Freedom Hall (TN) · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
RAD -2.5✓ PRES covered by 8.5
Closing total146.5Over by 29.5
| This season | RAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 11-17 | Record | 13-15 |
| 15-13 | ATS | 14-14 |
| 15-13 | O/U | 16-12 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PRES 73–75 RAD · ✗ RAD (54%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRES | 28 | 49 | 14 | 91 |
| RAD | 36 | 41 | 8 | 85 |
1st half: PRES 28, RAD 36 (RAD by 8). The model had RAD by 0.6 and a total of 69.2 (actual 64).
Team stats
| PRES | RAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 35-68 51% | Field goals | 28-72 39% |
| 8-19 42% | 3-pointers | 7-29 24% |
| 13-16 81% | Free throws | 22-36 61% |
| 42 10 off | Rebounds | 42 21 off |
| 20 | Assists | 9 |
| 5 | Steals | 12 |
| 5 | Blocks | 2 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 23 | Fouls | 14 |
| 52 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| PRES | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Parrish G | 45 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 7-16 | 5-9 |
| Jaylen Peterson F | 41 | 20 | 13 | 2 | 8-13 | 0-0 |
| Triston Wilson G | 36 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 2-11 | 1-5 |
| Jonah Pierce F | 31 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-0 |
| Josh Pickett G | 24 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chidi Chiakwelu F | 27 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 8-8 | 0-0 |
| JD Bowden G | 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Iverson King G | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Khalon Hudson G | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Augustine Ayelyine, Amare Anderson, Erik Taylor, Luke Allison
| RAD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylon Johnson G | 39 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-10 |
| Del Jones G | 38 | 22 | 2 | 6 | 7-17 | 1-5 |
| Tyson Brown F | 35 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Lukas Walls G | 34 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 6-9 | 2-4 |
| Dennis Parker Jr. G | 29 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 3-16 | 0-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mari Jordan G | 18 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-1 |
| Brennan Rigsby Jr. G | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Frederik Erichsen F | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Louie Jordan F | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Warren Keel Jr., Diogo Alves, Gabriel Ferreira, Bradley Land, Zion Walker
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketRAD -2.5
ModelRAD -1.2
Model edgePRES +1.3
W PRES covered
Total
Market146.5
Model147.9
Model edgeOver 1.4
W Over
Projected score
PRES 73.3 · RAD 74.5
PRES 91 · RAD 85
Win probability
RAD 54%
1st half
Spread
RAD -0.6
RAD -8.0
Total
69.2
64 points
Projected score
PRES 34.3 · RAD 34.9
PRES 28 · RAD 36
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRAD -2.5
no move
CloseRAD -2.5
No change since the open
Total
Open145.5
▲ 1
Close146.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
PRES +120 · RAD -142
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RAD -2.5 · unchangedmodel RAD -1
model RAD -1
Opened 145.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 upmodel 148
model 148
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
PRES 3–7 RADRAD leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · RAD has won the last 3 meetings · PRES 3-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025-26 | RAD 93 @ PRES 84 | PRES -1.5 | RAD W |
| Jan 7, 2025-26 | PRES 61 @ RAD 80 | RAD -6.5 | RAD W |
| Mar 7, 2024-25 | PRES 69 vs RAD 74 | RAD -4.5 | RAD W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | PRES 80 @ RAD 73 | RAD -6.5 | PRES W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | RAD 82 @ PRES 69 | PRES +2.5 | RAD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Presbyterian
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 55-76 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 63-61 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-81 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 62-64 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-67 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-86 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 69-41 | -8.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 56-63 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-74 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-87 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-80 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-70 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-55 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-83 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-93 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 67-84 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-79 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-74 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−17.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
+10.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
+5.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
−3.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
+4.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
+0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
−14.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
+19.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−2.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+0.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−16.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
−8.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−12.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
−3.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+3.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+28.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+5.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+11.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
−10.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−11.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
−15.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
+6.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
+4.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
−3.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+6.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
+3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−10.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
−9.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
−17.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
+4.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
−24.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
−0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
+0.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
−23.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−19.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+17.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−4.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
+29.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+25.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−6.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
+7.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+2.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+1.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+22.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
+7.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+15.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
+25.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−15.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
+4.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
−22.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
−2.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
+8.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+0.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
−6.5
over 15under 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Radford
28 games played
Straight up
13-15
46% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-75 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 74-89 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 59-92 | -6.5 | L −39.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 82-87 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 58-87 | +10.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 73-81 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 72-89 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 75-82 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 89-56 | -13.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 107-77 | -20.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-96 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 97-90 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 76-69 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 80-61 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-91 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-80 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-83 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 75-76 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 83-93 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 84-75 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 93-84 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 78-80 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-86 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-80 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 82-70 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 73-74 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 71-59 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 74-90 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
−11.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+5.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−39.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
−13.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−18.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
−3.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
+6.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
−10.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
+19.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+9.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
−4.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
−4.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
+8.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
+12.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
−23.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
−4.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
−2.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
+8.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
−2.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
+7.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+10.5
4
vs
WIN
L 78-80
+2.5
7
@
HPU
L 77-86
+5.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 90-80
+5.5
19
vs
GWEB
W 82-70
−6.5
21
@
UNCA
L 73-74
+1.5
26
vs
UPST
W 71-59
+4.5
28
@
LONG
L 74-90
−14.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
+3.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+0.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−5.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
+6.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−8.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
+2.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
−4.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
+4.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
−9.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+29.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
+8.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
+28.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
−13.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
−6.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
+11.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
+3.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
+10.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
−14.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
+10.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
−3.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+25.5
4
vs
WIN
L 78-80
−3.5
7
@
HPU
L 77-86
+0.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 90-80
+8.5
19
vs
GWEB
W 82-70
−10.5
21
@
UNCA
L 73-74
−2.5
26
vs
UPST
W 71-59
−22.5
28
@
LONG
L 74-90
+9.5
over 16under 12avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Presbyterian
11-17 overall · 7-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Winthrop70–74
- Lvs High Point73–79
- L@ SC Upstate74–76
- Wvs Longwood72–65
- W@ UNC Asheville58–57
6 days since their last game.
Radford
13-15 overall · 9-7 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Longwood74–90
- Wvs SC Upstate71–59
- L@ UNC Asheville73–74
- Wvs Gardner-Webb82–70
- Wvs Charleston So90–80
6 days since their last game.