Dale E. and Sarah Ann Fowler Events Center · at CA Baptist
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CBU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CBU 82–66 · win probability CBU 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CBU has more of the edges
UAPB 0, CBU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UAPB 27.9%, CBU 37.5%. Defensive: UAPB 65.8%, CBU 72.8%
UAPB offense vs CBU defense
Offense 337th of 366 against a defense 178th, on the model’s ratings
CBU offense vs UAPB defense
Offense 246th of 366 against a defense 365th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UAPB has played the 300th-hardest schedule, CBU the 202nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UAPB plays 71.5 a game (53rd fastest), CBU 68.3 (217th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: UAPB 50.0 and allows 52.6; CBU 48.3 and allows 46.3
Three-pointers
UAPB hits 33.6% and allows 33.2%; CBU hits 33.4% and allows 29.5%. Threes are 37.1% and 32.0% of their shots
Home court
CBU at home. This season: CBU 0-0 at home, UAPB 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UAPB 18.7%, CBU 18.0%. Forced: UAPB 16.4%, CBU 16.9%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UAPB 38.4, CBU 35.9. Allowed: UAPB 43.6, CBU 36.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UAPB 8%, CBU 18%. Transfers in: UAPB 3, CBU 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CBU -16.6 | — |
| Total | — | 148.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | UAPB 65.8 · CBU 82.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CBU -9.7 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UAPB 29.8 · CBU 39.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
AR-Pine Bluff
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-94 | +34.5 | L −9.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 74-83 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-94 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 69-95 | +36.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 75-104 | +41.5 | W +12.5 | 172.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-106 | +35.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-98 | +20.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 84-111 | +21.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 63-62 | +16.5 | W +17.5 | 163.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-76 | +23.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 84-117 | +25.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 95-83 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 90-79 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 74-66 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 61-73 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-71 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 82-87 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-74 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 78-70 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 67-64 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 84-63 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 61-79 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 70-82 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 64-83 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-82 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-70 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 83-48 | -1.5 | W +33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 81-84 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WASH
L 50-94
−9.5
6
@
PORT
L 74-83
+3.5
8
@
LMU
L 72-94
−2.5
11
@
OU
L 69-95
+10.5
15
@
VAN
L 75-104
+12.5
18
@
SMU
L 60-106
−10.5
20
@
MRSH
L 70-98
−7.5
23
@
M-OH
L 84-111
−5.5
3
@
UIC
W 63-62
+17.5
6
@
DEP
L 72-76
+19.5
10
@
TLSA
L 84-117
−7.5
3
vs
AAMU
W 95-83
+13.5
5
vs
ALST
W 90-79
+12.5
10
@
TXSO
W 74-66
+9.5
12
@
PV
L 61-73
−8.5
17
vs
FAMU
L 67-71
−6.5
19
vs
BCU
L 82-87
−2.5
24
@
SOU
W 75-74
+10.5
31
@
MVSU
W 78-70
−2.5
4
@
GRAM
W 67-64
+9.5
7
vs
ALCN
W 84-77
−0.5
9
vs
JKST
W 84-63
+13.5
14
@
ALST
L 61-79
−14.5
16
@
AAMU
L 70-82
−8.5
19
vs
TXSO
L 64-83
−20.5
21
vs
PV
W 84-82
−1.5
28
vs
MVSU
L 69-70
−15.5
3
@
JKST
L 78-81
−4.5
5
@
ALCN
W 83-48
+33.5
12
vs
SOU
L 81-84
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WASH
L 50-94
−16.5
6
@
PORT
L 74-83
−7.5
8
@
LMU
L 72-94
+8.5
11
@
OU
L 69-95
−4.5
15
@
VAN
L 75-104
+6.5
18
@
SMU
L 60-106
−2.5
20
@
MRSH
L 70-98
+3.5
23
@
M-OH
L 84-111
+34.5
3
@
UIC
W 63-62
−38.5
6
@
DEP
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
TLSA
L 84-117
+45.5
3
vs
AAMU
W 95-83
+28.5
5
vs
ALST
W 90-79
+9.5
10
@
TXSO
W 74-66
−22.5
12
@
PV
L 61-73
−30.5
17
vs
FAMU
L 67-71
−11.5
19
vs
BCU
L 82-87
+13.5
24
@
SOU
W 75-74
−5.5
31
@
MVSU
W 78-70
+4.5
4
@
GRAM
W 67-64
−14.5
7
vs
ALCN
W 84-77
+15.5
9
vs
JKST
W 84-63
−8.5
14
@
ALST
L 61-79
−9.5
16
@
AAMU
L 70-82
+7.5
19
vs
TXSO
L 64-83
−5.5
21
vs
PV
W 84-82
+6.5
28
vs
MVSU
L 69-70
−8.5
3
@
JKST
L 78-81
+5.5
5
@
ALCN
W 83-48
−14.5
12
vs
SOU
L 81-84
+13.5
over 14under 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
CA Baptist
34 games played
Straight up
25-9
74% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-22
35% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-75 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 69-61 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 69-59 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 72-59 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-61 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-69 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 70-78 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 60-91 | +18.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 85-91 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 12 | @ | W 88-83 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 75-67 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 74-67 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 66-73 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 51-63 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-72 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 58-55 | -14.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 74-58 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 78-71 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-77 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 56-55 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-63 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 83-66 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-70 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 46-65 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 68-56 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-67 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 87-48 | -9.5 | W +29.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 82-75 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 63-61 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 60-68 | +14.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UPST
W 87-75
−2.5
7
@
UCI
W 69-61
+16.5
14
vs
WIU
W 69-59
−5.5
18
vs
UCR
W 80-57
+10.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 72-59
−1.5
25
vs
USD
W 76-61
+7.5
29
@
ORST
W 75-69
+7.5
1
@
COLO
L 70-78
+5.5
3
@
BYU
L 60-91
−12.5
6
@
UTAH
L 85-91
−0.5
12
@
EWU
W 88-83
+1.5
16
vs
SOU
W 75-67
−4.5
20
vs
SAC
W 74-67
−7.5
29
@
UVU
L 66-73
+0.5
1
@
UTA
L 51-63
−14.5
3
@
TAR
L 76-81
−3.5
8
vs
UTU
W 84-72
+4.5
10
vs
SUU
W 58-55
−11.5
15
@
ACU
W 74-58
+17.5
21
vs
UTU
W 73-64
+0.5
24
vs
UVU
W 78-71
+5.5
31
@
UTA
W 87-77
+8.5
5
vs
TAR
W 56-55
−9.5
7
vs
ACU
W 65-63
−6.5
12
@
SUU
W 83-66
+11.5
14
@
UTU
L 65-70
−7.5
19
@
UVU
L 46-65
−10.5
26
vs
UTA
W 68-56
+5.5
28
vs
TAR
W 82-67
+6.5
5
vs
ACU
W 87-48
+29.5
7
@
SUU
W 82-75
+0.5
13
vs
UTU
W 86-72
+5.5
14
vs
UVU
W 63-61
+4.5
20
vs
KU
L 60-68
+6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UPST
W 87-75
+9.5
7
@
UCI
W 69-61
−17.5
14
vs
WIU
W 69-59
−12.5
18
vs
UCR
W 80-57
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 72-59
−13.5
25
vs
USD
W 76-61
−9.5
29
@
ORST
W 75-69
+6.5
1
@
COLO
L 70-78
−2.5
3
@
BYU
L 60-91
−2.5
6
@
UTAH
L 85-91
+30.5
12
@
EWU
W 88-83
+17.5
16
vs
SOU
W 75-67
−13.5
20
vs
SAC
W 74-67
−17.5
29
@
UVU
L 66-73
−9.5
1
@
UTA
L 51-63
−20.5
3
@
TAR
L 76-81
+9.5
8
vs
UTU
W 84-72
+11.5
10
vs
SUU
W 58-55
−37.5
15
@
ACU
W 74-58
−8.5
21
vs
UTU
W 73-64
−6.5
24
vs
UVU
W 78-71
+1.5
31
@
UTA
W 87-77
+29.5
5
vs
TAR
W 56-55
−27.5
7
vs
ACU
W 65-63
−7.5
12
@
SUU
W 83-66
+1.5
14
@
UTU
L 65-70
−8.5
19
@
UVU
L 46-65
−31.5
26
vs
UTA
W 68-56
−10.5
28
vs
TAR
W 82-67
+9.5
5
vs
ACU
W 87-48
−1.5
7
@
SUU
W 82-75
+8.5
13
vs
UTU
W 86-72
+13.5
14
vs
UVU
W 63-61
−15.5
20
vs
KU
L 60-68
−14.5
over 12under 22avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
CA Baptist has the better starters
Position by position: AR-Pine Bluff 0, CA Baptist 1, even 4
AR-Pine BluffBetterCA Baptist
G J. Tatum TR7.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 25
→CBUBig
G E. Duncan TR10.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 67
G J. Hayes4.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Muller4.4 pts · 1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 7
G D. Giddens TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Dollar1.9 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
G H. Pickett0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F R. D'Amelio2.6 pts · 3 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F C. Smith TR0.6 pts · 1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F N. Richart TR0.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
AR-Pine BluffBetterCA Baptist
UAPB offense337th of 366 · -11.1
→CBUBig
CBU defense178th of 366 · -4.0
UAPB defense365th of 366 · -12.7
→CBUSmall
CBU offense246th of 366 · -7.5
Backcourt-5.1 · 4 players
→CBUSmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.7 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUAPB betterCBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Tatum27 min · TRJ. Hayes15 minD. Giddens9 min · TRH. Pickett1 minD. CapriottiNewE. HernandezNew
Forwards
C. Smith7 min · TRC. WilliamsonNewM. WilliamsNewJ. NyakundiNew
Guards
E. Duncan21 min · TRJ. Muller21 minJ. Dollar5 minT. ConerNewJ. StonkusNewO. BlanksonNew
Forwards
R. D'Amelio11 minN. Richart7 min · TRA. MilenkovicNewJ. ZilinskasNewA. SafinNew
Centers
M. KovacNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.0 #195 | Points per game | 72.7 #230 |
| 1.04 #277 | Points per possession | 1.07 #209 |
| 71.5 #53 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #217 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #233 | Effective FG% | 48.3 #308 |
| 33.6 #190 | 3-point % | 33.4 #200 |
| 37.1 #227 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.0 #330 |
| 38.4 #91 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #154 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #310 | Turnover rate | 18.0 #270 |
| 27.9 #271 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.5 #13 |
| 14.1 #136 | Assists per game | 10.2 #355 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.9 #340 | Points allowed | 67.6 #28 |
| 1.14 #309 | Points allowed per possession | 0.99 #18 |
| 52.6 #249 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.3 #16 |
| 33.2 #136 | Opponent 3-point % | 29.5 #5 |
| 16.4 #192 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #159 |
| 65.8 #321 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #41 |
| 6.8 #142 | Steals per game | 5.5 #296 |
| 2.9 #244 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #253 |
AR-Pine Bluff
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern81–84
- W@ Alcorn St83–48
- L@ Jackson St78–81
- Lvs Miss Valley St69–70
- Wvs Prairie View84–82
A week or more of rest.
CA Baptist
25-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-5 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kansas60–68
- Wvs Utah Valley63–61
- Wvs Utah Tech86–72
- W@ Southern Utah82–75
- Wvs Abilene Chrstn87–48
A week or more of rest.