G.B. Hodge Center · at SC Upstate
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UPST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UPST 78–69 · win probability UPST 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UPST has more of the edges
SCST 2, UPST 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
SCST hits 34.0% and allows 33.5%; UPST hits 31.4% and allows 35.6%. Threes are 33.3% and 35.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: SCST 46.8 and allows 53.9; UPST 48.3 and allows 51.0
UPST offense vs SCST defense
Offense 299th of 366 against a defense 351st, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UPST at home. This season: UPST 0-0 at home, SCST 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SCST 34%, UPST 9%. Transfers in: SCST 1, UPST 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
SCST has played the 317th-hardest schedule, UPST the 281st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SCST 31.4%, UPST 29.2%. Defensive: SCST 62.4%, UPST 68.6%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SCST 20.8%, UPST 18.1%. Forced: SCST 18.8%, UPST 16.5%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SCST 41.0, UPST 32.8. Allowed: SCST 51.9, UPST 36.0
Even
SCST offense vs UPST defense
Offense 341st of 366 against a defense 338th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SCST plays 70.3 a game (102nd fastest), UPST 70.5 (97th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UPST -8.8 | — |
| Total | — | 146.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | SCST 69.1 · UPST 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UPST -5.1 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SCST 31.8 · UPST 36.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SCST 1–3 UPSTUPST leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · SCST 3-0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025-26 | UPST 78 @ SCST 72 | SCST +10.5 | SCST W |
| Dec 18, 2024-25 | SCST 85 @ UPST 70 | UPST +2.5 | SCST W |
| Dec 10, 2022-23 | SCST 84 @ UPST 89 | UPST -6.5 | SCST W |
| Nov 23, 2021-22 | UPST 82 @ SCST 78 | SCST +4 | P |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SC State
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 45-104 | +35.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 72-82 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-85 | +2.5 | L −20.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-88 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 81-82 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 66-98 | +34.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 79-101 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 59-80 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 44-84 | +12.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 78-102 | +18.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 72-78 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 70-95 | +31.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 54-105 | +44.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 58-57 | +8.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 82-89 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 70-64 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 63-54 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-85 | +14.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 57-59 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 85-72 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-90 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 83-90 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-69 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 61-59 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 80-64 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 88-82 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 61-78 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
LOU
L 45-104
−23.5
7
@
SAM
L 72-82
+4.5
10
@
NCAT
L 62-85
−20.5
14
@
COFC
L 61-88
−8.5
19
vs
UTC
L 66-78
−0.5
23
@
SDAK
L 81-82
+14.5
25
@
MIZ
L 66-98
+2.5
29
@
WIN
L 79-101
−1.5
5
@
BCU
L 59-80
−7.5
8
@
CHSO
L 44-84
−27.5
12
@
QUC
L 78-102
−5.5
16
vs
UPST
L 72-78
+4.5
22
@
SC
L 70-95
+6.5
30
@
TENN
L 54-105
−6.5
3
vs
HOW
W 58-57
+9.5
10
@
MORG
L 67-72
−0.5
12
@
COPP
W 74-72
+3.5
17
vs
NORF
L 82-89
−1.5
26
vs
DSU
W 70-64
+4.5
4
vs
UMES
W 63-54
+12.5
7
@
HOW
L 57-85
−13.5
16
vs
COPP
L 57-59
−6.5
18
vs
NCCU
W 85-72
+15.5
21
@
NORF
L 71-90
−8.5
25
vs
MORG
L 83-90
−5.5
28
@
UMES
L 57-69
−6.5
2
@
DSU
W 61-59
+5.5
5
@
NCCU
W 80-64
+23.5
12
vs
NORF
W 88-82
+13.5
13
vs
HOW
L 61-78
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
LOU
L 45-104
−10.5
7
@
SAM
L 72-82
−0.5
10
@
NCAT
L 62-85
−12.5
14
@
COFC
L 61-88
−7.5
19
vs
UTC
L 66-78
−10.5
23
@
SDAK
L 81-82
+2.5
25
@
MIZ
L 66-98
+3.5
29
@
WIN
L 79-101
+22.5
5
@
BCU
L 59-80
−9.5
8
@
CHSO
L 44-84
−28.5
12
@
QUC
L 78-102
+22.5
16
vs
UPST
L 72-78
+2.5
22
@
SC
L 70-95
+15.5
30
@
TENN
L 54-105
+11.5
3
vs
HOW
W 58-57
−29.5
10
@
MORG
L 67-72
−8.5
12
@
COPP
W 74-72
+5.5
17
vs
NORF
L 82-89
+31.5
26
vs
DSU
W 70-64
−1.5
4
vs
UMES
W 63-54
−16.5
7
@
HOW
L 57-85
+0.5
16
vs
COPP
L 57-59
−22.5
18
vs
NCCU
W 85-72
+20.5
21
@
NORF
L 71-90
+20.5
25
vs
MORG
L 83-90
+19.5
28
@
UMES
L 57-69
−6.5
2
@
DSU
W 61-59
−14.5
5
@
NCCU
W 80-64
+3.5
12
vs
NORF
W 88-82
+25.5
13
vs
HOW
L 61-78
−6.5
over 15under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
SC Upstate
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-87 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 5 | @ | W 67-66 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-73 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 84-88 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 82-67 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +25.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 62-80 | +29.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 78-72 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-74 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-76 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-81 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-83 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 65-67 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-76 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-94 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-95 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-68 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-74 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-71 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-61 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 64-65 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+2.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
+10.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
+1.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
−6.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−5.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+7.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
+16.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+4.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
+8.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
+11.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
−4.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−8.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
−7.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−15.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
−3.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
−15.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−11.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
+6.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
−2.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+7.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
−10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
−0.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
+9.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+3.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−4.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−1.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−11.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+9.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
−31.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
−22.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
+21.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−17.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+0.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
−22.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+18.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
−4.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
−9.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
+2.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−13.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
+25.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−36.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
+6.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−21.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
−22.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
+3.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+43.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
+10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
+9.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
−26.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+8.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−22.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−14.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−14.5
over 14under 15avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SC Upstate has the better starters
Position by position: SC State 0, SC Upstate 1, even 4
SC StateBetterSC Upstate
G D. Jackson TR6.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 24
=No call
G C. Rich0 pts · 0 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
G N. Treadwell9.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 25
→UPSTSmall
F M. Webb TR9.9 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 56
F D. Hodge2.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 1
=No call
F D. Tubek TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F C. Parker6.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 53
=No call
F Z. Johnson TR0 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F T. Tindal2.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 12
=Even
C C. Collier1.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 10
SC StateBetterSC Upstate
SCST offense341st of 366 · -11.6
=Even
UPST defense338th of 366 · -8.9
SCST defense351st of 366 · -9.8
=Even
UPST offense299th of 366 · -9.2
Backcourt-3.7 · 2 players
→UPSTBig
Backcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→UPSTSmall
Frontcourt-2.0 · 4 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSCST betterUPST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Jackson23 min · TRN. Treadwell23 minB. JacksonNewM. TaylorNewB. HarrisNewC. BarnesNew
Forwards
D. Hodge18 minC. Parker18 minT. Tindal10 minJ. PrettyNewB. AdamsNewA. NGomabieNew
Guards
C. Rich5 minA. Allen-JohnsonNewW. TessemaNewR. NaugleNewJ. PattersonNewN. MvulaNew
Forwards
M. Webb27 min · TRD. Tubek7 min · TRZ. Johnson2 min · TRK. PayneNewD. EdmondNewA. PerottiNew
Centers
C. Collier14 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.4 #325 | Points per game | 71.0 #265 |
| 0.96 #353 | Points per possession | 1.00 #324 |
| 70.3 #102 | Pace (possessions) | 70.5 #97 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.8 #341 | Effective FG% | 48.3 #307 |
| 34.0 #173 | 3-point % | 31.4 #308 |
| 33.3 #312 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.6 #256 |
| 41.0 #47 | Free throw rate | 32.8 #239 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.8 #355 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #274 |
| 31.4 #146 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #231 |
| 12.1 #281 | Assists per game | 11.7 #304 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.6 #327 | Points allowed | 75.7 #210 |
| 1.15 #318 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #170 |
| 53.9 #296 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #156 |
| 33.5 #155 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.6 #289 |
| 18.8 #59 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #185 |
| 62.4 #362 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.6 #224 |
| 6.9 #137 | Steals per game | 6.1 #220 |
| 3.8 #98 | Blocks per game | 4.7 #24 |
SC State
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-8 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Howard61–78
- Wvs Norfolk St88–82
- W@ NC Central80–64
- W@ Delaware St61–59
- L@ MD Eastern57–69
A week or more of rest.
SC Upstate
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gardner-Webb64–65
- Wvs Gardner-Webb71–61
- L@ Radford59–71
- Wvs Presbyterian76–74
- L@ Winthrop64–68
A week or more of rest.