Delta Center · at Jazz
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 3-3 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TOR 119–111 · win probability TOR 72%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 230.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TOR has more of the edges
TOR 4, UTAH 2 · 2026-27 so far
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TOR 13.5%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: TOR 20.8%, UTAH 13.3%
Context
Schedule so far
TOR has played the 21st-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
TOR offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 14th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
UTAH offense vs TOR defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TOR 32.6%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: TOR 73.4%, UTAH 77.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: TOR 27.7, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: TOR 41.5, UTAH 33.8
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, TOR 1-2 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: TOR 2-3 ATS, margin +0.8; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TOR 51.0 and allows 53.4; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: TOR plays 105.5 a game (8th fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
TOR hits 32.0% and allows 36.7%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 38.1% and 41.7% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TOR 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: TOR 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelTOR -8.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model230.2
Model edge—
Projected score
TOR 119.2 · UTAH 110.9
Win probability
TOR 72%
1st half
Spread
TOR -4.8
Total
115.2
Projected score
TOR 60 · UTAH 55.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
TOR 5–5 UTAHSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · TOR has won the last 4 meetings · TOR 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2025-26 | TOR 143 @ UTAH 127 | UTAH +8.5 | TOR W |
| Feb 1, 2025-26 | UTAH 100 @ TOR 107 | TOR -10.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 14, 2024-25 | TOR 126 @ UTAH 118 | UTAH -1.5 | TOR W |
| Mar 7, 2024-25 | UTAH 109 @ TOR 118 | TOR -5.5 | TOR W |
| Jan 12, 2023-24 | TOR 113 @ UTAH 145 | UTAH -1.5 | UTAH W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Raptors
6 games played
Straight up
3-3
50% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +3.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
CHI
W 135-92
+32.5
23
@
WSH
W 112-102
+0.5
25
@
MIN
L 94-117
−19.5
28
vs
ORL
W 129-99
+24.5
30
vs
ORL
L 114-121
−12.5
1
@
LAL
L 125-131
−2.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
CHI
W 135-92
−10.5
23
@
WSH
W 112-102
−22.5
25
@
MIN
L 94-117
−17.5
28
vs
ORL
W 129-99
+3.5
30
vs
ORL
L 114-121
+8.5
1
@
LAL
L 125-131
+31.5
over 3under 3avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Raptors has the better starters
Position by position: Raptors 4, Jazz 0, even 1
RaptorsBetterJazz
G I. Quickley16.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.2 ast
Score 33
←TORSmall
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G J. Walter12.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 64
←TORBig
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F S. Barnes24.8 pts · 6.7 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 68
←TORBig
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F R. Barrett19.8 pts · 6.2 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 88
=Even
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
F T. Jackson-Davis3.8 pts · 3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 52
←TORSmall
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
RaptorsBetterJazz
TOR offense14th of 30 · +0.9
←TORBig
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
TOR defense9th of 30 · +3.1
←TORBig
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt+4.4 · 2 players
←TORBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+19.0 · 3 players
←TORBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTOR betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. Quickley31 minJ. Walter29 minJ. Shead22 minA. Martin7 minJ. Bradley4 min
Forwards
S. Barnes33 minR. Barrett32 minT. Jackson-Davis8 minC. Murray-Boyles19 minK. Anderson18 minJ. Battle15 min
Out
J. PoeltlDay-To-DayK. LeonardOut
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 118.2 #10 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.11 #13 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 105.5 #8 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #22 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 32.0 #24 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 38.1 #25 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 27.7 #18 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.5 #3 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 32.6 #2 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 29.2 #2 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 110.3 #13 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.05 #5 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 53.4 #16 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 36.7 #21 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 20.8 #1 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 73.4 #13 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 12.7 #2 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 4.3 #19 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Raptors
3-3 overall · 3-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Lakers125–131
- Lvs Magic114–121
- Wvs Magic129–99
- L@ Timberwolves94–117
- W@ Wizards112–102
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.