Delta Center · at Jazz · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAC 116–113 · win probability LAC 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 229.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LAC has more of the edges
LAC 4, UTAH 2 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 42.3% and 41.7% of their shots
UTAH offense vs LAC defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: LAC 24.7, UTAH 33.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, UTAH 77.1%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, UTAH 13.3%
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
Even
LAC offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAC -3.8
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model229.0
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 116.4 · UTAH 112.6
Win probability
LAC 61%
1st half
Spread
LAC -2.3
Total
114.7
Projected score
LAC 58.5 · UTAH 56.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
LAC 10–8 UTAHLAC leads · 18 games since 2021-22 · LAC has won the last 2 meetings · LAC 9-9 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2025-26 | LAC 115 @ UTAH 103 | UTAH +8.5 | LAC W |
| Jan 1, 2025-26 | UTAH 101 @ LAC 118 | LAC -13.5 | LAC W |
| Oct 22, 2025-26 | LAC 108 @ UTAH 129 | UTAH +10.5 | UTAH W |
| Feb 13, 2024-25 | LAC 120 @ UTAH 116 | UTAH +9.5 | UTAH W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | UTAH 110 @ LAC 130 | LAC -17.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Clippers 1, Jazz 1, even 3
ClippersBetterJazz
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
←LACSmall
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
=Even
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
=Even
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→UTAHSmall
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
ClippersBetterJazz
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
=Even
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
←LACSmall
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
←LACBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→UTAHBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
←LACSmall
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.