Conte Forum · at Boston College · Conference game
Closing line
WAKE -3.5✓ BC covered by 4.5
WAKE -3.5✓ BC covered by 4.5Closing total145.5Under by 10.5
| WAKE | This season | BC |
|---|---|---|
| 14-13 | Record | 9-18 |
| 11-16 | ATS | 12-15 |
| 16-11 | O/U | 11-16 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: WAKE 76–71 BC · ✗ WAKE (68%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 29 | 38 | 67 |
| BC | 22 | 46 | 68 |
1st half: WAKE 29, BC 22 (WAKE by 7). The model had WAKE by 3.2 and a total of 68.7 (actual 51).
Team stats
| WAKE | BC | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-62 35% | Field goals | 25-58 43% |
| 10-30 33% | 3-pointers | 7-28 25% |
| 13-17 76% | Free throws | 11-13 85% |
| 39 13 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 12 | Assists | 12 |
| 8 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 1 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 18 | Fouls | 15 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| WAKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juke Harris G | 39 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 12-19 | 6-12 |
| Tre'Von Spillers F | 34 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-2 |
| Omaha Biliew F | 28 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-5 |
| Isaac Carr G | 26 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Myles Colvin G | 18 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-9 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mekhi Mason G | 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Cooper Schwieger F | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Sebastian Akins G | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Nate Calmese G | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| Marqus Marion F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Anson Beard Jr., Dimitrije Kovacevic, Jaylen Cross, Will Underwood, Vincent Ricchiuti, Owen Kmety
| BC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Payne G | 36 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 8-20 | 3-11 |
| Boden Kapke F | 34 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
| Chase Forte G | 32 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 |
| Luka Toews G | 31 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-2 |
| Jayden Hastings F | 16 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aidan Shaw F | 30 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4-4 | 1-1 |
| Caleb Steger G | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Donald Hand Jr. G | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
Did not play: Marko Radunovic, Jason Asemota, Will Eggemeier, Nick Petronio, Akbar Waheed III, Jack DiDonna, Jack Bailey, Kany Musungay
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWAKE -3.5
ModelWAKE -5.2
Model edgeWAKE +1.7
L BC covered
Total
Market145.5
Model146.7
Model edgeOver 1.2
L Under
Projected score
WAKE 76 · BC 70.8
WAKE 67 · BC 68
Win probability
WAKE 68%
1st half
Spread
WAKE -3.2
WAKE -7.0
Total
68.7
51 points
Projected score
WAKE 35.9 · BC 32.7
WAKE 29 · BC 22
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWAKE -3.5
no move
CloseWAKE -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open140.5
▲ 5
Close145.5
Up 5 since the open
Moneyline
WAKE -185 · BC +154
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WAKE -3.5 · unchangedmodel WAKE -5
model WAKE -5
Opened 140.5 · closed 145.5 · moved 5 upmodel 146.5
model 146.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
| BC | 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
WAKE 4–2 BCWAKE leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · WAKE has won the last 2 meetings · WAKE 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | BC 66 @ WAKE 72 | WAKE -10.5 | BC W |
| Jan 2, 2023-24 | WAKE 84 @ BC 78 | BC +1.5 | WAKE W |
| Feb 28, 2022-23 | BC 71 @ WAKE 69 | WAKE -7.5 | BC W |
| Jan 14, 2022-23 | WAKE 85 @ BC 63 | BC +2.5 | WAKE W |
| Mar 9, 2021-22 | BC 82 vs WAKE 77 | WAKE -9.5 | BC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wake Forest
27 games played
Straight up
14-13
52% wins
Against the spread
11-16
41% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs AMER | W 88-74 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs MORE | W 81-65 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | vs MICH | L 84-85 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs UML | W 109-75 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 20 | vs TTU | L 83-84 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs MEM | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs CAM | W 99-51 | -17.5 | W +30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 28 | vs NE | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs OU | L 68-86 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs WVU | W 75-66 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs QUC | W 111-73 | -18.5 | W +19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | vs LONG | W 71-68 | -24.5 | L −21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs VAN | L 67-98 | +5.5 | L −25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ NCSU | L 57-70 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs VT | W 81-78 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs MIA | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ UNC | L 84-87 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ FSU | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs SMU | L 79-91 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ DUKE | L 69-90 | +19.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ PITT | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vsNCSU | L 78-96 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | vs LOU | L 80-88 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 11 | @ GT | W 83-67 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs STAN | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 18 | vs CLEM | W 85-77 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | @VT | L 63-82 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
−5.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+14.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+3.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+8.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−1.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
+30.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
−4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−22.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
+11.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+19.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−21.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
−25.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−2.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
−2.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
−5.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+7.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−0.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
−13.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
−1.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
−2.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
−12.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+1.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
+12.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
+0.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+12.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−15.5
covered 11didn’t cover 16avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
+22.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+0.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+18.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+6.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−23.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
−9.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
+4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−5.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
−2.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+18.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−24.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
+0.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−32.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
+5.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
+0.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+16.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−31.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
+12.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
+5.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
+5.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
+17.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+5.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
−8.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
−19.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+21.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−5.5
over 16under 11avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boston College
27 games played
Straight up
9-18
33% wins
Against the spread
12-15
44% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-16
41% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ FAU | L 78-83 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 6 | vs CIT | W 76-47 | -15.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | vs CCSU | L 59-60 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | @ TEM | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs HAMP | W 63-52 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | vs DAV | L 49-59 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs TULN | L 90-93 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs HARV | W 73-60 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 3 | vs LSU | L 69-78 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | vs NHVN | W 67-63 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | vs MASS | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | vs FDU | W 72-61 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 28 | vs LEM | W 72-64 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @GT | L 53-65 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 6 | vsNCSU | L 71-79 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @LOU | L 62-75 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 13 | @CLEM | L 50-74 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs SYR | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vsPITT | W 65-62 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | @ ND | L 64-68 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs UVA | L 66-73 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @DUKE | L 49-67 | +26.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 7 | vsMIA | L 68-74 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 11 | vsSTAN | L 64-70 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs CAL | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @FSU | L 72-80 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @SMU | L 70-94 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@FAU
FAUL 78-83
−3.5
6
vsCIT
CITW 76-47
+13.5
11
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-60
−18.5
15
@TEM
TEMW 76-71
+8.5
18
vsHAMP
HAMPW 63-52
−1.5
21
vsDAV
DAVL 49-59
−11.5
23
vsTULN
TULNL 90-93
−5.5
26
vsHARV
HARVW 73-60
+5.5
3
vsLSU
LSUL 69-78
−1.5
6
vsNHVN
NHVNW 67-63
−13.5
10
vsMASS
MASSL 74-76
−3.5
22
vsFDU
FDUW 72-61
−5.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 72-64
−4.5
3
@GT
GTL 53-65
−5.5
6
vsNCSU
NCSUL 71-79
+3.5
10
@LOU
LOUL 62-75
+8.5
13
@CLEM
CLEML 50-74
−8.5
17
vsSYR
SYRW 81-73
+13.5
21
vsPITT
PITTW 65-62
+5.5
24
@ND
NDL 64-68
+3.5
31
vsUVA
UVAL 66-73
+6.5
3
@DUKE
DUKEL 49-67
+8.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 68-74
+2.5
11
vsSTAN
STANL 64-70
−2.5
14
vsCAL
CALL 75-86
−7.5
17
@FSU
FSUL 72-80
+3.5
21
@SMU
SMUL 70-94
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@FAU
FAUL 78-83
+12.5
6
vsCIT
CITW 76-47
−21.5
11
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-60
−17.5
15
@TEM
TEMW 76-71
+4.5
18
vsHAMP
HAMPW 63-52
−20.5
21
vsDAV
DAVL 49-59
−32.5
23
vsTULN
TULNL 90-93
+42.5
26
vsHARV
HARVW 73-60
−5.5
3
vsLSU
LSUL 69-78
−2.5
6
vsNHVN
NHVNW 67-63
+3.5
10
vsMASS
MASSL 74-76
+6.5
22
vsFDU
FDUW 72-61
−8.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 72-64
−10.5
3
@GT
GTL 53-65
−27.5
6
vsNCSU
NCSUL 71-79
+8.5
10
@LOU
LOUL 62-75
−13.5
13
@CLEM
CLEML 50-74
−12.5
17
vsSYR
SYRW 81-73
+12.5
21
vsPITT
PITTW 65-62
−10.5
24
@ND
NDL 64-68
−5.5
31
vsUVA
UVAL 66-73
−2.5
3
@DUKE
DUKEL 49-67
−25.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 68-74
+0.5
11
vsSTAN
STANL 64-70
−5.5
14
vsCAL
CALL 75-86
+16.5
17
@FSU
FSUL 72-80
+3.5
21
@SMU
SMUL 70-94
+13.5
over 11under 16avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wake Forest
14-13 overall · 5-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Virginia Tech63–82
- Wvs Clemson85–77
- Wvs Stanford68–63
- W@ Georgia Tech83–67
- Lvs Louisville80–88
4 days since their last game.
Boston College
9-18 overall · 2-12 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ SMU70–94
- L@ Florida St72–80
- Lvs California75–86
- Lvs Stanford64–70
- Lvs Miami68–74
4 days since their last game.