Fiserv Forum · at Bucks · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 5-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLE 122–112 · win probability CLE 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 234.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLE has more of the edges
CLE 6, MIL 2 · 2026-27 so far
CLE offense vs MIL defense
Offense 2nd of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: CLE 55.3 and allows 52.5; MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4
Free throws
Free throw rate: CLE 28.9, MIL 23.9. Allowed: CLE 23.2, MIL 29.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CLE 14.2%, MIL 15.8%. Forced: CLE 14.1%, MIL 12.2%
Three-pointers
CLE hits 37.0% and allows 33.7%; MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 43.6% and 45.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CLE 26.7%, MIL 29.7%. Defensive: CLE 73.9%, MIL 74.2%
MIL offense vs CLE defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MIL at home. This season: MIL 1-3 at home, CLE 1-2 away
Context
Schedule so far
CLE has played the 24th-hardest schedule, MIL the 23rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 106 possessions: CLE plays 106.2 a game (3rd fastest), MIL 106.2 (4th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CLE 2-3 ATS, margin +7.6; MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CLE 100%, MIL 100%. Transfers in: CLE 0, MIL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelCLE -10.6
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model234.3
Model edge—
Projected score
CLE 122.4 · MIL 111.9
Win probability
CLE 78%
1st half
Spread
CLE -6.1
Total
117.2
Projected score
CLE 61.6 · MIL 55.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 21 since 2021-22
CLE 15–6 MILCLE leads · 21 games since 2021-22 · CLE has won the last 2 meetings · CLE 13-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026-27 | CLE 136 @ MIL 111 | MIL +8.5 | CLE W |
| Mar 17, 2025-26 | CLE 123 @ MIL 116 | MIL +12.5 | MIL W |
| Feb 25, 2025-26 | CLE 116 @ MIL 118 | MIL +3.5 | MIL W |
| Nov 17, 2025-26 | MIL 106 @ CLE 118 | CLE -5.5 | CLE W |
| Oct 26, 2025-26 | MIL 113 @ CLE 118 | CLE -6.5 | MIL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cavaliers
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−5.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
−7.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
−1.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
+0.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−1.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−17.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
+17.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
+17.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
−8.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−12.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+12.5
over 3under 3avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cavaliers has the better starters
Position by position: Cavaliers 4, Bucks 0, even 1
CavaliersBetterBucks
G J. Harden16.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 53
←CLEBig
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
G D. Mitchell22.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 86
←CLEBig
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
G S. Merrill8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
←CLEBig
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
C E. Mobley19.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 30
=Even
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
C J. Allen15.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 100
←CLEBig
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
CavaliersBetterBucks
CLE offense2nd of 30 · +4.0
←CLEBig
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
CLE defense20th of 30 · -1.2
←CLESmall
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
Backcourt+25.3 · 3 players
←CLEBig
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.9 · 2 players
←CLEBig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
←CLEBig
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCLE betterMIL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Harden34 minD. Mitchell33 minS. Merrill24 minM. Thomas21 minT. Proctor12 minC. Porter8 min
Forwards
M. Hezonja18 minT. Enaruna10 minR. Minix7 min
Centers
E. Mobley33 minJ. Allen28 minT. Bryant11 minE. UdehNew
Out
P. WatsonDay-To-DayJ. TysonOut
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.0 #2 | Points per game | 113.0 #17 |
| 1.14 #7 | Points per possession | 1.07 #20 |
| 106.2 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #4 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #7 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #21 |
| 37.0 #8 | 3-point % | 33.9 #21 |
| 43.6 #12 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #8 |
| 28.9 #13 | Free throw rate | 23.9 #25 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #6 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #18 |
| 26.7 #20 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.7 #8 |
| 28.7 #4 | Assists per game | 26.0 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #20 | Points allowed | 126.2 #28 |
| 1.09 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 52.5 #12 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.4 #24 |
| 33.7 #11 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #14 |
| 14.1 #25 | Turnovers forced | 12.2 #30 |
| 73.9 #11 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.2 #10 |
| 7.8 #22 | Steals per game | 5.7 #30 |
| 6.3 #6 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #27 |
Cavaliers
4-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Bucks136–111
- L@ Hawks111–114
- Wvs Wizards121–111
- Wvs Timberwolves127–125
- Wvs Nets125–121
A week or more of rest.
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.