Kaseya Center · at Heat · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLE 121–118 · win probability CLE 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 238.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLE has more of the edges
CLE 4, MIA 3 · 2026-27 so far
CLE offense vs MIA defense
Offense 2nd of 30 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
MIA offense vs CLE defense
Offense 1st of 30 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
CLE hits 37.0% and allows 33.7%; MIA hits 34.1% and allows 40.6%. Threes are 43.6% and 41.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
CLE has played the 24th-hardest schedule, MIA the 11th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: CLE 55.3 and allows 52.5; MIA 54.6 and allows 56.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CLE 26.7%, MIA 24.5%. Defensive: CLE 73.9%, MIA 72.3%
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 1-3 at home, CLE 1-2 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CLE 14.2%, MIA 14.1%. Forced: CLE 14.1%, MIA 15.4%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CLE 28.9, MIA 27.3. Allowed: CLE 23.2, MIA 23.2
Context
Tempo
About 106 possessions: CLE plays 106.2 a game (3rd fastest), MIA 106.2 (5th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CLE 2-3 ATS, margin +7.6; MIA 2-3 ATS, margin +1.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CLE 100%, MIA 100%. Transfers in: CLE 0, MIA 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelCLE -2.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model238.6
Model edge—
Projected score
CLE 120.5 · MIA 118.2
Win probability
CLE 56%
1st half
Spread
CLE -1.4
Total
119.2
Projected score
CLE 60.3 · MIA 58.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 22 since 2021-22
CLE 13–9 MIACLE leads · 22 games since 2021-22 · CLE 11-11 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025-26 | MIA 128 @ CLE 149 | CLE -5.5 | CLE W |
| Mar 25, 2025-26 | MIA 120 @ CLE 103 | CLE -2.5 | MIA W |
| Nov 12, 2025-26 | CLE 130 @ MIA 116 | MIA -4.5 | CLE W |
| Nov 10, 2025-26 | CLE 138 @ MIA 140 | MIA +7.5 | MIA W |
| Apr 28, 2024-25 | CLE 138 @ MIA 83 | MIA +8.5 | CLE W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cavaliers
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−5.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
−7.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
−1.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
+0.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−1.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−17.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
+17.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
+17.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
−8.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−12.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+12.5
over 3under 3avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Heat
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−26.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
−14.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−9.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−11.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+14.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+11.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−3.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
+3.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−2.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−18.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+2.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+33.5
over 3under 3avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cavaliers has the better starters
Position by position: Cavaliers 2, Heat 1, even 2
CavaliersBetterHeat
G J. Harden16.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 53
=Even
G D. Mitchell16.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 8.2 ast
Score 48
G D. Mitchell22.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 86
←CLEBig
G K. Thompson10.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 20
G S. Merrill8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
=Even
F G. Antetokounmpo28.2 pts · 12.3 reb · 5.5 ast
Score 89
C E. Mobley19.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 30
→MIASmall
F A. Wiggins10.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 62
C J. Allen15.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 100
←CLESmall
C B. Adebayo16.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
CavaliersBetterHeat
CLE offense2nd of 30 · +4.0
←CLEBig
MIA defense26th of 30 · -5.2
CLE defense20th of 30 · -1.2
→MIABig
MIA offense1st of 30 · +4.9
Backcourt+25.3 · 3 players
←CLEBig
Backcourt+0.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.9 · 2 players
→MIABig
Frontcourt+23.1 · 3 players
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
←CLEBig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCLE betterMIA betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Harden34 minD. Mitchell33 minS. Merrill24 minM. Thomas21 minT. Proctor12 minC. Porter8 min
Forwards
M. Hezonja18 minT. Enaruna10 minR. Minix7 min
Centers
E. Mobley33 minJ. Allen28 minT. Bryant11 minE. UdehNew
Out
P. WatsonDay-To-DayJ. TysonOut
Guards
D. Mitchell34 minK. Thompson21 minP. Larsson30 minD. Smith10 minR. Conwell4 min
Forwards
G. Antetokounmpo32 minA. Wiggins27 minB. Portis23 minS. Fontecchio17 minN. Jovic13 minM. Gardner9 min
Centers
B. Adebayo32 minN. Richards15 min
Out
T. HardawayDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.0 #2 | Points per game | 118.3 #9 |
| 1.14 #7 | Points per possession | 1.11 #14 |
| 106.2 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #5 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #7 | Effective FG% | 54.6 #12 |
| 37.0 #8 | 3-point % | 34.1 #19 |
| 43.6 #12 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #20 |
| 28.9 #13 | Free throw rate | 27.3 #19 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #6 | Turnover rate | 14.1 #5 |
| 26.7 #20 | Offensive rebound rate | 24.5 #24 |
| 28.7 #4 | Assists per game | 28.8 #3 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #20 | Points allowed | 121.5 #26 |
| 1.09 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #26 |
| 52.5 #12 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.8 #27 |
| 33.7 #11 | Opponent 3-point % | 40.6 #29 |
| 14.1 #25 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #18 |
| 73.9 #11 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #17 |
| 7.8 #22 | Steals per game | 8.3 #19 |
| 6.3 #6 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #13 |
Cavaliers
4-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Bucks136–111
- L@ Hawks111–114
- Wvs Wizards121–111
- Wvs Timberwolves127–125
- Wvs Nets125–121
A week or more of rest.
Heat
2-4 overall · 2-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Pacers145–125
- W@ Hawks129–117
- Lvs Mavericks109–113
- L@ Hornets110–115
- Lvs Pistons111–128
A week or more of rest.