Merkert Gymnasium · at Stonehill · Conference game
Closing line
MERC -1.5✓ MERC covered by 1.5
Closing total137.5Over by 9.5
| This season | STO | |
|---|---|---|
| 12-16 | Record | 9-19 |
| 18-9 | ATS | 15-13 |
| 13-14 | O/U | 9-19 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MERC 66–65 STO · ✓ MERC (53%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERC | 30 | 32 | 13 | 75 |
| STO | 30 | 32 | 10 | 72 |
1st half: MERC 30, STO 30 (tied). The model had MERC by 0.7 and a total of 61.3 (actual 60).
Team stats
| MERC | STO | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-71 35% | Field goals | 24-64 38% |
| 6-17 35% | 3-pointers | 7-21 33% |
| 19-25 76% | Free throws | 17-28 61% |
| 47 13 off | Rebounds | 48 12 off |
| 13 | Assists | 15 |
| 7 | Steals | 2 |
| 8 | Blocks | 3 |
| 6 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 22 | Fouls | 19 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| MERC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernie Blunt III G | 37 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 5-19 | 1-5 |
| Jake Lemelman G | 35 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 6-16 | 3-4 |
| Qadir Martin F | 26 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 6-10 | 0-0 |
| Christian Gamble G | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Mykolas Ivanauskas F | 15 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| DeShaun Jackson Jr. PG | 31 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-0 |
| Sean Lang G | 23 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Kaden Fuhrmann G | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-4 |
| Cameron Johnson F | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| James Thomas F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Or Faran, Chris Leman, Brady Conner, Emilis Butkus, Vladimir Pavlovic
| STO | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante Hackett G | 43 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 4-17 | 3-9 |
| Chas Stinson G | 40 | 21 | 9 | 2 | 7-19 | 1-4 |
| Ethan Meuser F | 37 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-2 |
| Rex Sunderland G | 36 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Ridvan Tutic F | 30 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 5-8 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Anthony Holden G | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| Trenton Ruth G | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| Raymond Espinal-Guzman F | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Charlie Diamantis, Colin Byrne, Cory Lovell, Norbu Jenpa, Will Batchelder, Pearse McGuinn, Eino Montin, Hermann Koffi
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketMERC -1.5
ModelMERC -1.0
Model edgeSTO +0.5
L MERC covered
Total
Market137.5
Model130.8
Model edgeUnder 6.7
L Over
Projected score
MERC 65.9 · STO 64.9
MERC 75 · STO 72
Win probability
MERC 53%
1st half
Spread
MERC -0.7
tied
Total
61.3
60 points
Projected score
MERC 31 · STO 30.3
MERC 30 · STO 30
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenMERC -1.5
no move
CloseMERC -1.5
No change since the open
Total
Open133.5
▲ 4
Close137.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
MERC -120 · STO +100
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened MERC -1.5 · unchangedmodel MERC -1
model MERC -1
Opened 133.5 · closed 137.5 · moved 4 upmodel 131
model 131
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MERC 1–2 STOSTO leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · STO has won the last 2 meetings · MERC 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | STO 62 @ MERC 57 | MERC -4.5 | STO W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | MERC 73 @ STO 85 | STO -4.5 | STO W |
| Jan 3, 2024-25 | STO 69 @ MERC 76 | MERC +1.5 | MERC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mercyhurst
28 games played
Straight up
12-16
43% wins
Against the spread
18-9
67% covers · avg +3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-14
48% overs · avg +1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-70 | +26.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 73-65 | +21.5 | W +29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 55-58 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 71-76 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 60-69 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 38-70 | +21.5 | L −10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 71-79 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 47-80 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 62-76 | +24.5 | W +10.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-61 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 67-74 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-60 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 58-60 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-62 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-61 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 61-57 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 122.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 61-59 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 70-51 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 122.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-78 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 98-89 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 52-55 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-79 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 80-83 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 78-80 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NU
L 47-70
+3.5
6
@
LUC
W 73-65
+29.5
12
@
CAN
L 55-58
−4.5
15
vs
MORG
W 86-72
+7.5
20
@
M-OH
L 71-76
+10.5
23
@
MRSH
L 60-69
+2.5
30
@
WVU
L 38-70
−10.5
13
@
DAV
L 47-80
−21.5
17
@
SYR
L 62-76
+10.5
20
vs
BING
W 82-61
+13.5
2
vs
FDU
L 67-74
−12.5
4
vs
LEM
W 74-60
+11.5
8
@
LIU
L 58-60
+6.5
10
@
WAG
W 70-69
+2.5
17
vs
STO
L 57-62
−9.5
19
vs
CCSU
W 79-61
+16.5
23
@
NHVN
W 61-57
+2.5
25
vs
CHST
W 61-59
−7.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 70-51
+13.5
31
@
CHST
L 74-78
−6.5
5
vs
SFPA
W 98-89
+2.5
7
@
FDU
L 52-55
−0.5
12
@
LEM
L 57-58
+1.5
14
@
SFPA
W 94-79
+12.5
19
vs
WAG
L 80-83
−6.5
21
vs
LIU
W 91-83
+11.5
26
@
CCSU
L 78-80
+1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 9avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NU
L 47-70
−23.5
6
@
LUC
W 73-65
−6.5
12
@
CAN
L 55-58
−22.5
15
vs
MORG
W 86-72
+11.5
20
@
M-OH
L 71-76
+7.5
23
@
MRSH
L 60-69
−18.5
30
@
WVU
L 38-70
−19.5
13
@
DAV
L 47-80
−5.5
17
@
SYR
L 62-76
+6.5
20
vs
BING
W 82-61
+10.5
2
vs
FDU
L 67-74
+7.5
4
vs
LEM
W 74-60
−7.5
8
@
LIU
L 58-60
−21.5
10
@
WAG
W 70-69
+6.5
17
vs
STO
L 57-62
−9.5
19
vs
CCSU
W 79-61
+7.5
23
@
NHVN
W 61-57
−4.5
25
vs
CHST
W 61-59
−11.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 70-51
−1.5
31
@
CHST
L 74-78
+22.5
5
vs
SFPA
W 98-89
+49.5
7
@
FDU
L 52-55
−24.5
12
@
LEM
L 57-58
−23.5
14
@
SFPA
W 94-79
+34.5
19
vs
WAG
L 80-83
+29.5
21
vs
LIU
W 91-83
+33.5
26
@
CCSU
L 78-80
+16.5
over 13under 14avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Stonehill
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg 0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-19
32% overs · avg −4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-72 | +22.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-80 | +16.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 71-73 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 57-96 | +40.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-75 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 62-76 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 65-77 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 58-59 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 48-77 | +22.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 55-70 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 69-60 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 69-76 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 85-82 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 62-57 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-63 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 63-66 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 61-59 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-54 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-61 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 55-68 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 131.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-68 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 51-64 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 121.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 77-68 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 103-77 | -4.5 | W +21.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
DEP
L 64-72
+14.5
11
@
URI
L 57-80
−6.5
14
@
FAIR
L 71-73
+4.5
15
vs
L-MD
L 63-74
−4.5
17
@
ISU
L 57-96
+1.5
21
vs
LAF
W 74-70
+5.5
26
vs
UML
L 64-75
−13.5
30
@
QUIN
L 62-76
+1.5
2
@
BRY
L 65-77
−5.5
17
@
UNH
L 58-59
+2.5
22
@
SYR
L 48-77
−6.5
2
vs
NHVN
L 55-70
−16.5
4
@
WAG
W 69-60
+16.5
8
@
CCSU
L 69-76
+0.5
10
vs
CHST
W 85-82
−1.5
17
@
MERC
W 62-57
+9.5
19
@
SFPA
L 61-63
−0.5
23
vs
LIU
L 63-66
+2.5
26
vs
CCSU
W 61-59
+3.5
29
vs
FDU
W 58-57
−1.5
31
@
LEM
W 65-54
+13.5
5
@
FDU
L 58-74
−14.5
7
@
LIU
L 54-61
+3.5
12
@
CHST
L 55-68
−15.5
14
vs
WAG
L 57-68
−14.5
19
@
NHVN
L 51-64
−10.5
21
vs
LEM
W 77-68
+10.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 103-77
+21.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
DEP
L 64-72
−11.5
11
@
URI
L 57-80
−14.5
14
@
FAIR
L 71-73
+0.5
15
vs
L-MD
L 63-74
−1.5
17
@
ISU
L 57-96
+6.5
21
vs
LAF
W 74-70
+2.5
26
vs
UML
L 64-75
−9.5
30
@
QUIN
L 62-76
−10.5
2
@
BRY
L 65-77
+7.5
17
@
UNH
L 58-59
−21.5
22
@
SYR
L 48-77
−15.5
2
vs
NHVN
L 55-70
−3.5
4
@
WAG
W 69-60
−10.5
8
@
CCSU
L 69-76
+10.5
10
vs
CHST
W 85-82
+31.5
17
@
MERC
W 62-57
−9.5
19
@
SFPA
L 61-63
−17.5
23
vs
LIU
L 63-66
−8.5
26
vs
CCSU
W 61-59
−15.5
29
vs
FDU
W 58-57
−16.5
31
@
LEM
W 65-54
−21.5
5
@
FDU
L 58-74
+1.5
7
@
LIU
L 54-61
−17.5
12
@
CHST
L 55-68
−8.5
14
vs
WAG
L 57-68
−3.5
19
@
NHVN
L 51-64
−6.5
21
vs
LEM
W 77-68
+7.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 103-77
+39.5
over 9under 19avg −4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mercyhurst
12-16 overall · 9-8 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ C Connecticut78–80
- Wvs Long Island91–83
- Lvs Wagner80–83
- W@ Saint Francis Red Wolves94–79
- L@ Le Moyne57–58
2 days since their last game.
Stonehill
9-19 overall · 8-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves103–77
- Wvs Le Moyne77–68
- L@ New Haven51–64
- Lvs Wagner57–68
- L@ Chicago St55–68
2 days since their last game.