Hynes Athletics Center · at Iona · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IONA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects IONA 75–72 · win probability IONA 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: IONA has more of the edges
QUIN 2, IONA 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
QUIN hits 34.0% and allows 34.9%; IONA hits 35.1% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 33.7% and 45.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: QUIN 34.1%, IONA 27.8%. Defensive: QUIN 68.0%, IONA 68.8%
Shooting
Effective FG%: QUIN 48.1 and allows 48.9; IONA 51.9 and allows 48.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: QUIN 15.8%, IONA 17.2%. Forced: QUIN 17.4%, IONA 16.6%
Home court
IONA at home. This season: IONA 0-0 at home, QUIN 0-0 away
Even
QUIN offense vs IONA defense
Offense 243rd of 366 against a defense 204th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: QUIN 33.8, IONA 29.3. Allowed: QUIN 30.6, IONA 28.8
Even
IONA offense vs QUIN defense
Offense 262nd of 366 against a defense 232nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: QUIN plays 70.3 a game (100th fastest), IONA 69.8 (129th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
QUIN has played the 324th-hardest schedule, IONA the 326th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: QUIN 31%, IONA 31%. Transfers in: QUIN 2, IONA 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelIONA -3.6
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model146.7
Model edge—
Projected score
QUIN 71.5 · IONA 75.2
Win probability
IONA 63%
1st half
Spread
IONA -2.0
Total
68.6
Projected score
QUIN 33.3 · IONA 35.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
QUIN 6–4 IONAQUIN leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · QUIN 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025-26 | QUIN 89 @ IONA 68 | IONA -2.5 | QUIN W |
| Mar 14, 2024-25 | IONA 81 vs QUIN 73 | QUIN -4.5 | IONA W |
| Feb 16, 2024-25 | IONA 74 @ QUIN 79 | QUIN -6.5 | IONA W |
| Jan 12, 2024-25 | QUIN 63 @ IONA 62 | IONA +1.5 | IONA W |
| Mar 1, 2023-24 | QUIN 82 @ IONA 64 | IONA -3.5 | QUIN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Quinnipiac
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-108 | +26.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 71-49 | -9.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 60-97 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 70-64 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 83-75 | +12.5 | W +20.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 91-102 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 76-62 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 5 | @ | W 89-68 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 72-58 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-71 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 85-75 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 66-74 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 64-58 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 79-80 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 80-69 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 70-60 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 70-74 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-83 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 98-92 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-71 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 91-98 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 75-60 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 56-55 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 74-62 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 49-56 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 79-85 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 76-78 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-77 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SJU
L 74-108
−7.5
6
vs
CCSU
W 71-49
+12.5
11
vs
YALE
L 60-97
−30.5
16
@
ME
W 70-64
+2.5
23
@
PITT
W 83-75
+20.5
25
@
UCF
L 91-102
+2.5
30
vs
STO
W 76-62
−1.5
5
@
IONA
W 89-68
+23.5
7
vs
RID
W 72-58
−0.5
13
vs
UML
W 75-71
−8.5
17
@
MONM
W 85-75
+11.5
21
@
HOF
L 66-74
−0.5
29
vs
MRST
W 64-58
+3.5
2
@
MAN
L 79-80
−8.5
4
vs
MSM
W 80-69
+3.5
11
@
SHU
W 70-60
+4.5
14
vs
SPU
L 70-74
−10.5
17
@
MRMK
L 71-83
−13.5
19
vs
MAN
W 98-92
−7.5
22
@
MSM
W 77-62
+10.5
24
@
MRST
L 64-71
−3.5
30
vs
SHU
L 91-98
−15.5
1
@
FAIR
W 72-65
+4.5
5
vs
CAN
W 75-60
−0.5
7
vs
NIA
W 56-55
−11.5
13
@
SIE
W 74-62
+15.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 49-56
−10.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 79-85
−12.5
27
@
NIA
L 76-78
−10.5
1
@
CAN
W 67-63
−3.5
7
vs
MRST
L 75-77
−3.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SJU
L 74-108
+25.5
6
vs
CCSU
W 71-49
−30.5
11
vs
YALE
L 60-97
+0.5
16
@
ME
W 70-64
−3.5
23
@
PITT
W 83-75
+17.5
25
@
UCF
L 91-102
+30.5
30
vs
STO
W 76-62
−10.5
5
@
IONA
W 89-68
−6.5
7
vs
RID
W 72-58
−17.5
13
vs
UML
W 75-71
−7.5
17
@
MONM
W 85-75
+14.5
21
@
HOF
L 66-74
−7.5
29
vs
MRST
W 64-58
−23.5
2
@
MAN
L 79-80
−0.5
4
vs
MSM
W 80-69
−1.5
11
@
SHU
W 70-60
−22.5
14
vs
SPU
L 70-74
+3.5
17
@
MRMK
L 71-83
+12.5
19
vs
MAN
W 98-92
+36.5
22
@
MSM
W 77-62
−9.5
24
@
MRST
L 64-71
−4.5
30
vs
SHU
L 91-98
+32.5
1
@
FAIR
W 72-65
−17.5
5
vs
CAN
W 75-60
−6.5
7
vs
NIA
W 56-55
−26.5
13
@
SIE
W 74-62
−8.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 49-56
−36.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 79-85
+13.5
27
@
NIA
L 76-78
+17.5
1
@
CAN
W 67-63
−8.5
7
vs
MRST
L 75-77
+16.5
over 12under 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iona
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg 0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-73 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 105-91 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 196 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 76-71 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 89-69 | -2.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +11.5 | L −9.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 91-84 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 75-80 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 1 | @ | W 89-66 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 68-89 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-69 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 69-63 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-91 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 83-78 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 59-66 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 75-72 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 38-83 | +4.5 | L −40.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 71-53 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 74-48 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-77 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 61-60 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-57 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 70-71 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-79 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-83 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 69-63 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 68-70 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 132.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 72-64 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 86-88 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-58 | -11.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 69-65 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 80-91 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
HOF
W 81-73
+9.5
11
@
KC
W 105-91
+9.5
14
vs
FOR
W 76-71
−0.5
18
vs
PRIN
W 89-69
+17.5
21
vs
AKR
L 75-96
−9.5
22
vs
ORST
W 91-84
+10.5
24
vs
GB
L 75-80
−10.5
1
@
DEL
W 89-66
+21.5
5
vs
QUIN
L 68-89
−23.5
7
@
SHU
W 81-69
+13.5
10
vs
BRY
W 69-63
−2.5
13
@
SJU
L 64-91
+1.5
20
@
UVM
W 83-78
+11.5
29
@
MSM
L 59-66
−9.5
2
vs
SIE
W 75-72
+4.5
4
@
MRST
L 38-83
−40.5
9
vs
NIA
W 71-53
+7.5
11
vs
CAN
W 74-48
+14.5
14
@
RID
L 68-72
−11.5
19
@
SPU
L 63-77
−10.5
22
vs
MRMK
W 61-60
+2.5
24
vs
MAN
W 66-57
+1.5
30
vs
FAIR
L 70-71
−2.5
5
@
SIE
L 72-79
+1.5
7
vs
MSM
L 76-83
−10.5
13
@
CAN
W 69-63
+1.5
15
@
NIA
L 68-70
−5.5
20
vs
SPU
W 72-64
+6.5
22
@
MRMK
L 86-88
+4.5
27
vs
RID
W 80-58
+10.5
1
@
MAN
W 69-65
+1.5
5
vs
SHU
L 80-91
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
HOF
W 81-73
+9.5
11
@
KC
W 105-91
+39.5
14
vs
FOR
W 76-71
−10.5
18
vs
PRIN
W 89-69
+3.5
21
vs
AKR
L 75-96
−2.5
22
vs
ORST
W 91-84
+17.5
24
vs
GB
L 75-80
+4.5
1
@
DEL
W 89-66
+5.5
5
vs
QUIN
L 68-89
−6.5
7
@
SHU
W 81-69
−13.5
10
vs
BRY
W 69-63
−14.5
13
@
SJU
L 64-91
−4.5
20
@
UVM
W 83-78
+8.5
29
@
MSM
L 59-66
−28.5
2
vs
SIE
W 75-72
−2.5
4
@
MRST
L 38-83
−27.5
9
vs
NIA
W 71-53
−16.5
11
vs
CAN
W 74-48
−19.5
14
@
RID
L 68-72
−1.5
19
@
SPU
L 63-77
−1.5
22
vs
MRMK
W 61-60
−22.5
24
vs
MAN
W 66-57
−30.5
30
vs
FAIR
L 70-71
−5.5
5
@
SIE
L 72-79
+10.5
7
vs
MSM
L 76-83
+17.5
13
@
CAN
W 69-63
−5.5
15
@
NIA
L 68-70
+5.5
20
vs
SPU
W 72-64
−4.5
22
@
MRMK
L 86-88
+37.5
27
vs
RID
W 80-58
−3.5
1
@
MAN
W 69-65
−17.5
5
vs
SHU
L 80-91
+21.5
over 12under 20avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Quinnipiac has the better starters
Position by position: Quinnipiac 3, Iona 2, even 0
QuinnipiacBetterIona
G N. Guerengomba2.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 4
→IONABig
G K. Vanderhorst TR9.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 44
G T. Turnage3.4 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 36
←QUINSmall
G M. Kheil TR9.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 17
F K. McKnight10.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 79
←QUINSmall
G K. Akametu11 pts · 5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 53
F H. Pierre-Louis TR3.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 1
→IONABig
F A. Disu TR11 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 50
F N. Hart TR2.2 pts · 3.1 reb · 0 ast
Score 27
←QUINSmall
F A. Fall2.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
QuinnipiacBetterIona
QUIN offense243rd of 366 · -7.3
=Even
IONA defense204th of 366 · -5.0
QUIN defense232nd of 366 · -6.2
=Even
IONA offense262nd of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-2.7 · 2 players
←QUINSmall
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players
←QUINSmall
Frontcourt-3.0 · 2 players
Bench-0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestQUIN betterIONA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Guerengomba14 minT. Turnage12 minM. ParrottaNewT. Cunningham-PembertonNewL. SekasiNewM. FieldsNew
Forwards
K. McKnight25 minH. Pierre-Louis15 min · TRN. Hart11 min · TRB. Ritvo7 minA. Akinniyi2 minC. Skenderi2 min
Guards
K. Vanderhorst30 min · TRM. Kheil30 min · TRK. Akametu24 minO. Hourruitiner2 minP. LefasNewD. DoyleNew
Forwards
A. Disu28 min · TRA. Fall19 minL. Jungers16 minK. Mitchell11 min · TRS. Ibine Ayo8 min · TRO. OdutayoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.2 #190 | Points per game | 73.8 #206 |
| 1.05 #246 | Points per possession | 1.06 #228 |
| 70.3 #100 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #129 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.1 #310 | Effective FG% | 51.9 #149 |
| 34.0 #171 | 3-point % | 35.1 #105 |
| 33.7 #304 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #49 |
| 33.8 #217 | Free throw rate | 29.3 #326 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #125 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #220 |
| 34.1 #65 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.8 #274 |
| 13.0 #211 | Assists per game | 14.0 #147 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.6 #121 | Points allowed | 73.1 #136 |
| 1.04 #68 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #85 |
| 48.9 #65 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #64 |
| 34.9 #242 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #25 |
| 17.4 #122 | Turnovers forced | 16.6 #180 |
| 68.0 #253 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.8 #212 |
| 7.8 #55 | Steals per game | 6.6 #159 |
| 4.5 #37 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #227 |
Quinnipiac
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Marist75–77
- W@ Canisius67–63
- L@ Niagara76–78
- Lvs Fairfield79–85
- Lvs Merrimack49–56
A week or more of rest.
Iona
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Sacred Heart80–91
- W@ Manhattan69–65
- Wvs Rider80–58
- L@ Merrimack86–88
- Wvs Saint Peter's72–64
A week or more of rest.