H&PE Arena · at Texas Southern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TXSO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TAR 77–71 · win probability TAR 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TAR has more of the edges
TAR 3, TXSO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
TXSO offense vs TAR defense
Offense 311th of 366 against a defense 186th, on the model’s ratings
TAR offense vs TXSO defense
Offense 200th of 366 against a defense 323rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TAR has played the 212th-hardest schedule, TXSO the 329th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TAR 19.9%, TXSO 18.5%. Forced: TAR 23.5%, TXSO 16.5%
Home court
TXSO at home. This season: TXSO 0-0 at home, TAR 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: TAR 48.3 and allows 53.6; TXSO 49.7 and allows 52.5
Even
Three-pointers
TAR hits 32.5% and allows 34.9%; TXSO hits 33.1% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 24.2% and 32.5% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TAR 23%, TXSO 37%. Transfers in: TAR 7, TXSO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TAR 41.9, TXSO 38.2. Allowed: TAR 47.7, TXSO 44.0
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TAR 31.5%, TXSO 28.8%. Defensive: TAR 64.9%, TXSO 68.8%
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: TAR plays 71.2 a game (64th fastest), TXSO 71.8 (40th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TAR -6.3 | — |
| Total | — | 147.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | TAR 77.1 · TXSO 70.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TAR -3.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | TAR 36.5 · TXSO 32.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TAR 1–0 TXSOTAR leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TAR 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2023-24 | TXSO 71 @ TAR 82 | TAR -10 | TAR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tarleton St
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 76-96 | +21.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 60-96 | +15.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 76-62 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 81-94 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 90-74 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 58-76 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 88-64 | -17.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 78-54 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 69-63 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 85-91 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 80-84 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 105-106 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-71 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 55-83 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-65 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-56 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 62-59 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 59-73 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 65-62 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-74 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 72-80 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-79 | +17.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-82 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 78-84 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SMU
L 76-96
+1.5
5
@
LSU
L 60-96
−20.5
8
vs
AMCC
W 85-77
+4.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-62
+9.5
14
@
BAY
L 81-94
+10.5
20
@
RICE
W 90-74
+20.5
1
@
CIN
L 58-76
+6.5
16
@
MVSU
W 88-64
+6.5
19
vs
FAMU
W 78-54
+9.5
29
@
UTA
W 69-63
+8.5
1
vs
UVU
L 85-91
−0.5
3
vs
CBU
W 81-76
+3.5
8
vs
ACU
L 80-84
−8.5
15
@
SUU
L 105-106
−4.5
17
@
UTU
L 71-75
−0.5
21
@
UTA
L 64-71
−3.5
29
vs
UVU
L 55-83
−21.5
31
vs
UTU
L 59-65
−7.5
5
@
CBU
L 55-56
+9.5
7
@
SUU
W 62-59
+1.5
14
@
ACU
L 59-73
−10.5
16
vs
ACU
W 65-62
+4.5
19
vs
SUU
W 78-74
−0.5
21
vs
UTU
L 72-80
−9.5
26
@
UVU
L 72-79
+10.5
28
@
CBU
L 67-82
−6.5
5
vs
UTA
L 60-65
−6.5
11
vs
ACU
L 78-84
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SMU
L 76-96
+27.5
5
@
LSU
L 60-96
+7.5
8
vs
AMCC
W 85-77
+19.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-62
−4.5
14
@
BAY
L 81-94
+25.5
20
@
RICE
W 90-74
+17.5
1
@
CIN
L 58-76
−8.5
16
@
MVSU
W 88-64
+9.5
19
vs
FAMU
W 78-54
−13.5
29
@
UTA
W 69-63
−4.5
1
vs
UVU
L 85-91
+31.5
3
vs
CBU
W 81-76
+9.5
8
vs
ACU
L 80-84
+23.5
15
@
SUU
L 105-106
+60.5
17
@
UTU
L 71-75
−4.5
21
@
UTA
L 64-71
−7.5
29
vs
UVU
L 55-83
−16.5
31
vs
UTU
L 59-65
−25.5
5
@
CBU
L 55-56
−27.5
7
@
SUU
W 62-59
−28.5
14
@
ACU
L 59-73
−2.5
16
vs
ACU
W 65-62
−7.5
19
vs
SUU
W 78-74
+7.5
21
vs
UTU
L 72-80
+11.5
26
@
UVU
L 72-79
+9.5
28
@
CBU
L 67-82
+9.5
5
vs
UTA
L 60-65
−11.5
11
vs
ACU
L 78-84
+27.5
over 15under 13avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas Southern
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
9-19
32% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 43-98 | +29.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-104 | +29.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-77 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 74-109 | +36.5 | W +1.5 | 164.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-89 | +21.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 72-108 | +34.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 67-84 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-74 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-51 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 89-94 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 96-64 | -2.5 | W +29.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-85 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 62-57 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 74-73 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 83-64 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-72 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 92-87 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-57 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 59-70 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-85 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−25.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
−4.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−5.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+1.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−4.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−14.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
−1.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
−2.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
−4.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
−11.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−9.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
+20.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
−2.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+16.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+29.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
−8.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
+6.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−2.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+1.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
+5.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
+20.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−12.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
−0.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
+18.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−12.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
−9.5
covered 9didn’t cover 19avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−16.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
+12.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
+29.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−0.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+18.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−6.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
+27.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
+4.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
+3.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
+4.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−22.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
−7.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−3.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
+29.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+17.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+4.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
+5.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
−27.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−4.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+21.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
−4.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
−5.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−0.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
+33.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
−13.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−25.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
+16.5
over 14under 14avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tarleton St has the better starters
Position by position: Tarleton St 3, Texas Southern 0, even 2
Tarleton StBetterTexas Southern
G C. Blackwell TR10.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 52
←TARSmall
G K. Bilal TR5.6 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 23
G F. Emmou TR7.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 36
=No call
G C. Patterson6.4 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
G L. Kelly5.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 41
=No call
G B. Vungo TR3.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
G T. Cope TR8.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 47
←TARBig
F A. Andrews2.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 7
F I. Harrell TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 23
←TARSmall
C J. Gorecki2.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
Tarleton StBetterTexas Southern
TAR offense200th of 366 · -6.3
←TARSmall
TXSO defense323rd of 366 · -8.4
TAR defense186th of 366 · -4.3
←TARSmall
TXSO offense311th of 366 · -9.7
Backcourt-3.3 · 4 players
→TXSOSmall
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
←TARSmall
Frontcourt-4.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.5 · 5 players
←TARBig
Bench-4.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTAR betterTXSO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Blackwell31 min · TRF. Emmou23 min · TRL. Kelly21 minT. Cope21 min · TRK. Douglas16 minJ. Martinez2 min
Forwards
I. Harrell26 min · TRJ. Daniel19 min · TRJ. Hayes13 min · TRJ. Mani12 min · TRM. Vrabel7 minE. CarterNew
Guards
K. Bilal21 min · TRC. Patterson16 minB. Vungo12 min · TRA. Nedal12 minJ. Hamilton7 minJ. Kimbrough4 min · TR
Forwards
A. Andrews13 minJ. Akpovwa9 minX. Wedlow3 min · TRJ. FarmerNew
Centers
J. Gorecki17 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.5 #231 | Points per game | 73.9 #204 |
| 1.01 #309 | Points per possession | 1.03 #293 |
| 71.2 #64 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #40 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.3 #306 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #251 |
| 32.5 #256 | 3-point % | 33.1 #224 |
| 24.2 #365 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.5 #324 |
| 41.9 #33 | Free throw rate | 38.2 #96 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.9 #348 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #297 |
| 31.5 #141 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #237 |
| 10.5 #349 | Assists per game | 11.1 #332 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.8 #211 | Points allowed | 80.0 #318 |
| 1.07 #130 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #260 |
| 53.6 #285 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #240 |
| 34.9 #244 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #190 |
| 23.5 #2 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #188 |
| 64.9 #340 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.8 #211 |
| 9.7 #3 | Steals per game | 6.6 #167 |
| 3.1 #206 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #173 |
Tarleton St
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Abilene Chrstn78–84
- Lvs UT Arlington60–65
- L@ CA Baptist67–82
- L@ Utah Valley72–79
- Lvs Utah Tech72–80
A week or more of rest.
Texas Southern
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alabama A&M74–85
- Lvs Prairie View59–70
- Wvs Jackson St82–57
- Wvs Alcorn St92–87
- L@ Miss Valley St71–72
A week or more of rest.