Atlantic Coast ConferencePower #9221-12 SU17-16 ATS14-19 O/U
California went 21-12 straight up, 17-16 against the spread (52% covers, average cover margin +1.7 points), 14-19 on over/unders in 2025-26, including 9-9 ATS as a favorite and 8-7 ATS as an underdog.
Last 5 (result · ATS · O/U):WWU·LLU·LLO·WWO·LLU
Cover margin by gameTotal margin by game
Points by which CAL beat (up) or missed (down) its closing linePoints the final score landed over (up) or under (down) the closing total
+11.5
CSUB−4.5
WRST+5.5
CSUF+3.5
@KSU−0.5
PRES+2.5
SAC+15.5
UCLA−0.5
UTAH−1.5
PAC−10.5
NWST+20.5
MORG+9.5
COLU−12.5
LOU−2.5
ND−9.5
@UVA+2.5
@VT−0.5
DUKE+13.5
UNC+16.5
@STAN+1.5
@FSU+12.5
@MIA−2.5
GT−17.5
CLEM−0.5
@SYR+7.5
@BC+4.5STAN+8.5
SMU−22.5
PITT+8.5@GT−1.5
@WAKE−4.5FSU+11.5
UIC−6.5
JOES
CSUB−4.5WRST+5.5CSUF+3.5@KSU−0.5PRES+2.5SAC+15.5UCLA−0.5UTAH−1.5PAC−10.5NWST+20.5MORG+9.5COLU−12.5LOU−2.5ND−9.5@UVA+2.5@VT−0.5DUKE+13.5UNC+16.5@STAN+1.5@FSU+12.5@MIA−2.5GT−17.5CLEM−0.5@SYR+7.5@BC+4.5STAN+8.5SMU−22.5PITT+8.5@GT−1.5@WAKE−4.5FSU+11.5UIC−6.5JOEScovered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.7 ptstaller = bigger margin
−0.5CSUB−4.5WRST−4.5CSUF+30.5@KSU−0.5PRES+3.5SAC+8.5UCLA−1.5UTAH−16.5PAC+3.5NWST−4.5MORG−23.5COLU+0.5LOU+4.5ND−4.5@UVA+4.5@VT−22.5DUKE+10.5UNC−2.5@STAN−33.5@FSU+22.5@MIA+22.5GT−7.5CLEM+58.5@SYR+16.5@BC−11.5STAN−21.5SMU−15.5PITT−13.5@GT−1.5@WAKE+29.5FSU+13.5UIC−1.5JOES
CSUB−4.5WRST−4.5CSUF+30.5@KSU−0.5PRES+3.5SAC+8.5UCLA−1.5UTAH−16.5PAC+3.5NWST−4.5MORG−23.5COLU+0.5LOU+4.5ND−4.5@UVA+4.5@VT−22.5DUKE+10.5UNC−2.5@STAN−33.5@FSU+22.5@MIA+22.5GT−7.5CLEM+58.5@SYR+16.5@BC−11.5STAN−21.5SMU−15.5PITT−13.5@GT−1.5@WAKE+29.5FSU+13.5UIC−1.5JOESover 14under 19avg +1.1 ptstaller = bigger margin
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers
Avg cover margin
+1.7
points vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs
Points for / against
77.7 / 73.4
per game
California 2025-26 team stats
33 games · rank among 365 teams · a longer bar is a better rank
Scoring
Points per game77.7 #99
Points per possession1.11 #118
Pace (possessions)69.8 #126
Shooting
Effective FG%52.6 #119
3-point %36.9 #30
3-point attempt rate43.1 #111
Free throw rate36.2 #146
Possessions
Turnover rate15.1 #74
Offensive rebound rate26.0 #322
Assists per game14.1 #142
Defense
Points allowed73.4 #140
Points allowed per possession1.05 #92
Opponent effective FG%49.8 #91
Opponent 3-point %31.0 #34
Turnovers forced16.1 #216
Defensive rebound rate69.5 #180
Steals per game5.9 #244
Blocks per game3.0 #217
California 2025-26 schedule, lines & results
33 played · 0 to go
| Date | Opponent | Line | Total | Result | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | Bakersfield non-conf | -15.5 | 147.5 | W 87-60 | W +11.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 6 | Wright St non-conf | -14.5 | 148.5 | W 77-67 | L -4.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 10 | Fullerton non-conf | -22.5 | 162.5 | W 93-65 | W +5.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 13 | @ Kansas St non-conf | +6.5 | 164.5 | L 96-99 | W +3.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 18 | Presbyterian non-conf | -10.5 | 124.5 | W 67-57 | L -0.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | Sacramento St non-conf | -21.5 | 154.5 | W 91-67 | W +2.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | #18UCLA non-conf (N) | +7.5 | 143.5 | W 80-72 | W +15.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | Utah non-conf | -7.5 | 152.5 | W 79-72 | L -0.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | Pacific non-conf | -7.5 | 144.5 | W 67-61 | L -1.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | N'Western St non-conf | -19.5 | 145.5 | W 79-70 | L -10.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 19 | Morgan St non-conf | -26.5 | 151.5 | W 97-50 | W +20.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | Columbia non-conf | -8.5 | 153.5 | W 74-56 | W +9.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 30 | #16Louisville | +7.5 | 159.5 | L 70-90 | L -12.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 2 | Notre Dame | -3.5 | 138.5 | W 72-71 | L -2.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 7 | @ #23Virginia | +14.5 | 148.5 | L 60-84 | L -9.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ Virginia Tech | +5.5 | 148.5 | L 75-78 | W +2.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | #6Duke | +14.5 | 149.5 | L 56-71 | L -0.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | #14North Carolina | +7.5 | 151.5 | W 84-78 | W +13.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | @ Stanford | +4.5 | 146.5 | W 78-66 | W +16.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ Florida St | +3.5 | 157.5 | L 61-63 | W +1.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ Miami | +11.5 | 148.5 | W 86-85 | W +12.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | Georgia Tech | -7.5 | 152.5 | W 90-85 | L -2.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 7 | #20Clemson | +4.5 | 139.5 | L 55-77 | L -17.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 11 | @ Syracuse | +6.5 | 148.5 | L 100-107 | L -0.5 | O 207 |
| Feb 14 | @ Boston College | -3.5 | 144.5 | W 86-75 | W +7.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | Stanford | -1.5 | 149.5 | W 72-66 | W +4.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | SMU | +4.5 | 163.5 | W 73-69 | W +8.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | Pitt | -6.5 | 143.5 | L 56-72 | L -22.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 4 | @ Georgia Tech | -2.5 | 154.5 | W 76-65 | W +8.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ Wake Forest | +5.5 | 154.5 | L 73-80 | L -1.5 | U 153 |
| Mar 11 | Florida St (N) | +1.5 | 154.5 | L 89-95 | L -4.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 18 | UIC non-conf | -6.5 | 150.5 | W 91-73 | W +11.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | Saint Joseph's non-conf | -5.5 | 152.5 | L 75-76 | L -6.5 | U 151 |
California 2025-26 ATS and over/under splits
Home, away, favorite, underdog and conference
| Situation | SU | ATS | Cover % | Avg margin | O/U | PF | PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All games | 21-12 | 17-16 | 52% | +1.7 | 14-19 | 77.7 | 73.4 |
| Home | 16-5 | 9-12 | 43% | +0.3 | 7-14 | 76.4 | 69.2 |
| Away | 4-6 | 7-3 | 70% | +4.1 | 5-5 | 79.1 | 80.2 |
| Neutral site | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% | +5.5 | 2-0 | 84.5 | 83.5 |
| As favorite | 16-2 | 9-9 | 50% | +1.7 | 6-12 | 79.4 | 67.1 |
| As underdog | 5-10 | 8-7 | 53% | +1.8 | 8-7 | 75.7 | 80.9 |
| In conference | 9-10 | 9-10 | 47% | +0.1 | 9-10 | 74.3 | 77.7 |
| Non-conference | 12-2 | 8-6 | 57% | +4.0 | 5-9 | 82.4 | 67.5 |
How California’s games played out
By the score at halftime
Led at halftime19 games · won 17 · covered 12
Trailed at halftime11 games · won 3 · covered 4
Tied at halftime3 games · won 1 · covered 1