OU Credit Union O'rena · at Oakland · Conference game
Closing line
OAK -5.5✓ OAK covered by 5.5
Closing total159.5Under by 8.5
| This season | OAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-18 | Record | 13-14 |
| 10-18 | ATS | 15-12 |
| 14-14 | O/U | 17-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MILW 78–85 OAK · ✓ OAK (73%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILW | 34 | 36 | 70 |
| OAK | 41 | 40 | 81 |
1st half: MILW 34, OAK 41 (OAK by 7). The model had OAK by 4.0 and a total of 76.2 (actual 75).
Team stats
| MILW | OAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-64 42% | Field goals | 29-56 52% |
| 9-29 31% | 3-pointers | 10-20 50% |
| 7-9 78% | Free throws | 13-20 65% |
| 42 18 off | Rebounds | 30 9 off |
| 19 | Assists | 19 |
| 6 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 5 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 18 |
Players
| MILW | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler Jackson F | 37 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 10-16 | 2-6 |
| Stevie Elam G | 37 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 4-9 | 3-8 |
| Esyah Pippa-White G | 34 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 1-8 | 1-6 |
| Aaron Franklin G | 30 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Amar Augillard G | 16 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4-10 | 3-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Sekou Konneh F | 27 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 6-10 | 0-0 |
| Josh Dixon G | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Isaiah Dorceus G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Simeon Murchison F | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Austin Villarreal, Ned Renfree, Seth Hubbard, Tate Mackenzie, John Lovelace Jr., Faizon Fields, Danilo Jovanovich
| OAK | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Robinson G | 35 | 20 | 0 | 9 | 6-10 | 4-8 |
| Tuburu Naivalurua F | 34 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 9-13 | 1-1 |
| Brett White II G | 32 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Isaac Garrett F | 21 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Michael Houge F | 18 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ziare Wells G | 29 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 5-6 | 3-3 |
| Warren Marshall IV G | 20 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-2 |
| Khoi Thurmon G | 11 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Nassim Mashhour, Nate Deer, Hamoudy Mashhour, Donny Yeager, William Kassi, MJ Yeager
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenOAK -7.5
2 → MILW
CloseOAK -5.5
2 pts toward MILW
Total
Open160.5
▼ 1
Close159.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
MILW +220 · OAK -270
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened OAK -7.5 · closed OAK -5.5 · moved 2 toward MILWmodel OAK -7
model OAK -7
Opened 160.5 · closed 159.5 · moved 1 downmodel 163
model 163
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | OAK -5.5 | OAK -6.9 | OAK +1.4 | W OAK covered |
| Total | 159.5 | 163.1 | Over 3.6 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | MILW 78.1 · OAK 85 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OAK -4.0 | OAK -7.0 |
| 1H total | 76.2 | 75 |
| 1H projected score | MILW 36.1 · OAK 40.1 | MILW 34 · OAK 41 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
MILW 3–8 OAKOAK leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · OAK has won the last 2 meetings · MILW 1-10 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | OAK 73 @ MILW 60 | MILW +2.5 | OAK W |
| Mar 6, 2024-25 | OAK 72 @ MILW 64 | MILW -7.5 | OAK W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | OAK 66 @ MILW 71 | MILW -5.5 | OAK W |
| Jan 2, 2024-25 | MILW 49 @ OAK 65 | OAK -0.5 | OAK W |
| Mar 12, 2023-24 | MILW 76 vs OAK 83 | OAK -3.5 | OAK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Milwaukee
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
10-18
36% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 90-86 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 76-86 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 92-72 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-101 | +24.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 63-80 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-75 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 81-105 | +12.5 | L −11.5 | 166.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-72 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 68-70 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-87 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 81-71 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 77-55 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-76 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-79 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 67-85 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 60-73 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 82-100 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 76-88 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 65-64 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 69-76 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-76 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-67 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 92-88 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 75-72 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 86-91 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HAMP
W 90-86
−1.5
8
@
WOF
L 76-86
−13.5
10
vs
LR
W 92-72
+16.5
12
@
IU
L 70-101
−6.5
14
@
TTU
L 63-80
+10.5
22
@
WICH
L 58-75
−6.5
29
@
AKR
L 81-105
−11.5
6
vs
RMU
W 74-72
−2.5
14
vs
INST
L 68-70
−4.5
19
vs
SDST
W 88-87
+2.5
21
@
CLE
W 81-71
+3.5
29
vs
PFW
W 77-55
+18.5
30
@
WIS
L 60-80
−0.5
1
@
WRST
L 70-76
−2.5
5
@
GB
L 76-79
−6.5
9
vs
NKU
L 67-85
−19.5
11
vs
IUIN
W 95-83
+3.5
15
vs
OAK
L 60-73
−10.5
18
@
PFW
L 82-100
−14.5
22
@
RMU
L 76-88
−7.5
24
@
YSU
W 65-64
+7.5
30
vs
WRST
L 69-76
−4.5
1
vs
CLE
L 88-90
−11.5
4
vs
DETM
L 63-76
−19.5
7
@
NKU
L 62-67
+1.5
10
@
IUIN
W 92-88
+1.5
15
vs
GB
W 75-72
+0.5
20
@
DETM
L 86-91
−6.5
covered 10didn’t cover 18avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HAMP
W 90-86
+29.5
8
@
WOF
L 76-86
+11.5
10
vs
LR
W 92-72
+7.5
12
@
IU
L 70-101
+5.5
14
@
TTU
L 63-80
−22.5
22
@
WICH
L 58-75
−25.5
29
@
AKR
L 81-105
+19.5
6
vs
RMU
W 74-72
−7.5
14
vs
INST
L 68-70
−21.5
19
vs
SDST
W 88-87
+23.5
21
@
CLE
W 81-71
−8.5
29
vs
PFW
W 77-55
−24.5
30
@
WIS
L 60-80
−17.5
1
@
WRST
L 70-76
−1.5
5
@
GB
L 76-79
+10.5
9
vs
NKU
L 67-85
−5.5
11
vs
IUIN
W 95-83
+12.5
15
vs
OAK
L 60-73
−33.5
18
@
PFW
L 82-100
+33.5
22
@
RMU
L 76-88
+11.5
24
@
YSU
W 65-64
−22.5
30
vs
WRST
L 69-76
−6.5
1
vs
CLE
L 88-90
+17.5
4
vs
DETM
L 63-76
−16.5
7
@
NKU
L 62-67
−27.5
10
@
IUIN
W 92-88
+21.5
15
vs
GB
W 75-72
+1.5
20
@
DETM
L 86-91
+23.5
over 14under 14avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oakland
27 games played
Straight up
13-14
48% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-10
63% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-121 | +24.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 77-87 | +31.5 | W +21.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 45-78 | +30.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 83-87 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 91-97 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-68 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 95-87 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 101-92 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-97 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 63-75 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 82-77 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-79 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 73-88 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 85-83 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 97-74 | -15.5 | W +7.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 84-94 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 161.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-60 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 88-63 | -4.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 85-103 | -14.5 | L −32.5 | 176.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-87 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 74-65 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 78-91 | -7.5 | L −20.5 | 170.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 82-86 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 69-93 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 68-73 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MICH
L 78-121
−18.5
7
@
PUR
L 77-87
+21.5
12
@
HOU
L 45-78
−2.5
17
@
UCF
L 83-87
+9.5
21
@
EMU
L 91-97
−7.5
24
vs
LAM
W 83-68
+11.5
25
@
MONT
W 95-87
+12.5
3
vs
PFW
W 101-92
+4.5
6
vs
TOL
W 98-97
−3.5
13
@
UNI
L 63-75
−3.5
17
@
NKU
W 82-77
+8.5
20
vs
MSU
L 70-79
+10.5
29
@
WRST
L 73-88
−11.5
1
@
YSU
W 85-83
+3.5
4
vs
RMU
W 96-73
+21.5
9
vs
CLE
W 97-74
+7.5
11
vs
WRST
L 84-94
−14.5
15
@
MILW
W 73-60
+10.5
18
@
GB
W 88-63
+20.5
21
vs
IUIN
L 85-103
−32.5
24
@
DETM
W 95-87
+1.5
28
@
PFW
W 74-65
+7.5
1
vs
NKU
W 76-65
+7.5
4
@
CLE
L 78-91
−20.5
12
vs
YSU
L 82-86
−7.5
15
@
RMU
L 69-93
−22.5
20
vs
GB
L 68-73
−11.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MICH
L 78-121
+42.5
7
@
PUR
L 77-87
+5.5
12
@
HOU
L 45-78
−15.5
17
@
UCF
L 83-87
+6.5
21
@
EMU
L 91-97
+34.5
24
vs
LAM
W 83-68
+2.5
25
@
MONT
W 95-87
+19.5
3
vs
PFW
W 101-92
+30.5
6
vs
TOL
W 98-97
+28.5
13
@
UNI
L 63-75
−11.5
17
@
NKU
W 82-77
−4.5
20
vs
MSU
L 70-79
−6.5
29
@
WRST
L 73-88
+1.5
1
@
YSU
W 85-83
+10.5
4
vs
RMU
W 96-73
+7.5
9
vs
CLE
W 97-74
+1.5
11
vs
WRST
L 84-94
+16.5
15
@
MILW
W 73-60
−33.5
18
@
GB
W 88-63
−2.5
21
vs
IUIN
L 85-103
+11.5
24
@
DETM
W 95-87
+14.5
28
@
PFW
W 74-65
−23.5
1
vs
NKU
W 76-65
−25.5
4
@
CLE
L 78-91
−1.5
12
vs
YSU
L 82-86
+12.5
15
@
RMU
L 69-93
+5.5
20
vs
GB
L 68-73
−12.5
over 17under 10avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Milwaukee
10-18 overall · 7-11 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Detroit Mercy86–91
- Wvs Green Bay75–72
- W@ IU Indy92–88
- L@ N Kentucky62–67
- Lvs Detroit Mercy63–76
2 days since their last game.
Oakland
13-14 overall · 10-7 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Green Bay68–73
- L@ Robert Morris69–93
- Lvs Youngstown St82–86
- L@ Cleveland St78–91
- Wvs N Kentucky76–65
2 days since their last game.