Paycom Center · at Thunder · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OKC | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-2 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 1-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OKC 119–107 · win probability OKC 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 226.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OKC has more of the edges
UTAH 0, OKC 5 · 2026-27 so far
UTAH offense vs OKC defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTAH 17.0%, OKC 14.5%. Forced: UTAH 13.3%, OKC 15.8%
OKC offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 18th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: UTAH plays 104.0 a game (12th fastest), OKC 101.1 (27th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
OKC at home. This season: OKC 3-0 at home, UTAH 0-1 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9; OKC 49.5 and allows 51.0
Even
Recent form
Last 5: UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2; OKC 2-3 ATS, margin -3.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTAH 31.6, OKC 21.8. Allowed: UTAH 33.8, OKC 23.4
Even
Three-pointers
UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%; OKC hits 30.9% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 41.7% and 35.8% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTAH 25.7%, OKC 28.5%. Defensive: UTAH 77.1%, OKC 71.4%
Context
Schedule so far
UTAH has played the 4th-hardest schedule, OKC the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTAH 100%, OKC 100%. Transfers in: UTAH 0, OKC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelOKC -12.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model226.7
Model edge—
Projected score
UTAH 107.3 · OKC 119.4
Win probability
OKC 81%
1st half
Spread
OKC -6.7
Total
113.6
Projected score
UTAH 53.4 · OKC 60.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | |
| 4-2 67% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 20 since 2021-22
UTAH 6–14 OKCOKC leads · 20 games since 2021-22 · OKC has won the last 9 meetings · UTAH 6-14 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2025-26 | UTAH 111 @ OKC 146 | OKC -24.5 | OKC W |
| Jan 7, 2025-26 | UTAH 125 @ OKC 129 | OKC -19.5 | UTAH W |
| Dec 7, 2025-26 | OKC 131 @ UTAH 101 | UTAH +11.5 | OKC W |
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | OKC 144 @ UTAH 112 | UTAH +16.5 | OKC W |
| Apr 11, 2024-25 | OKC 145 @ UTAH 111 | UTAH +8.5 | OKC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Thunder
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −12.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
+10.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
+4.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−9.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+2.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−28.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−18.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
SA
W 116-104
−9.5
22
vs
DEN
W 96-84
−56.5
25
vs
LAC
W 108-101
−14.5
26
vs
PHX
W 125-114
+17.5
28
@
DAL
L 96-120
−11.5
31
@
HOU
L 98-119
−2.5
over 1under 5avg −12.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Thunder has the better starters
Position by position: Jazz 1, Thunder 3, even 1
JazzBetterThunder
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
→OKCBig
G S. Gilgeous-Alexander26 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 88
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
→OKCBig
G A. Mitchell16.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
=Even
G J. McCain10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 8
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
←UTAHBig
G K. Williams5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
→OKCBig
C I. Hartenstein9.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
JazzBetterThunder
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
→OKCBig
OKC defense2nd of 30 · +6.2
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
→OKCSmall
OKC offense18th of 30 · -1.1
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
→OKCBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
←UTAHSmall
Frontcourt+12.0 · 1 player
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
←UTAHBig
Bench-4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTAH betterOKC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Guards
S. Gilgeous-Alexander33 minA. Mitchell26 minJ. McCain25 minK. Williams14 minJ. Dix18 minB. Stirtz16 min
Forwards
J. Williams18 minB. Barnhizer9 min
Centers
I. Hartenstein24 minA. Mara18 min
Out
A. CarusoOutC. HolmgrenOutJ. WilliamsOutC. WallaceOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.7 #24 | Points per game | 106.5 #29 |
| 1.05 #25 | Points per possession | 1.05 #23 |
| 104.0 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 101.1 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #24 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #28 |
| 32.6 #23 | 3-point % | 30.9 #26 |
| 41.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.8 #29 |
| 31.6 #10 | Free throw rate | 21.8 #28 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #25 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #7 |
| 25.7 #22 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.5 #10 |
| 26.2 #19 | Assists per game | 21.7 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 118.8 #25 | Points allowed | 107.0 #5 |
| 1.14 #25 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #7 |
| 53.9 #18 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #6 |
| 37.6 #25 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #17 |
| 13.3 #28 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #13 |
| 77.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #18 |
| 6.2 #29 | Steals per game | 8.3 #20 |
| 6.5 #5 | Blocks per game | 6.3 #7 |
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.
Thunder
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Rockets98–119
- L@ Mavericks96–120
- Wvs Suns125–114
- Wvs Clippers108–101
- Wvs Nuggets96–84
A week or more of rest.