Simon Skjodt Assembly Hall · at Indiana · Conference game
Closing line
PUR -4.5✓ IU covered by 9.5
Closing total150.5Under by 11.5
| This season | IU | |
|---|---|---|
| 17-3 | Record | 13-7 |
| 9-11 | ATS | 10-10 |
| 8-12 | O/U | 9-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PUR 79–73 IU · ✗ PUR (70%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUR | 29 | 38 | 67 |
| IU | 40 | 32 | 72 |
1st half: PUR 29, IU 40 (IU by 11). The model had PUR by 3.8 and a total of 71.2 (actual 69).
Team stats
| PUR | IU | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-54 48% | Field goals | 23-50 46% |
| 7-20 35% | 3-pointers | 12-33 36% |
| 8-15 53% | Free throws | 14-19 74% |
| 33 9 off | Rebounds | 28 6 off |
| 13 | Assists | 16 |
| 5 | Steals | 8 |
| 2 | Blocks | 1 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 16 | Fouls | 15 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 18 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith G | 39 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 6-14 | 2-8 |
| Fletcher Loyer G | 32 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn F | 29 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 9-14 | 0-0 |
| C.J. Cox G | 28 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3-4 | 2-3 |
| Oscar Cluff C | 19 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jack Benter G | 18 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Gicarri Harris G | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Jacobsen C | 13 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Omer Mayer G | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Raleigh Burgess, Jack Lusk, Aaron Fine, Jace Rayl, Antione West Jr, Liam Murphy, Sam King
| IU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conor Enright G | 40 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Lamar Wilkerson G | 36 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 7-18 | 2-9 |
| Tucker DeVries F | 34 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 3-7 | 3-7 |
| Nick Dorn G | 32 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 6-11 | 4-9 |
| Sam Alexis F | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Reed Bailey F | 26 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Jasai Miles G | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Trent Sisley F | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Drew Snively, Tryce Grensing, Andrej Acimovic, Aleksa Ristic, Josh Harris, Tayton Conerway, Deuce Drake, Ian Stephens, Jordan Rayford
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketPUR -4.5
ModelPUR -6.1
Model edgePUR +1.6
L IU covered
Total
Market150.5
Model152.1
Model edgeOver 1.6
L Under
Projected score
PUR 79.1 · IU 73
PUR 67 · IU 72
Win probability
PUR 70%
1st half
Spread
PUR -3.8
IU -11.0
Total
71.2
69 points
Projected score
PUR 37.5 · IU 33.7
PUR 29 · IU 40
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenPUR -4.5
no move
ClosePUR -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open151.5
▼ 1
Close150.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
PUR -218 · IU +180
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened PUR -4.5 · unchangedmodel PUR -6
model PUR -6
Opened 151.5 · closed 150.5 · moved 1 downmodel 152
model 152
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
PUR 4–4 IUSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · PUR 2-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2024-25 | PUR 58 @ IU 73 | IU +3.5 | IU W |
| Jan 31, 2024-25 | IU 76 @ PUR 81 | PUR -12.5 | IU W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | IU 59 @ PUR 79 | PUR -17.5 | PUR W |
| Jan 16, 2023-24 | PUR 87 @ IU 66 | IU +9.5 | PUR W |
| Feb 25, 2022-23 | IU 79 @ PUR 71 | PUR -6.5 | IU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Purdue
20 games played
Straight up
17-3
85% wins
Against the spread
9-11
45% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-12
40% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 82-51 | -33.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-77 | -31.5 | L −21.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 87-80 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 97-79 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-56 | -3.5 | W +26.5 | 153.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 109-62 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 81-65 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 58-81 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-57 | -19.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-59 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 101-60 | -24.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-73 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-73 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 93-85 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 79-72 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-64 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 67-69 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EVAN
W 82-51
−2.5
7
vs
OAK
W 87-77
−21.5
13
@
ALA
W 87-80
+10.5
16
vs
AKR
W 97-79
−0.5
20
vs
MEM
W 80-71
−5.5
21
vs
TTU
W 86-56
+26.5
28
vs
EIU
W 109-62
+6.5
2
@
RUTG
W 81-65
+2.5
6
vs
ISU
L 58-81
−27.5
10
vs
MINN
W 85-57
+8.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 79-59
+3.5
20
vs
AUB
W 88-60
+20.5
29
vs
KENT
W 101-60
+16.5
3
@
WIS
W 89-73
+10.5
7
vs
WASH
W 81-73
−8.5
10
vs
PSU
W 93-85
−14.5
14
vs
IOWA
W 79-72
−3.5
17
@
USC
W 69-64
−4.5
20
@
UCLA
L 67-69
−7.5
24
vs
ILL
L 82-88
−11.5
covered 9didn’t cover 11avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EVAN
W 82-51
−17.5
7
vs
OAK
W 87-77
+5.5
13
@
ALA
W 87-80
−5.5
16
vs
AKR
W 97-79
+12.5
20
vs
MEM
W 80-71
−5.5
21
vs
TTU
W 86-56
−11.5
28
vs
EIU
W 109-62
+29.5
2
@
RUTG
W 81-65
−0.5
6
vs
ISU
L 58-81
−15.5
10
vs
MINN
W 85-57
−1.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 79-59
−16.5
20
vs
AUB
W 88-60
−4.5
29
vs
KENT
W 101-60
+5.5
3
@
WIS
W 89-73
+8.5
7
vs
WASH
W 81-73
−0.5
10
vs
PSU
W 93-85
+25.5
14
vs
IOWA
W 79-72
+5.5
17
@
USC
W 69-64
−22.5
20
@
UCLA
L 67-69
−11.5
24
vs
ILL
L 82-88
+17.5
over 8under 12avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Indiana
20 games played
Straight up
13-7
65% wins
Against the spread
10-10
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-11
45% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 98-51 | -30.5 | W +16.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 100-77 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 101-70 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 69-61 | -28.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 73-53 | -32.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 86-69 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 100-56 | -29.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 64-73 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-87 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 113-72 | -14.5 | W +26.5 | 152.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-72 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 78-58 | -38.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 81-60 | -21.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 90-80 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 84-66 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-83 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 60-81 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-74 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 72-86 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
AAMU
W 98-51
+16.5
9
vs
MARQ
W 100-77
+19.5
12
vs
MILW
W 101-70
+6.5
16
vs
UIW
W 69-61
−20.5
20
vs
LIN
W 73-53
−12.5
25
vs
KSU
W 86-69
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 100-56
+14.5
3
@
MINN
L 64-73
−16.5
6
vs
LOU
L 78-87
−5.5
9
vs
PSU
W 113-72
+26.5
13
@
UK
L 60-72
−8.5
20
vs
CHST
W 78-58
−18.5
22
vs
SIE
W 81-60
−0.5
4
vs
WASH
W 90-80
+0.5
7
@
MD
W 84-66
+10.5
10
vs
NEB
L 77-83
−10.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-81
−14.5
17
vs
IOWA
L 57-74
−20.5
20
@
MICH
L 72-86
+1.5
23
@
RUTG
W 82-59
+15.5
covered 10didn’t cover 10avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
AAMU
W 98-51
+1.5
9
vs
MARQ
W 100-77
+20.5
12
vs
MILW
W 101-70
+5.5
16
vs
UIW
W 69-61
−27.5
20
vs
LIN
W 73-53
−29.5
25
vs
KSU
W 86-69
−9.5
29
vs
BCU
W 100-56
+7.5
3
@
MINN
L 64-73
−7.5
6
vs
LOU
L 78-87
+2.5
9
vs
PSU
W 113-72
+32.5
13
@
UK
L 60-72
−24.5
20
vs
CHST
W 78-58
−16.5
22
vs
SIE
W 81-60
−4.5
4
vs
WASH
W 90-80
+17.5
7
@
MD
W 84-66
+2.5
10
vs
NEB
L 77-83
+9.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-81
−4.5
17
vs
IOWA
L 57-74
−15.5
20
@
MICH
L 72-86
−5.5
23
@
RUTG
W 82-59
−6.5
over 9under 11avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Purdue
17-3 overall · 7-2 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois82–88
- L@ UCLA67–69
- W@ USC69–64
- Wvs Iowa79–72
- Wvs Penn State93–85
3 days since their last game.
Indiana
13-7 overall · 4-5 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Rutgers82–59
- L@ Michigan72–86
- Lvs Iowa57–74
- L@ Michigan St60–81
- Lvs Nebraska77–83
4 days since their last game.