H&PE Arena · at Texas Southern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TXSO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NOLA 77–74 · win probability NOLA 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NOLA has more of the edges
NOLA 4, TXSO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NOLA has played the 173rd-hardest schedule, TXSO the 329th. A record against a soft schedule means less
NOLA offense vs TXSO defense
Offense 230th of 366 against a defense 323rd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NOLA 20.4%, TXSO 18.5%. Forced: NOLA 14.9%, TXSO 16.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NOLA 49.6 and allows 49.0; TXSO 49.7 and allows 52.5
Free throws
Free throw rate: NOLA 46.4, TXSO 38.2. Allowed: NOLA 39.5, TXSO 44.0
Home court
TXSO at home. This season: TXSO 0-0 at home, NOLA 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NOLA 35.6%, TXSO 28.8%. Defensive: NOLA 65.5%, TXSO 68.8%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: NOLA plays 70.2 a game (110th fastest), TXSO 71.8 (40th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NOLA 22%, TXSO 37%. Transfers in: NOLA 4, TXSO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
NOLA hits 31.8% and allows 32.4%; TXSO hits 33.1% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 33.7% and 32.5% of their shots
Even
TXSO offense vs NOLA defense
Offense 311th of 366 against a defense 316th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NOLA -3.2 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | NOLA 77.2 · TXSO 74 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NOLA -2.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | NOLA 36.4 · TXSO 34.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
LSU N Orleans
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 78-74 | +21.5 | W +25.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 58-93 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 85-63 | +11.5 | W +33.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 79-90 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 76-85 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 78-81 | +23.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 50-82 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 76-85 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 57-99 | +32.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 85-69 | +6.5 | W +22.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 69-83 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-74 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 83-73 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-84 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 89-76 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-82 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 80-62 | +4.5 | W +22.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 94-85 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-95 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-61 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 78-64 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 77-71 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 77-73 | +11.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 63-66 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 78-82 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-74 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TCU
W 78-74
+25.5
10
@
LSU
L 58-93
−15.5
14
@
TULN
W 85-63
+33.5
18
@
PEPP
L 79-90
−5.5
21
@
FRES
L 76-85
−2.5
24
@
MSST
L 78-81
+20.5
26
@
TTU
L 50-82
−2.5
3
@
MEM
L 70-86
−1.5
6
vs
HCU
L 76-85
−13.5
8
vs
UIW
W 84-83
+2.5
13
@
HOU
L 57-99
−9.5
29
@
RGV
W 85-69
+22.5
31
@
AMCC
L 69-83
−9.5
3
@
NWST
L 68-74
−7.5
5
vs
ETAM
W 83-73
+3.5
10
vs
NICH
L 77-90
−9.5
12
@
SELA
W 79-76
+5.5
17
vs
SFA
L 79-84
+1.5
19
vs
LAM
W 89-76
+14.5
24
@
MCN
L 63-82
−0.5
27
@
NICH
W 80-62
+22.5
31
vs
NWST
W 75-64
+6.5
2
@
ETAM
W 94-85
+7.5
7
vs
RGV
L 76-95
−17.5
9
vs
AMCC
W 84-78
+7.5
14
@
HCU
L 60-61
+0.5
16
@
UIW
W 78-64
+16.5
21
@
LAM
W 77-71
+10.5
23
@
SFA
W 77-73
+15.5
28
vs
MCN
L 63-66
+7.5
2
vs
SELA
L 78-82
−10.5
8
vs
HCU
W 73-60
+7.5
9
vs
AMCC
L 61-74
−10.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TCU
W 78-74
+2.5
10
@
LSU
L 58-93
−11.5
14
@
TULN
W 85-63
−5.5
18
@
PEPP
L 79-90
+11.5
21
@
FRES
L 76-85
+6.5
24
@
MSST
L 78-81
−1.5
26
@
TTU
L 50-82
−25.5
3
@
MEM
L 70-86
+6.5
6
vs
HCU
L 76-85
+20.5
8
vs
UIW
W 84-83
+18.5
13
@
HOU
L 57-99
+17.5
29
@
RGV
W 85-69
+1.5
31
@
AMCC
L 69-83
+9.5
3
@
NWST
L 68-74
−7.5
5
vs
ETAM
W 83-73
+5.5
10
vs
NICH
L 77-90
+12.5
12
@
SELA
W 79-76
+12.5
17
vs
SFA
L 79-84
+15.5
19
vs
LAM
W 89-76
+20.5
24
@
MCN
L 63-82
−11.5
27
@
NICH
W 80-62
−15.5
31
vs
NWST
W 75-64
−14.5
2
@
ETAM
W 94-85
+27.5
7
vs
RGV
L 76-95
+19.5
9
vs
AMCC
W 84-78
+15.5
14
@
HCU
L 60-61
−27.5
16
@
UIW
W 78-64
−12.5
21
@
LAM
W 77-71
+1.5
23
@
SFA
W 77-73
−3.5
28
vs
MCN
L 63-66
−21.5
2
vs
SELA
L 78-82
+16.5
8
vs
HCU
W 73-60
−10.5
9
vs
AMCC
L 61-74
−12.5
over 19under 14avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas Southern
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
9-19
32% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 43-98 | +29.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-104 | +29.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-77 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 74-109 | +36.5 | W +1.5 | 164.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-89 | +21.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 72-108 | +34.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 67-84 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-74 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-51 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 89-94 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 96-64 | -2.5 | W +29.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-85 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 62-57 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 74-73 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 83-64 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-72 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 92-87 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-57 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 59-70 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-85 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−25.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
−4.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−5.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+1.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−4.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−14.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
−1.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
−2.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
−4.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
−11.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−9.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
+20.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
−2.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+16.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+29.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
−8.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
+6.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−2.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+1.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
+5.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
+20.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−12.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
−0.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
+18.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−12.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
−9.5
covered 9didn’t cover 19avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−16.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
+12.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
+29.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−0.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+18.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−6.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
+27.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
+4.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
+3.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
+4.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−22.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
−7.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−3.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
+29.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+17.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+4.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
+5.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
−27.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−4.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+21.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
−4.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
−5.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−0.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
+33.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
−13.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−25.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
+16.5
over 14under 14avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
LSU N Orleans has the better starters
Position by position: LSU N Orleans 1, Texas Southern 0, even 4
LSU N OrleansBetterTexas Southern
G K. Singleton TR13.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 50
←NOLASmall
G K. Bilal TR5.6 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 23
G N. Jones TR14.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 65
=No call
G C. Patterson6.4 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
G J. Chretien1.4 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Vungo TR3.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
F E. Boudouma5.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 13
=Even
F A. Andrews2.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 7
F K. Osby4.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 10
=Even
C J. Gorecki2.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
LSU N OrleansBetterTexas Southern
NOLA offense230th of 366 · -7.1
←NOLASmall
TXSO defense323rd of 366 · -8.4
NOLA defense316th of 366 · -8.2
=Even
TXSO offense311th of 366 · -9.7
Backcourt-1.8 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.6 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-4.1 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 2 players
←NOLASmall
Bench-4.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNOLA betterTXSO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Singleton35 min · TRN. Jones32 min · TRJ. Chretien9 minC. OkeyNewY. OrtizNewS. ParsonNew
Forwards
E. Boudouma18 minK. Osby17 minK. Ratliff9 min · TRW. CampbellNewS. OminuNewE. NwakammaNew
Centers
J. Pace5 min · TR
Guards
K. Bilal21 min · TRC. Patterson16 minB. Vungo12 min · TRA. Nedal12 minJ. Hamilton7 minJ. Kimbrough4 min · TR
Forwards
A. Andrews13 minJ. Akpovwa9 minX. Wedlow3 min · TRJ. FarmerNew
Centers
J. Gorecki17 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.5 #178 | Points per game | 73.9 #204 |
| 1.06 #226 | Points per possession | 1.03 #293 |
| 70.2 #110 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #40 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #258 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #251 |
| 31.8 #287 | 3-point % | 33.1 #224 |
| 33.7 #302 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.5 #324 |
| 46.4 #1 | Free throw rate | 38.2 #96 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #353 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #297 |
| 35.6 #34 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #237 |
| 12.9 #214 | Assists per game | 11.1 #332 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.7 #260 | Points allowed | 80.0 #318 |
| 1.11 #238 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #260 |
| 49.0 #71 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #240 |
| 32.4 #86 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #190 |
| 14.9 #301 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #188 |
| 65.5 #325 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.8 #211 |
| 5.8 #258 | Steals per game | 6.6 #167 |
| 3.8 #105 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #173 |
LSU N Orleans
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC61–74
- Wvs Hou Christian73–60
- Lvs SE Louisiana78–82
- Lvs McNeese63–66
- W@ SF Austin77–73
A week or more of rest.
Texas Southern
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alabama A&M74–85
- Lvs Prairie View59–70
- Wvs Jackson St82–57
- Wvs Alcorn St92–87
- L@ Miss Valley St71–72
A week or more of rest.