United Center · at Bulls
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 1-5 |
| 4-2 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAL 124–116 · win probability DAL 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 239.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
DAL 3, CHI 3 · 2026-27 so far
Shooting
Effective FG%: DAL 56.9 and allows 51.3; CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0
Three-pointers
DAL hits 35.1% and allows 29.7%; CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%. Threes are 42.1% and 47.9% of their shots
DAL offense vs CHI defense
Offense 16th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DAL has played the 2nd-hardest schedule, CHI the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 106 possessions: DAL plays 102.8 a game (18th fastest), CHI 109.8 (1st). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: DAL 21.4, CHI 38.3. Allowed: DAL 27.2, CHI 33.5
Home court
CHI at home. This season: CHI 0-2 at home, DAL 2-1 away
CHI offense vs DAL defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 16th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DAL 16.8%, CHI 16.2%. Forced: DAL 14.5%, CHI 14.7%
Even
Recent form
Last 5: DAL 4-1 ATS, margin +6.6; CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DAL 27.8%, CHI 29.2%. Defensive: DAL 69.4%, CHI 69.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DAL 100%, CHI 100%. Transfers in: DAL 0, CHI 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelDAL -7.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model239.1
Model edge—
Projected score
DAL 123.5 · CHI 115.6
Win probability
DAL 71%
1st half
Spread
DAL -4.6
Total
119.4
Projected score
DAL 62 · CHI 57.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
DAL 6–4 CHIDAL leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · DAL 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2025-26 | CHI 128 @ DAL 149 | DAL -5.5 | DAL W |
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | DAL 107 @ CHI 125 | CHI -4.5 | CHI W |
| Mar 29, 2024-25 | DAL 120 @ CHI 119 | CHI -2.5 | DAL W |
| Nov 6, 2024-25 | CHI 99 @ DAL 119 | DAL -10.5 | DAL W |
| Mar 11, 2023-24 | DAL 127 @ CHI 92 | CHI +3.5 | DAL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mavericks
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +10.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
HOU
L 110-128
−8.5
23
@
IND
W 121-105
+23.5
24
vs
SA
L 106-122
−1.5
26
@
MIA
W 113-109
+11.5
28
vs
OKC
W 120-96
+28.5
30
vs
HOU
W 116-111
+10.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +10.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
HOU
L 110-128
+7.5
23
@
IND
W 121-105
−15.5
24
vs
SA
L 106-122
−1.5
26
@
MIA
W 113-109
−18.5
28
vs
OKC
W 120-96
−11.5
30
vs
HOU
W 116-111
+3.5
over 2under 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mavericks has the better starters
Position by position: Mavericks 4, Bulls 1, even 0
MavericksBetterBulls
G M. Christie8.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 9
→CHIBig
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
F P. Washington13.8 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 78
←DALBig
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
F C. Flagg26.8 pts · 6 reb · 6.6 ast
Score 49
←DALBig
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
F Z. Risacher9.5 pts · 6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 65
←DALBig
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
F D. Gafford8.5 pts · 7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 46
←DALSmall
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
MavericksBetterBulls
DAL offense16th of 30 · +0.6
←DALBig
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
DAL defense16th of 30 · -0.1
=Even
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
Backcourt-6.6 · 1 player
→CHIBig
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+16.0 · 4 players
←DALBig
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
Bench+2.7 · 5 players
←DALBig
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDAL betterCHI betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Christie27 minM. Sasser19 minJ. Howard12 min
Forwards
P. Washington34 minC. Flagg32 minZ. Risacher30 minD. Gafford24 minN. Marshall28 minC. Martin20 min
Centers
M. Cisse14 min
Out
S. de LarreaOutK. IrvingDay-To-Day
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 114.3 #14 | Points per game | 113.5 #16 |
| 1.12 #11 | Points per possession | 1.04 #26 |
| 102.8 #18 | Pace (possessions) | 109.8 #1 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.9 #2 | Effective FG% | 48.2 #30 |
| 35.1 #14 | 3-point % | 28.1 #30 |
| 42.1 #18 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #4 |
| 21.4 #29 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #1 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #23 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #20 |
| 27.8 #13 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #9 |
| 27.0 #12 | Assists per game | 24.3 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 111.8 #14 | Points allowed | 129.3 #30 |
| 1.08 #13 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #27 |
| 51.3 #9 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.0 #26 |
| 29.7 #2 | Opponent 3-point % | 39.3 #28 |
| 14.5 #24 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #21 |
| 69.4 #25 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #24 |
| 8.8 #16 | Steals per game | 8.7 #17 |
| 6.8 #2 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #12 |
Mavericks
4-2 overall · 2-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Rockets116–111
- Wvs Thunder120–96
- W@ Heat113–109
- Lvs Spurs106–122
- W@ Pacers121–105
A week or more of rest.
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.