Cassell Coliseum · at Virginia Tech · Conference game
Closing line
DUKE -13.5✓ DUKE covered by 0.5
Closing total148.5Under by 18.5
| This season | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| 19-1 | Record | 16-6 |
| 12-8 | ATS | 13-9 |
| 7-13 | O/U | 11-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: DUKE 84–69 VT · ✓ DUKE (90%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUKE | 40 | 32 | 72 |
| VT | 31 | 27 | 58 |
1st half: DUKE 40, VT 31 (DUKE by 9). The model had DUKE by 8.9 and a total of 71.2 (actual 71).
Team stats
| DUKE | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| 31-59 53% | Field goals | 23-55 42% |
| 5-21 24% | 3-pointers | 7-26 27% |
| 5-7 71% | Free throws | 5-6 83% |
| 33 12 off | Rebounds | 26 11 off |
| 15 | Assists | 11 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 13 | Fouls | 12 |
| 46 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| DUKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Boozer F | 37 | 24 | 8 | 5 | 9-12 | 2-3 |
| Nik Khamenia F | 30 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Cayden Boozer G | 28 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Patrick Ngongba II C | 24 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Isaiah Evans G | 23 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Caleb Foster G | 26 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Maliq Brown F | 19 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-4 |
| Dame Sarr F | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Darren Harris G | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Sebastian Wilkins, Ifeanyi Ufochukwu, Cameron Sheffield, Jack Scott
| VT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Hammond G | 40 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 |
| Amani Hansberry F | 37 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 8-13 | 4-5 |
| Jailen Bedford G | 33 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-5 |
| Tobi Lawal F | 31 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Neo Avdalas G | 29 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1-8 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jaden Schutt G | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Christian Gurdak C | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Antonio Dorn C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tyler Johnson, Izaiah Pasha, Sin'Cere Jones, Brett Freeman, Shamarius Peterkin, Solomon Davis
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDUKE -10.5
3 → DUKE
CloseDUKE -13.5
3 pts toward DUKE
Total
Open146.5
▲ 2
Close148.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
DUKE -1050 · VT +675
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DUKE -10.5 · closed DUKE -13.5 · moved 3 toward DUKEmodel DUKE -14.5
model DUKE -14.5
Opened 146.5 · closed 148.5 · moved 2 upmodel 152
model 152
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | DUKE -13.5 | DUKE -14.7 | DUKE +1.2 | W DUKE covered |
| Total | 148.5 | 152.2 | Over 3.7 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | DUKE 83.5 · VT 68.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DUKE -8.9 | DUKE -9.0 |
| 1H total | 71.2 | 71 |
| 1H projected score | DUKE 40.1 · VT 31.2 | DUKE 40 · VT 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
DUKE 4–2 VTDUKE leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · DUKE has won the last 3 meetings · DUKE 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024-25 | VT 65 @ DUKE 88 | DUKE -24.5 | VT W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | DUKE 77 @ VT 67 | VT +3.5 | DUKE W |
| Feb 25, 2022-23 | VT 65 @ DUKE 81 | DUKE -6.5 | DUKE W |
| Jan 23, 2022-23 | DUKE 75 @ VT 78 | VT -1.5 | VT W |
| Mar 12, 2021-22 | VT 82 vs DUKE 67 | DUKE -6 | VT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Duke
20 games played
Straight up
19-1
95% wins
Against the spread
12-8
60% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-13
35% overs · avg −3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 75-60 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-54 | -36.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 114-59 | -33.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 100-62 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 78-66 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 100-42 | -39.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 93-56 | -43.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 67-66 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 66-60 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 97-73 | -32.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 81-82 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 85-79 | -27.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 91-87 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 84-73 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-75 | -15.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 71-56 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-50 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 90-69 | -19.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 83-52 | -8.5 | W +22.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
TEX
W 75-60
+4.5
8
vs
WCU
W 95-54
+4.5
11
@
ARMY
W 114-59
+21.5
14
vs
INST
W 100-62
+0.5
18
vs
KU
W 78-66
+1.5
21
vs
NIA
W 100-42
+18.5
23
vs
HOW
W 93-56
−6.5
27
vs
ARK
W 80-71
−3.5
2
vs
FLA
W 67-66
−8.5
6
@
MSU
W 66-60
+4.5
16
vs
LIP
W 97-73
−8.5
20
vs
TTU
L 81-82
−10.5
31
vs
GT
W 85-79
−21.5
3
@
FSU
W 91-87
−12.5
6
@
LOU
W 84-73
+9.5
10
vs
SMU
W 82-75
−8.5
14
@
CAL
W 71-56
+0.5
17
@
STAN
W 80-50
+18.5
24
vs
WAKE
W 90-69
+1.5
26
vs
LOU
W 83-52
+22.5
covered 12didn’t cover 8avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
TEX
W 75-60
−18.5
8
vs
WCU
W 95-54
−3.5
11
@
ARMY
W 114-59
+20.5
14
vs
INST
W 100-62
−1.5
18
vs
KU
W 78-66
−5.5
21
vs
NIA
W 100-42
−4.5
23
vs
HOW
W 93-56
−5.5
27
vs
ARK
W 80-71
−8.5
2
vs
FLA
W 67-66
−24.5
6
@
MSU
W 66-60
−15.5
16
vs
LIP
W 97-73
+18.5
20
vs
TTU
L 81-82
+10.5
31
vs
GT
W 85-79
+10.5
3
@
FSU
W 91-87
+14.5
6
@
LOU
W 84-73
−4.5
10
vs
SMU
W 82-75
+1.5
14
@
CAL
W 71-56
−22.5
17
@
STAN
W 80-50
−18.5
24
vs
WAKE
W 90-69
+5.5
26
vs
LOU
W 83-52
−22.5
over 7under 13avg −3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia Tech
22 games played
Straight up
16-6
73% wins
Against the spread
13-9
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-11
50% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 9avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
over 11under 11avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Duke
19-1 overall · 8-0 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Louisville83–52
- Wvs Wake Forest90–69
- W@ Stanford80–50
- W@ California71–56
- Wvs SMU82–75
5 days since their last game.
Virginia Tech
16-6 overall · 5-4 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Georgia Tech71–65
- L@ Louisville71–85
- W@ Syracuse76–74
- Wvs Notre Dame89–76
- L@ SMU76–77
4 days since their last game.