James T. Morris Arena · at IU Indy · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IUIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects RMU 81–74 · win probability RMU 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: RMU has more of the edges
RMU 5, IUIN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RMU 37.5%, IUIN 28.7%. Defensive: RMU 71.2%, IUIN 64.5%
Three-pointers
RMU hits 38.0% and allows 33.2%; IUIN hits 32.4% and allows 38.5%. Threes are 40.7% and 42.1% of their shots
RMU offense vs IUIN defense
Offense 179th of 366 against a defense 364th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RMU 18.6%, IUIN 15.8%. Forced: RMU 15.8%, IUIN 19.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: RMU 54.9 and allows 50.0; IUIN 52.2 and allows 58.2
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: RMU plays 67.5 a game (256th fastest), IUIN 75.3 (4th). Faster games mean more points
IUIN offense vs RMU defense
Offense 249th of 366 against a defense 183rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
IUIN at home. This season: IUIN 0-0 at home, RMU 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: RMU 28.0, IUIN 21.7. Allowed: RMU 40.1, IUIN 46.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RMU 32%, IUIN 14%. Transfers in: RMU 4, IUIN 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
RMU has played the 279th-hardest schedule, IUIN the 284th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | RMU -7.6 | — |
| Total | — | 155.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | RMU 81.4 · IUIN 73.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | RMU -4.6 | — |
| 1H total | 72.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | RMU 38.6 · IUIN 34 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 1-9 10% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
RMU 8–3 IUINRMU leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · RMU 6-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2025-26 | IUIN 58 @ RMU 74 | RMU -8.5 | RMU W |
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | RMU 93 @ IUIN 96 | IUIN +5.5 | IUIN W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | RMU 82 @ IUIN 68 | IUIN +7.5 | RMU W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | IUIN 53 @ RMU 106 | RMU -8.5 | RMU W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | RMU 80 @ IUIN 63 | IUIN +5.5 | RMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Robert Morris
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 69-101 | +22.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 81-79 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 61-75 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-74 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 61-54 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-62 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-74 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-70 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 79-70 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 73-96 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 74-79 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 93-96 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-89 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-76 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-71 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-58 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-66 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-66 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 85-68 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 93-69 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 81-68 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-62 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-64 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 68-53 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
−9.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+9.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−2.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
+1.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+15.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−1.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
+6.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+0.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
+2.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
+6.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+0.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
−4.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
−0.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+4.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
−21.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
−9.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
−8.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+10.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+7.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−10.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
+7.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
−9.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
+7.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
+9.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
+13.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+22.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+17.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
+2.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
+6.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
+11.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
+33.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+8.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−10.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
−7.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+10.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−37.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
−0.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+17.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
−7.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
−9.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+16.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
+3.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
+6.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+13.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
+7.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
+6.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
+28.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+27.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+11.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−4.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
−30.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
+8.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
−9.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
−5.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
−1.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+5.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+2.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
−15.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
−10.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
−22.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−12.5
over 16under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
IU Indy
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 102-118 | +33.5 | W +17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 90-94 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 185.5 | U 184 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 80-112 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 90-83 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 186.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 91-103 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 188.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 80-101 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 181.5 | U 181 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 85-98 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 85-80 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-92 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 180.5 | U 170 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 55-78 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 78-91 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 169.5 | U 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 86-99 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 72-81 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 176.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 59-75 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 96-93 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-80 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 103-85 | +14.5 | W +32.5 | 176.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-74 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 76-85 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-74 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 169.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 88-92 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 81-84 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-83 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 73-85 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 74-86 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 81-87 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 93-101 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 169.5 | O 194 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+17.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−8.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−11.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
+11.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
−13.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−23.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
−9.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
+1.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−16.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−13.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
+10.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
−11.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
+4.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
+4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−9.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
−3.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+8.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−4.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+32.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−7.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+1.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
+5.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
−1.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+2.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+2.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−0.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−6.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
−4.5
2
@
CLE
L 93-101
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+47.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−1.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−0.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
−13.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
+5.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−0.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
+7.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
−16.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−38.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−5.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
−0.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
+12.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
−23.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
−4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−22.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
+12.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+28.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−12.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+11.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−30.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+7.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
−13.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
+21.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+0.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+1.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−2.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−9.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
+4.5
2
@
CLE
L 93-101
+24.5
over 13under 17avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Robert Morris has the better starters
Position by position: Robert Morris 3, IU Indy 1, even 1
Robert MorrisBetterIU Indy
G A. Valentine TR12 pts · 4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 71
←RMUBig
G B. Smith TR8.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 18
G D. Livingston9.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
→IUINBig
G G. Etchison TR9 pts · 1.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 93
G T. Smith6.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
=Even
G J. Clarke TR3.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 34
F J. Dunkley TR12.4 pts · 6.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
←RMUBig
F K. Tinsley7.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
F K. Ugwuakazi TR5.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 63
←RMUBig
F R. Hagy2.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 2
Robert MorrisBetterIU Indy
RMU offense179th of 366 · -5.5
←RMUBig
IUIN defense364th of 366 · -12.3
RMU defense183rd of 366 · -4.2
←RMUSmall
IUIN offense249th of 366 · -7.5
Backcourt-2.8 · 3 players
→IUINSmall
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.5 · 2 players
←RMUBig
Frontcourt-3.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.3 · 3 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestRMU betterIUIN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Valentine33 min · TRD. Livingston26 minT. Smith19 minK. Garris16 min · TRE. Cooke9 minL. SloaneNew
Forwards
J. Dunkley29 min · TRK. Ugwuakazi19 min · TRS. Obenjo9 minD. StolbetskiyNewB. OderinloNew
Guards
B. Smith24 min · TRG. Etchison14 min · TRJ. Clarke13 min · TRM. Pastorcic-StraunNewP. HeissNewT. DrexlerNew
Forwards
K. Tinsley18 minR. Hagy11 minP. IdiaruNewA. ArnettNewM. StackhouseNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #122 | Points per game | 80.9 #49 |
| 1.14 #67 | Points per possession | 1.07 #200 |
| 67.5 #256 | Pace (possessions) | 75.3 #4 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.9 #39 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #136 |
| 38.0 #18 | 3-point % | 32.4 #258 |
| 40.7 #154 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.1 #134 |
| 28.0 #343 | Free throw rate | 21.7 #365 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.6 #305 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #127 |
| 37.5 #11 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.7 #243 |
| 17.6 #13 | Assists per game | 18.9 #3 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.4 #139 | Points allowed | 89.2 #364 |
| 1.08 #174 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #353 |
| 50.0 #100 | Opponent effective FG% | 58.2 #362 |
| 33.2 #135 | Opponent 3-point % | 38.5 #361 |
| 15.8 #230 | Turnovers forced | 19.2 #41 |
| 71.2 #98 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.5 #348 |
| 5.5 #292 | Steals per game | 8.0 #39 |
| 2.5 #308 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #243 |
Robert Morris
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Detroit Mercy64–70
- Wvs Youngstown St68–53
- Wvs Cleveland St83–64
- Wvs Detroit Mercy73–62
- W@ Wright St81–68
A week or more of rest.
IU Indy
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 3-18 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Cleveland St93–101
- Lvs Purdue FW81–87
- Lvs Oakland74–86
- L@ Wright St73–85
- L@ Purdue FW78–83
A week or more of rest.