Moda Center · at Trail Blazers · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | POR | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-1 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 3-2 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects POR 117–109 · win probability POR 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 225.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: POR has more of the edges
LAC 0, POR 7 · 2026-27 so far
LAC offense vs POR defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; POR 56.2 and allows 51.3
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, POR the 27th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, POR 27.6%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, POR 77.3%
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; POR hits 35.3% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 42.3% and 51.5% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, POR 14.6%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, POR 14.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, POR 35.9. Allowed: LAC 24.7, POR 27.8
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), POR 103.5 (14th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
POR at home. This season: POR 1-1 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; POR 3-2 ATS, margin +11.4
Even
POR offense vs LAC defense
Offense 10th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, POR 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, POR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelPOR -8.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model225.1
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 108.5 · POR 116.5
Win probability
POR 71%
1st half
Spread
POR -4.3
Total
112.8
Projected score
LAC 54.2 · POR 58.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 4-1 80% | 3-2 60% | 2-3 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
LAC 14–4 PORLAC leads · 18 games since 2021-22 · POR has won the last 2 meetings · LAC 10-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2025-26 | LAC 97 @ POR 116 | POR -1.5 | POR W |
| Mar 31, 2025-26 | POR 114 @ LAC 104 | LAC -4.5 | POR W |
| Dec 26, 2025-26 | LAC 119 @ POR 103 | POR +2.5 | LAC W |
| Oct 26, 2025-26 | POR 107 @ LAC 114 | LAC -8.5 | POR W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | LAC 118 @ POR 89 | POR +7.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Trail Blazers
5 games played
Straight up
4-1
80% wins
Against the spread
3-2
60% covers · avg +6.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-3
40% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
+37.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
−1.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+8.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−28.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
+15.5
covered 3didn’t cover 2avg +6.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
−25.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
+16.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+30.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−6.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
−30.5
over 2under 3avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Trail Blazers has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 1, Trail Blazers 3, even 1
ClippersBetterTrail Blazers
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→PORBig
G D. Lillard19.2 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 89
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
=Even
G S. Henderson8.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→PORBig
F D. Avdija23 pts · 6.8 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 82
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
←LACBig
F T. Camara15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→PORBig
C D. Clingan8.6 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 74
ClippersBetterTrail Blazers
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
→PORBig
POR defense11th of 30 · +1.8
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
=Even
POR offense10th of 30 · +1.4
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→PORBig
Backcourt+11.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→PORBig
Frontcourt+16.7 · 3 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
→PORBig
Bench+15.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterPOR betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
D. Lillard29 minS. Henderson21 minJ. Holiday25 minS. Cissoko22 minV. Krejci11 minC. Youngblood6 min
Forwards
D. Avdija31 minT. Camara26 minJ. Tonje8 min
Centers
D. Clingan22 minM. Potter19 minR. Williams17 minB. Carlson12 minY. Hansen10 min
Out
J. MorantOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 120.6 #4 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.16 #5 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 103.5 #14 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #4 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 35.3 #12 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.5 #1 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #3 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 14.6 #9 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.6 #14 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 26.2 #17 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 109.2 #10 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #10 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #8 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #8 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 14.8 #20 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.3 #3 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 8.6 #18 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #21 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Trail Blazers
4-1 overall · 4-1 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Jazz112–90
- Lvs Grizzlies103–124
- W@ Lakers136–129
- W@ Kings128–120
- Wvs Suns124–83
A week or more of rest.