Fiserv Forum · at Bucks
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 1-5 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 5-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 119–114 · win probability MEM 64%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 233.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 6, MIL 1 · 2026-27 so far
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4
MEM offense vs MIL defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 42.1% and 45.9% of their shots
MIL offense vs MEM defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, MIL 15.8%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, MIL 12.2%
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, MIL the 23rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), MIL 106.2 (4th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MIL at home. This season: MIL 1-3 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, MIL 29.7%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, MIL 74.2%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, MIL 23.9. Allowed: MEM 31.4, MIL 29.7
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, MIL 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, MIL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -5.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model233.1
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 119.1 · MIL 114
Win probability
MEM 64%
1st half
Spread
MEM -3.1
Total
116.6
Projected score
MEM 59.8 · MIL 56.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 8–2 MILMEM leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · MEM 8-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2025-26 | MEM 115 @ MIL 131 | MIL -7.5 | MIL W |
| Dec 26, 2025-26 | MIL 104 @ MEM 125 | MEM -5.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 2, 2024-25 | MEM 132 @ MIL 119 | MIL -3.5 | MEM W |
| Oct 31, 2024-25 | MIL 99 @ MEM 122 | MEM +6.5 | MEM W |
| Apr 3, 2023-24 | MEM 111 @ MIL 101 | MIL -12.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 4, Bucks 1, even 0
GrizzliesBetterBucks
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMBig
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
←MEMBig
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→MILSmall
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
←MEMBig
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
GrizzliesBetterBucks
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
←MEMBig
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
←MEMBig
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→MILBig
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterMIL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 113.0 #17 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.07 #20 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #4 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #21 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 33.9 #21 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #8 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 23.9 #25 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #18 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.7 #8 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 26.0 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 126.2 #28 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.4 #24 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #14 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 12.2 #30 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.2 #10 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 5.7 #30 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #27 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.