Bogota Savings Bank Center · at FDU
#272BINGBinghamton
@
#356FDUFDU
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Binghamton and FDU
BINGThis seasonFDU
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects FDU 71–71 · win probability FDU 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: BING has more of the edges

BING 6, FDU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FDUBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BING 20.9%, FDU 32.0%. Defensive: BING 70.6%, FDU 72.7%
BINGBig
Free throws
Free throw rate: BING 41.5, FDU 32.8. Allowed: BING 34.6, FDU 36.3
BINGSmall
FDU offense vs BING defense
Offense 356th of 366 against a defense 273rd, on the model’s ratings
FDUSmall
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BING 18.7%, FDU 18.2%. Forced: BING 13.3%, FDU 16.1%
BINGSmall
Three-pointers
BING hits 32.5% and allows 35.8%; FDU hits 30.3% and allows 37.8%. Threes are 30.9% and 45.2% of their shots
BINGSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BING 65%, FDU 27%. Transfers in: BING 4, FDU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
BINGSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: BING 50.0 and allows 54.3; FDU 47.1 and allows 55.2
FDUSmall
Home court
FDU at home. This season: FDU 0-0 at home, BING 0-0 away
BINGSmall
BING offense vs FDU defense
Offense 274th of 366 against a defense 320th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BING has played the 350th-hardest schedule, FDU the 308th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: BING plays 66.5 a game (294th fastest), FDU 64.4 (356th). Faster games mean more points

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—BING -0.0—
Total—142.5—
Projected score—BING 71.3 · FDU 71.2

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadBING -0.1—
1H total66.7—
1H projected scoreBING 33.4 · FDU 33.3—

Binghamton has the better starters

Position by position: Binghamton 2, FDU 0, even 3
BinghamtonBetterFDU
G J. Quigley14.6 pts · 4.9 reb · 6.3 ast Score 68
BINGBig
G D. Jevtic6.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast Score 25
G K. Robinson TR10.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast Score 40
BINGSmall
G R. Johnson4.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 10
G J. Kelsey0 pts · 1 reb · 2 ast Not ranked
No call
G R. Elijah Godbolt1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.9 ast Score 1
F S. Snagg3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.3 ast Score 4
Even
F P. Stosic TR3.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 16
C D. Lilley14.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 0.7 ast Score 51
No call
F B. Agu TR2.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.2 ast Not ranked
BinghamtonBetterFDU
BING offense274th of 366 · -8.3
Even
FDU defense320th of 366 · -8.3
BING defense273rd of 366 · -6.9
BINGSmall
FDU offense356th of 366 · -13.3
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
BINGBig
Backcourt-5.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Even
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
FDUSmall
Bench-1.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestBING betterFDU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Binghamton
Guards
J. Quigley37 minK. Robinson26 min · TRJ. Kelsey21 minJ. Blackburn16 minB. Montgomery4 min · TRN. Ibroci3 min
Forwards
S. Snagg20 minD. Godfrey9 min · TRS. SenghoreNew
Centers
D. Lilley33 minJ. Karram4 min · TR
FDU
Guards
D. Jevtic21 minR. Johnson17 minR. Elijah Godbolt12 minT. McQuaid2 minJ. JacobsNewA. CandaNew
Forwards
P. Stosic16 min · TRB. Agu10 min · TRT. Torain9 min · TRA. RatliffNew
Centers
S. Haubro3 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
BINGFDU
Scoring
66.8 #338Points per game65.1 #349
1.00 #328Points per possession1.01 #314
66.5 #294Pace (possessions)64.4 #356
Shooting
50.0 #235Effective FG%47.1 #333
32.5 #2543-point %30.3 #339
30.9 #3403-point attempt rate45.2 #63
41.5 #37Free throw rate32.8 #240
Possessions
18.7 #308Turnover rate18.2 #280
20.9 #361Offensive rebound rate32.0 #125
11.1 #331Assists per game11.4 #316
Defense
76.6 #233Points allowed72.7 #123
1.16 #333Points allowed per possession1.13 #280
54.3 #309Opponent effective FG%55.2 #336
35.8 #294Opponent 3-point %37.8 #354
13.3 #349Turnovers forced16.1 #218
70.6 #128Defensive rebound rate72.7 #46
5.0 #333Steals per game4.8 #344
2.8 #256Blocks per game1.5 #362

Binghamton

5-23 in 2025-26 overall · 4-12 in conference · America East Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Wvs Maine74–67
  • Wvs New Hampshire65–63
  • L@ UMass Lowell79–92
  • W@ Bryant79–67
  • Lvs UAlbany74–77

A week or more of rest.

FDU

8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ Mercyhurst61–70
  • L@ Long Island60–74
  • L@ Le Moyne59–76
  • Lvs New Haven77–84
  • W@ Chicago St60–59

A week or more of rest.