Kia Center · at Magic
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SA 117–109 · win probability SA 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 226.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SA has more of the edges
SA 4, ORL 2 · 2026-27 so far
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SA 13.1%, ORL 17.0%. Forced: SA 15.7%, ORL 13.6%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SA 27.2%, ORL 23.4%. Defensive: SA 75.8%, ORL 68.9%
ORL offense vs SA defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SA has played the 15th-hardest schedule, ORL the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
SA offense vs ORL defense
Offense 5th of 30 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
SA hits 34.9% and allows 37.3%; ORL hits 35.4% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 39.0% and 46.5% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: SA plays 104.3 a game (11th fastest), ORL 101.9 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ORL at home. This season: ORL 0-3 at home, SA 2-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SA 53.3 and allows 52.1; ORL 53.4 and allows 53.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SA 24.5, ORL 31.7. Allowed: SA 21.7, ORL 29.8
Even
Recent form
Last 5: SA 2-3 ATS, margin +11.0; ORL 2-3 ATS, margin -9.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SA 100%, ORL 100%. Transfers in: SA 0, ORL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelSA -7.4
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model226.0
Model edge—
Projected score
SA 116.7 · ORL 109.3
Win probability
SA 70%
1st half
Spread
SA -4.3
Total
113.3
Projected score
SA 58.8 · ORL 54.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
SA 5–5 ORLSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · SA has won the last 2 meetings · SA 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025-26 | ORL 103 @ SA 112 | SA -4.5 | SA W |
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | SA 114 @ ORL 112 | ORL -8.5 | SA W |
| Apr 1, 2024-25 | ORL 116 @ SA 105 | SA +5.5 | ORL W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | SA 111 @ ORL 112 | ORL -2.5 | SA W |
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | SA 111 @ ORL 127 | ORL -10.5 | ORL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Spurs
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −3.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−10.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−8.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
+1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+7.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−7.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
−2.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−9.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−0.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
−1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+0.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−4.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
+1.5
over 2under 4avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Magic
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
−9.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−23.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
+15.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
−24.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+12.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−4.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
+23.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−26.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
−11.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
+3.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+8.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−16.5
over 3under 3avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Spurs has the better starters
Position by position: Spurs 4, Magic 0, even 1
SpursBetterMagic
G D. Harper18.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 4.8 ast
Score 98
←SABig
G D. Bane17.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 62
G D. Vassell12 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 53
←SABig
G J. Richardson5.3 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 3
G D. Fox16.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 7 ast
Score 84
=Even
F F. Wagner19.7 pts · 6.7 reb · 7.8 ast
Score 90
G S. Castle14.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 69
←SASmall
F T. da Silva14.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
F V. Wembanyama28 pts · 10.7 reb · 3 ast
Score 98
←SABig
C W. Carter13.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
SpursBetterMagic
SA offense5th of 30 · +2.9
←SASmall
ORL defense15th of 30 · -0.1
SA defense7th of 30 · +3.7
←SABig
ORL offense21st of 30 · -1.5
Backcourt+42.2 · 4 players
←SABig
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.3 · 1 player
←SASmall
Frontcourt+14.7 · 3 players
Bench+19.9 · 5 players
←SABig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSA betterORL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Harper34 minD. Vassell33 minD. Fox32 minS. Castle29 minJ. McLaughlin6 minJ. Gillespie2 min
Forwards
V. Wembanyama33 minJ. Champagnie28 minK. Johnson22 minC. Bryant9 minH. Barnes8 minD. Jones Garcia6 min
Centers
L. Kornet15 minT. Reed4 min
Guards
D. Bane35 minJ. Richardson20 minJ. Carter18 minA. Morales6 min
Forwards
F. Wagner35 minT. da Silva29 minJ. Cain15 min
Centers
W. Carter32 minG. Bitadze9 minN. Vucevic9 minC. Castleton5 min
Out
J. SuggsOutP. BancheroOutA. BlackOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 117.3 #12 | Points per game | 107.7 #26 |
| 1.12 #10 | Points per possession | 1.07 #21 |
| 104.3 #11 | Pace (possessions) | 101.9 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #16 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #15 |
| 34.9 #17 | 3-point % | 35.4 #11 |
| 39.0 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #6 |
| 24.5 #24 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #9 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #2 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #24 |
| 27.2 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.4 #26 |
| 27.5 #9 | Assists per game | 26.3 #16 |
| Defense | ||
| 110.2 #12 | Points allowed | 116.7 #22 |
| 1.06 #6 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #24 |
| 52.1 #11 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #13 |
| 37.3 #23 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #13 |
| 15.7 #14 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #26 |
| 75.8 #7 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #26 |
| 9.2 #10 | Steals per game | 7.0 #26 |
| 7.0 #1 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #23 |
Spurs
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Timberwolves121–111
- W@ Jazz117–111
- Wvs Kings130–103
- W@ Mavericks122–106
- Lvs Rockets110–114
A week or more of rest.
Magic
2-4 overall · 2-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Celtics97–108
- W@ Raptors121–114
- L@ Raptors99–129
- W@ Knicks111–102
- Lvs Timberwolves93–115
A week or more of rest.