Kennedy Family Athletic Complex · at UMass Lowell
#349STOStonehill
@
#307UMLUMass Lowell
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Stonehill and UMass Lowell
STOThis seasonUML
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects UML 72–68 · win probability UML 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: UML has more of the edges

STO 2, UML 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UMLSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: STO 27.3, UML 34.9. Allowed: STO 30.3, UML 28.3
STOSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: STO 46.9 and allows 47.8; UML 49.8 and allows 53.5
STOSmall
UML offense vs STO defense
Offense 286th of 366 against a defense 225th, on the model’s ratings
UMLSmall
Home court
UML at home. This season: UML 0-0 at home, STO 0-0 away
UMLSmall
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: STO 27.5%, UML 32.7%. Defensive: STO 72.9%, UML 70.7%
UMLSmall
STO offense vs UML defense
Offense 363rd of 366 against a defense 318th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: STO 19.4%, UML 18.0%. Forced: STO 13.4%, UML 14.2%
Context
Schedule so far
STO has played the 352nd-hardest schedule, UML the 312th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: STO plays 67.6 a game (244th fastest), UML 68.9 (189th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
STO hits 31.7% and allows 33.4%; UML hits 32.2% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 40.5% and 31.3% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: STO 28%, UML 16%. Transfers in: STO 6, UML 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—UML -4.7—
Total—139.8—
Projected score—STO 67.6 · UML 72.2

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadUML -2.7—
1H total65.5—
1H projected scoreSTO 31.4 · UML 34.1—

UMass Lowell has the better starters

Position by position: Stonehill 0, UMass Lowell 2, even 3
StonehillBetterUMass Lowell
G W. Batchelder8 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.5 ast Not ranked
No call
G C. Jones TR4.3 pts · 0.8 reb · 1.2 ast Score 6
G A. Boldin TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast Score 29
UMLSmall
G J. Newton TR7.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.6 ast Score 55
G D. Arlington TR2.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast Score 5
No call
G I. Walter1.6 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.4 ast Not ranked
G E. Greenberg TR2.3 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 0
Even
F V. Okojie4.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.7 ast Score 11
G A. Allen TR3.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast Score 15
UMLBig
F J. Harris TR5.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast Score 59
StonehillBetterUMass Lowell
STO offense363rd of 366 · -14.8
Even
UML defense318th of 366 · -8.2
STO defense225th of 366 · -5.9
STOSmall
UML offense286th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-10.2 · 5 players
UMLBig
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
No call
Frontcourt-1.7 · 2 players
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
UMLSmall
Bench-0.7 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestSTO betterUML betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Stonehill
Guards
W. Batchelder32 minA. Boldin18 min · TRD. Arlington14 min · TRE. Greenberg14 min · TRA. Allen14 min · TRT. Ruth11 min
Forwards
P. McGuinn9 minE. Steele4 min · TRJ. MedalieNewB. LeonsNew
Centers
D. ChengNew
UMass Lowell
Guards
C. Jones18 min · TRJ. Newton17 min · TRI. Walter8 minK. GilesNewJ. CannadyNewM. EllisNew
Forwards
V. Okojie18 minJ. Harris11 min · TRJ. Roberson7 minD. HandNewE. DialloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
STOUML
Scoring
64.2 #353Points per game71.7 #253
0.95 #357Points per possession1.04 #272
67.6 #244Pace (possessions)68.9 #189
Shooting
46.9 #339Effective FG%49.8 #247
31.7 #2943-point %32.2 #269
40.5 #1583-point attempt rate31.3 #336
27.3 #350Free throw rate34.9 #183
Possessions
19.4 #333Turnover rate18.0 #269
27.5 #282Offensive rebound rate32.7 #98
11.8 #298Assists per game11.9 #294
Defense
69.5 #56Points allowed77.4 #249
1.03 #57Points allowed per possession1.13 #277
47.8 #36Opponent effective FG%53.5 #284
33.4 #150Opponent 3-point %34.6 #226
13.4 #347Turnovers forced14.2 #329
72.9 #40Defensive rebound rate70.7 #126
4.7 #347Steals per game5.1 #326
4.0 #75Blocks per game3.0 #222

Stonehill

10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ Mercyhurst51–56
  • W@ Le Moyne81–71
  • Lvs Mercyhurst72–75
  • Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves103–77
  • Wvs Le Moyne77–68

A week or more of rest.

UMass Lowell

12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-8 in conference · America East Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ UMBC69–91
  • Wvs UAlbany81–76
  • W@ Maine67–56
  • Lvs UMBC60–84
  • L@ Vermont64–66

A week or more of rest.