Paycom Center · at Thunder
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKC | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-2 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 1-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKC 123–109 · win probability OKC 85%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 232.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OKC has more of the edges
CHI 0, OKC 6 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: CHI plays 109.8 a game (1st fastest), OKC 101.1 (27th). Faster games mean more points
OKC offense vs CHI defense
Offense 18th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0; OKC 49.5 and allows 51.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CHI 16.2%, OKC 14.5%. Forced: CHI 14.7%, OKC 15.8%
CHI offense vs OKC defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CHI has played the 14th-hardest schedule, OKC the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%; OKC hits 30.9% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 47.9% and 35.8% of their shots
Home court
OKC at home. This season: OKC 3-0 at home, CHI 1-3 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CHI 38.3, OKC 21.8. Allowed: CHI 33.5, OKC 23.4
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4; OKC 2-3 ATS, margin -3.0
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CHI 29.2%, OKC 28.5%. Defensive: CHI 69.8%, OKC 71.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CHI 100%, OKC 100%. Transfers in: CHI 0, OKC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelOKC -14.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model232.0
Model edge—
Projected score
CHI 108.8 · OKC 123.3
Win probability
OKC 85%
1st half
Spread
OKC -8.0
Total
116.1
Projected score
CHI 54 · OKC 62.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% | |
| 4-2 67% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
CHI 2–8 OKCOKC leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · OKC has won the last 8 meetings · CHI 2-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025-26 | CHI 113 @ OKC 131 | OKC -18.5 | CHI W |
| Mar 3, 2025-26 | OKC 116 @ CHI 108 | CHI +9.5 | CHI W |
| Mar 31, 2024-25 | CHI 117 @ OKC 145 | OKC -15.5 | OKC W |
| Oct 26, 2024-25 | OKC 114 @ CHI 95 | CHI +9.5 | OKC W |
| Nov 22, 2023-24 | CHI 102 @ OKC 116 | OKC -6.5 | OKC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Thunder
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −12.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
+10.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
+4.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−9.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+2.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−28.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−18.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
−9.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
−56.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−14.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+17.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−11.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−2.5
over 1under 5avg −12.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Thunder has the better starters
Position by position: Bulls 0, Thunder 4, even 1
BullsBetterThunder
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
→OKCSmall
G S. Gilgeous-Alexander26 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 88
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
→OKCBig
G A. Mitchell16.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
=Even
G J. McCain10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 8
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
→OKCBig
G K. Williams5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
→OKCBig
C I. Hartenstein9.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
BullsBetterThunder
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
→OKCSmall
OKC defense2nd of 30 · +6.2
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
→OKCBig
OKC offense18th of 30 · -1.1
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
→OKCBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
→OKCBig
Frontcourt+12.0 · 1 player
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
→OKCSmall
Bench-4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCHI betterOKC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Guards
S. Gilgeous-Alexander33 minA. Mitchell26 minJ. McCain25 minK. Williams14 minJ. Dix18 minB. Stirtz16 min
Forwards
J. Williams18 minB. Barnhizer9 min
Centers
I. Hartenstein24 minA. Mara18 min
Out
A. CarusoOutC. HolmgrenOutJ. WilliamsOutC. WallaceOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.5 #16 | Points per game | 106.5 #29 |
| 1.04 #26 | Points per possession | 1.05 #23 |
| 109.8 #1 | Pace (possessions) | 101.1 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.2 #30 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #28 |
| 28.1 #30 | 3-point % | 30.9 #26 |
| 47.9 #4 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #29 |
| 38.3 #1 | Free throw rate | 21.8 #28 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #20 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #7 |
| 29.2 #9 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.5 #10 |
| 24.3 #25 | Assists per game | 21.7 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 129.3 #30 | Points allowed | 107.0 #5 |
| 1.17 #27 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #7 |
| 56.0 #26 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #6 |
| 39.3 #28 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #17 |
| 14.7 #21 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #13 |
| 69.8 #24 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #18 |
| 8.7 #17 | Steals per game | 8.3 #20 |
| 5.0 #12 | Blocks per game | 6.3 #7 |
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.
Thunder
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Rockets98–119
- L@ Mavericks96–120
- Wvs Suns125–114
- Wvs Clippers108–101
- Wvs Nuggets96–84
A week or more of rest.