Target Center · at Timberwolves · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-2 | Record | 4-3 |
| 4-3 | ATS | 6-1 |
| 4-3 | O/U | 4-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIN 120–113 · win probability MIN 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 233.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIN has more of the edges
LAL 2, MIN 4 · 2026-27 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAL 26.8%, MIN 30.0%. Defensive: LAL 67.4%, MIN 75.4%
MIN offense vs LAL defense
Offense 3rd of 30 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LAL has played the 16th-hardest schedule, MIN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAL 37.2, MIN 26.1. Allowed: LAL 30.7, MIN 28.9
Three-pointers
LAL hits 38.9% and allows 36.7%; MIN hits 37.6% and allows 31.2%. Threes are 45.7% and 42.8% of their shots
Home court
MIN at home. This season: MIN 2-1 at home, LAL 2-1 away
LAL offense vs MIN defense
Offense 4th of 30 against a defense 8th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: LAL plays 102.9 a game (17th fastest), MIN 105.4 (9th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAL 60.1 and allows 53.7; MIN 55.8 and allows 50.5
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAL 3-2 ATS, margin +1.4; MIN 4-1 ATS, margin +6.4
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAL 18.3%, MIN 15.1%. Forced: LAL 17.8%, MIN 15.6%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAL 100%, MIN 100%. Transfers in: LAL 0, MIN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMIN -7.4
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model233.3
Model edge—
Projected score
LAL 113 · MIN 120.4
Win probability
MIN 70%
1st half
Spread
MIN -4.0
Total
116.7
Projected score
LAL 56.3 · MIN 60.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-2 71% | 4-3 57% | 4-3 57% | |
| 4-3 57% | 6-1 86% | 4-3 57% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 24 since 2021-22
LAL 10–14 MINMIN leads · 24 games since 2021-22 · LAL has won the last 3 meetings · LAL 10-14 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025-26 | MIN 106 @ LAL 120 | LAL +2.5 | LAL W |
| Oct 29, 2025-26 | LAL 116 @ MIN 115 | MIN -7.5 | LAL W |
| Oct 24, 2025-26 | MIN 110 @ LAL 128 | LAL +1.5 | LAL W |
| Apr 30, 2024-25 | MIN 103 @ LAL 96 | LAL -5.5 | MIN W |
| Apr 27, 2024-25 | LAL 113 @ MIN 116 | MIN -2.5 | MIN W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lakers
7 games played
Straight up
5-2
71% wins
Against the spread
4-3
57% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-3
57% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | vs | W 127-105 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 233.5 | U 232 |
| Oct 23 | vs | W 125-117 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 225.5 | O 242 |
| Oct 25 | @ | W 132-123 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 237.5 | O 255 |
| Oct 27 | vs | L 129-136 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 234.5 | O 265 |
| Oct 28 | @ | W 103-87 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 224.5 | U 190 |
| Oct 30 | @ | L 95-112 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 234.5 | U 207 |
| Nov 1 | vs | W 131-125 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 224.5 | O 256 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
+15.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
−0.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+2.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
−8.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
+17.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−19.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+2.5
covered 4didn’t cover 3avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
−1.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
+16.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+17.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
+30.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
−34.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−27.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+31.5
over 4under 3avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Timberwolves
7 games played
Straight up
4-3
57% wins
Against the spread
6-1
86% covers · avg +12.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-3
57% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | @ | W 131-106 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 240.5 | U 237 |
| Oct 23 | @ | W 115-93 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 234.5 | U 208 |
| Oct 25 | vs | W 117-94 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 228.5 | U 211 |
| Oct 26 | @ | L 125-127 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 234.5 | O 252 |
| Oct 28 | vs | L 114-119 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 227.5 | O 233 |
| Oct 30 | vs | W 127-101 | -6.5 | W +19.5 | 222.5 | O 228 |
| Oct 31 | @ | L 111-121 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 230.5 | O 232 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MIA
W 131-106
+26.5
23
@
ORL
W 115-93
+23.5
25
vs
TOR
W 117-94
+19.5
26
@
CLE
L 125-127
+1.5
28
vs
GS
L 114-119
−8.5
30
vs
LAC
W 127-101
+19.5
31
@
SA
L 111-121
+2.5
covered 6didn’t cover 1avg +12.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MIA
W 131-106
−3.5
23
@
ORL
W 115-93
−26.5
25
vs
TOR
W 117-94
−17.5
26
@
CLE
L 125-127
+17.5
28
vs
GS
L 114-119
+5.5
30
vs
LAC
W 127-101
+5.5
31
@
SA
L 111-121
+1.5
over 4under 3avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Timberwolves has the better starters
Position by position: Lakers 1, Timberwolves 3, even 1
LakersBetterTimberwolves
G A. Reaves23.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 82
←LALBig
G A. Dosunmu15.3 pts · 5 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 42
G L. Doncic37.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 79
=Even
G L. Ball14.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 91
G M. Thybulle9 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 50
→MINBig
F J. McDaniels17.3 pts · 6 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 96
F J. LaRavia5.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 70
→MINSmall
F J. Kuminga12.9 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
C W. Kessler14.3 pts · 9.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
→MINBig
C R. Gobert7 pts · 12.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 98
LakersBetterTimberwolves
LAL offense4th of 30 · +3.2
=Even
MIN defense8th of 30 · +3.6
LAL defense17th of 30 · -0.2
→MINBig
MIN offense3rd of 30 · +3.7
Backcourt+24.2 · 3 players
←LALBig
Backcourt+12.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+7.4 · 2 players
→MINBig
Frontcourt+46.4 · 3 players
Bench+6.7 · 5 players
←LALBig
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAL betterMIN betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Reaves36 minL. Doncic36 minM. Thybulle25 minQ. Grimes27 minC. Sexton18 minJ. Hardy16 min
Forwards
J. LaRavia23 minS. Mamukelashvili24 minJ. Vanderbilt15 minK. Looney8 minA. KalumaNewA. OkerekeNew
Centers
W. Kessler31 min
Out
Z. WilliamsOut
Guards
A. Dosunmu29 minL. Ball25 minT. Shannon22 minB. Hyland12 minJ. Clark9 minZ. Pullin8 min
Forwards
J. McDaniels33 minJ. Kuminga30 minC. Williams24 minJ. Beringer19 minT. Lyles16 minI. Evans3 min
Centers
R. Gobert30 min
Out
A. EdwardsOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 120.3 #5 | Points per game | 120.0 #6 |
| 1.18 #2 | Points per possession | 1.13 #8 |
| 102.9 #17 | Pace (possessions) | 105.4 #9 |
| Shooting | ||
| 60.1 #1 | Effective FG% | 55.8 #6 |
| 38.9 #4 | 3-point % | 37.6 #6 |
| 45.7 #9 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #16 |
| 37.2 #2 | Free throw rate | 26.1 #21 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #28 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #12 |
| 26.8 #19 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.0 #7 |
| 23.4 #27 | Assists per game | 27.3 #11 |
| Defense | ||
| 115.0 #17 | Points allowed | 108.7 #8 |
| 1.11 #19 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #4 |
| 53.7 #17 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #5 |
| 36.7 #22 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.2 #6 |
| 17.8 #4 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #17 |
| 67.4 #29 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.4 #8 |
| 10.4 #4 | Steals per game | 9.0 #13 |
| 6.7 #3 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #20 |
Lakers
5-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Raptors131–125
- L@ Warriors95–112
- W@ Clippers103–87
- Lvs Trail Blazers129–136
- W@ Jazz132–123
A week or more of rest.
Timberwolves
4-3 overall · 1-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Spurs111–121
- Wvs Clippers127–101
- Lvs Warriors114–119
- L@ Cavaliers125–127
- Wvs Raptors117–94
A week or more of rest.