENN
W 77-60
+15.5
3
@
COLU
L 70-72
+1.5
7
@
PITT
W 80-73
+15.5
13
@
SYR
W 70-69
+10.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 74-66
+0.5
29
vs
CAM
W 86-72
+7.5
3
@
DREX
W 70-67
−1.5
8
@
TOW
W 78-67
+12.5
10
vs
MONM
W 67-64
−4.5
15
@
STBK
L 71-76
−11.5
17
vs
ELON
L 85-89
−9.5
22
@
NCAT
L 78-79
−10.5
24
@
W&M
L 82-89
−3.5
29
vs
COFC
L 64-66
−4.5
31
@
MONM
W 73-57
+14.5
5
vs
NE
W 80-63
+8.5
7
vs
TOW
W 71-49
+17.5
12
@
COFC
W 66-62
+5.5
14
@
UNCW
L 66-70
−1.5
19
vs
HAMP
W 79-43
+24.5
21
@
NE
W 82-68
+7.5
28
vs
STBK
W 67-58
−2.5
3
vs
DREX
W 62-51
+2.5
8
vs
W&M
W 92-61
+28.5
9
vs
TOW
W 68-65
−1.5
10
vs
MONM
W 75-69
+1.5
20
vs
ALA
L 70-90
−8.5
covered 21didn’t cover 12avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UCF
L 78-82
+19.5
7
@
IONA
L 73-81
+9.5
14
@
BUCK
W 83-77
+20.5
19
@
TEM
L 76-81
+11.5
28
vs
LAS
W 63-58
−17.5
29
vs
MRMK
W 78-58
+0.5
30
@
PENN
W 77-60
−12.5
3
@
COLU
L 70-72
−2.5
7
@
PITT
W 80-73
+18.5
13
@
SYR
W 70-69
−0.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 74-66
−7.5
29
vs
CAM
W 86-72
+8.5
3
@
DREX
W 70-67
+5.5
8
@
TOW
W 78-67
+10.5
10
vs
MONM
W 67-64
−8.5
15
@
STBK
L 71-76
+10.5
17
vs
ELON
L 85-89
+24.5
22
@
NCAT
L 78-79
+10.5
24
@
W&M
L 82-89
+13.5
29
vs
COFC
L 64-66
−18.5
31
@
MONM
W 73-57
−10.5
5
vs
NE
W 80-63
−10.5
7
vs
TOW
W 71-49
−17.5
12
@
COFC
W 66-62
−18.5
14
@
UNCW
L 66-70
−1.5
19
vs
HAMP
W 79-43
−11.5
21
@
NE
W 82-68
+5.5
28
vs
STBK
W 67-58
−15.5
3
vs
DREX
W 62-51
−20.5
8
vs
W&M
W 92-61
+0.5
9
vs
TOW
W 68-65
+0.5
10
vs
MONM
W 75-69
+10.5
20
vs
ALA
L 70-90
+1.5
over 18under 15avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arizona St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 81-64 | -17.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 81-66 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 65-77 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 75-62 | -18.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-86 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 100-94 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 75-88 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-70 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-48 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-78 | -12.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 89-95 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-104 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 82-89 | +21.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 73-103 | +18.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 63-75 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-68 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 74-87 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-63 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-78 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 85-76 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 72-67 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-73 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 78-90 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-60 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 42-91 | +13.5 | L −35.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−0.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
+2.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
+1.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−5.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+8.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+7.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+1.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
−8.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
+21.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
+8.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+4.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
−3.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
−15.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
−7.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
−10.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+14.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
−11.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−13.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+17.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
+3.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
+1.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
+9.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−4.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
+5.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
+12.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
+3.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
−5.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
+6.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
+15.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
−4.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−35.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−6.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
−5.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
−16.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−8.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+15.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+19.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+36.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
+1.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
−1.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
−33.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+6.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
+24.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
+5.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
+27.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
+11.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+3.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
+33.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−7.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+3.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
−6.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
−2.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
−27.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−10.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
−2.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
−17.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
−16.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
+18.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
−17.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
−21.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
+2.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−15.5
over 16under 17avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arizona St has the better starters
Position by position: Hofstra 0, Arizona St 4, even 1
HofstraBetterArizona St
G J. Moore TR10.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 46
→ASUSmall
G J. Foxwell TR15.8 pts · 4.3 reb · 6.4 ast
Score 79
G D. Tavarez TR8.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 47
=Even
G D. Shaw TR7.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 55
F J. DeCady6.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 17
→ASUBig
G E. Innocenti TR6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
F S. Wewe TR2.4 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 17
→ASUBig
F P. Murauskas TR18.4 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 97
F I. Zorgvol TR5.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 62
→ASUSmall
C B. Defty TR15.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
HofstraBetterArizona St
HOF offense254th of 366 · -7.7
→ASUBig
ASU defense60th of 366 · +1.2
HOF defense120th of 366 · -1.9
→ASUSmall
ASU offense55th of 366 · +3.2
Backcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→ASUSmall
Backcourt+1.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 3 players
→ASUBig
Frontcourt+9.4 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestHOF betterASU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Moore30 min · TRD. Tavarez23 min · TRT. ThomasNewC. LopezNewT. BoydNewN. JeffersonNew
Forwards
J. DeCady25 minS. Wewe16 min · TRI. Zorgvol15 min · TRR. DunnNew
Guards
J. Foxwell36 min · TRD. Shaw28 min · TRE. Innocenti24 min · TRB. Ford22 minV. WallaceNewJ. CroyNew
Forwards
P. Murauskas33 min · TRA. NyuonNewM. VaughnsNew
Centers
B. Defty29 min · TRN. Garcia7 min · TRF. MalesevicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #184 | Points per game | 76.3 #133 |
| 1.13 #86 | Points per possession | 1.08 #178 |
| 65.9 #319 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #93 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #178 | Effective FG% | 51.1 #190 |
| 37.1 #26 | 3-point % | 33.4 #202 |
| 42.9 #119 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.4 #201 |
| 31.6 #264 | Free throw rate | 39.5 #66 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #148 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #211 |
| 34.7 #54 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.9 #206 |
| 12.3 #263 | Assists per game | 13.7 #166 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.2 #36 | Points allowed | 78.3 #273 |
| 1.04 #69 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #239 |
| 46.3 #14 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #235 |
| 32.3 #78 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.0 #249 |
| 15.0 #292 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #77 |
| 69.0 #201 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.1 #337 |
| 4.8 #343 | Steals per game | 7.0 #122 |
| 3.5 #135 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #32 |
Hofstra
22-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alabama70–90
- Wvs Monmouth75–69
- Wvs Towson68–65
- Wvs William & Mary92–61
- Wvs Drexel62–51
A week or more of rest.
Arizona St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State42–91
- Wvs Baylor83–79
- L@ Iowa State65–86
- Wvs Kansas70–60
- Wvs Utah73–60
A week or more of rest.