SECU Arena · at Towson
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TOW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TOW 74–64 · win probability TOW 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 137.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TOW has more of the edges
LIU 2, TOW 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LIU offense vs TOW defense
Offense 339th of 366 against a defense 113th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LIU has played the 290th-hardest schedule, TOW the 140th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
LIU hits 35.8% and allows 32.2%; TOW hits 29.4% and allows 30.9%. Threes are 29.3% and 34.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIU 33.9%, TOW 36.0%. Defensive: LIU 67.0%, TOW 70.9%
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIU 52.8 and allows 50.0; TOW 46.5 and allows 48.5
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: LIU plays 68.5 a game (206th fastest), TOW 64.0 (360th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
TOW at home. This season: TOW 0-0 at home, LIU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIU 6%, TOW 27%. Transfers in: LIU 6, TOW 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
TOW offense vs LIU defense
Offense 266th of 366 against a defense 283rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIU 34.0, TOW 30.4. Allowed: LIU 34.7, TOW 29.3
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIU 19.0%, TOW 15.8%. Forced: LIU 18.7%, TOW 15.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TOW -10.6 | — |
| Total | — | 137.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIU 63.6 · TOW 74.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TOW -6.2 | — |
| 1H total | 64.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIU 29.2 · TOW 35.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LIU 0–2 TOWTOW leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · TOW has won the last 2 meetings · LIU 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2022-23 | TOW 74 @ LIU 64 | LIU +19.5 | LIU W |
| Dec 2, 2021-22 | LIU 63 @ TOW 72 | TOW -11 | LIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Long Island
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
17-18
49% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 67-89 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 94-90 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 185.5 | U 184 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 76-72 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 88-79 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 53-69 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-98 | +34.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 75-61 | +4.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 92-94 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 87-82 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 70-60 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 83-87 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 79-86 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 74-89 | +30.5 | W +15.5 | 179.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 84-78 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 74-55 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 60-58 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-63 | -15.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 66-59 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 77-83 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 66-63 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-61 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-59 | -2.5 | W +18.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 60-55 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-54 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 67-57 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 52-55 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 129.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-65 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 91-89 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-91 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 73-56 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-60 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 79-75 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 64-56 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 79-70 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 58-92 | +30.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ND
L 67-89
−6.5
6
@
IUIN
W 94-90
+8.5
11
@
AF
W 76-72
−1.5
15
vs
JMU
W 88-79
+5.5
20
@
FOR
L 53-69
−11.5
22
@
ILL
L 58-98
−5.5
24
@
MOST
W 75-61
+18.5
2
vs
WIN
L 92-94
+3.5
6
@
LEH
W 87-82
+3.5
13
vs
LAS
W 70-60
+7.5
16
@
MSST
L 83-87
+12.5
20
@
FIU
L 79-86
−0.5
29
@
UGA
L 74-89
+15.5
2
vs
CCSU
W 84-78
−0.5
4
@
CHST
W 74-55
+11.5
8
vs
MERC
W 60-58
−6.5
10
vs
SFPA
W 67-63
−11.5
17
@
FDU
W 66-59
−0.5
19
@
LEM
L 77-83
−7.5
23
@
STO
W 66-63
−2.5
29
vs
LEM
W 83-61
+13.5
31
@
CCSU
W 80-59
+18.5
5
vs
NHVN
W 60-55
−4.5
7
vs
STO
W 61-54
−3.5
12
@
WAG
W 67-57
+3.5
14
@
NHVN
L 52-55
−9.5
16
vs
WAG
W 83-65
+7.5
19
@
SFPA
W 91-89
−7.5
21
@
MERC
L 83-91
−11.5
26
vs
CHST
W 73-56
+5.5
28
vs
FDU
W 74-60
+4.5
4
vs
CHST
W 79-75
−6.5
7
vs
WAG
W 64-56
+1.5
10
vs
MERC
W 79-70
+4.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 58-92
−3.5
covered 17didn’t cover 18avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ND
L 67-89
+20.5
6
@
IUIN
W 94-90
−1.5
11
@
AF
W 76-72
+10.5
15
vs
JMU
W 88-79
+19.5
20
@
FOR
L 53-69
−23.5
22
@
ILL
L 58-98
−4.5
24
@
MOST
W 75-61
−9.5
2
vs
WIN
L 92-94
+32.5
6
@
LEH
W 87-82
+26.5
13
vs
LAS
W 70-60
−13.5
16
@
MSST
L 83-87
+17.5
20
@
FIU
L 79-86
+3.5
29
@
UGA
L 74-89
−16.5
2
vs
CCSU
W 84-78
+15.5
4
@
CHST
W 74-55
−22.5
8
vs
MERC
W 60-58
−21.5
10
vs
SFPA
W 67-63
−18.5
17
@
FDU
W 66-59
−18.5
19
@
LEM
L 77-83
+9.5
23
@
STO
W 66-63
−8.5
29
vs
LEM
W 83-61
−3.5
31
@
CCSU
W 80-59
−3.5
5
vs
NHVN
W 60-55
−20.5
7
vs
STO
W 61-54
−17.5
12
@
WAG
W 67-57
−11.5
14
@
NHVN
L 52-55
−22.5
16
vs
WAG
W 83-65
+9.5
19
@
SFPA
W 91-89
+31.5
21
@
MERC
L 83-91
+33.5
26
vs
CHST
W 73-56
−12.5
28
vs
FDU
W 74-60
−3.5
4
vs
CHST
W 79-75
+16.5
7
vs
WAG
W 64-56
−18.5
10
vs
MERC
W 79-70
+14.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 58-92
+2.5
over 15under 20avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Towson
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-56 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 48-65 | +26.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 51-41 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 75-81 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 62-55 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 73-87 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-80 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 61-86 | +9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 49-73 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 70-84 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 62-63 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 48-62 | -8.5 | L −22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 67-78 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 87-78 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 61-52 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 59-58 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 72-59 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 73-82 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 82-50 | -8.5 | W +23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-71 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-57 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 62-68 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 58-56 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-67 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 69-57 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-68 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 81-56 | +3.5 | W +28.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 65-68 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
+2.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
+9.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−3.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
−9.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
+9.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+9.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
−12.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+6.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−15.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−9.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
+11.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−12.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−22.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
−12.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+6.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
+5.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−6.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
+14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
−14.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
−10.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+23.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
+4.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+0.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−8.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−3.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−0.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
+10.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
−1.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
+28.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
−18.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
−17.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−46.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
+15.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
−23.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+3.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
+21.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+18.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−1.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−15.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
−26.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−3.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−11.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−26.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
+10.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+21.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
−30.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−7.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
−14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
+13.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
+19.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+0.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
−9.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+4.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−0.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−30.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−4.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
−11.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
+9.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
−1.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+0.5
over 12under 20avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Towson has the better starters
Position by position: Long Island 0, Towson 2, even 3
Long IslandBetterTowson
G J. Pickett TR5.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 2
→TOWBig
G B. Roseborough TR11.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 50
G K. Jones TR4.4 pts · 1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 13
→TOWBig
G J. Womack6.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 61
G D. Davis TR0.7 pts · 0.3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Ndefo2.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 32
G D. Jean-Charles TR0.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Embeya3.5 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
F J. Johnson TR6.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 33
=Even
F D. Badalau TR3.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
Long IslandBetterTowson
LIU offense339th of 366 · -11.1
→TOWBig
TOW defense113th of 366 · -1.4
LIU defense283rd of 366 · -7.1
=Even
TOW offense266th of 366 · -8.1
Backcourt-6.7 · 4 players
→TOWBig
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
Bench-1.6 · 3 players
→TOWSmall
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestLIU betterTOW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Pickett27 min · TRK. Jones11 min · TRD. Davis9 min · TRD. Jean-Charles9 min · TRM. Ndlovu-Fraser8 minV. AlletteNew
Forwards
J. Johnson15 min · TRJ. Howard7 min · TRX. Li4 minM. BewleyNewR. BewleyNewT. BowlesNew
Guards
B. Roseborough28 min · TRJ. Womack19 minC. Ndefo12 minZ. Stanford5 min · TRR. Skerry2 minC. DoerrNew
Forwards
C. Embeya21 minD. Badalau13 min · TRA. AtkinsonNewB. HolmesNewD. KirkNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.6 #214 | Points per game | 67.1 #332 |
| 1.08 #185 | Points per possession | 1.05 #256 |
| 68.5 #206 | Pace (possessions) | 64.0 #360 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.8 #112 | Effective FG% | 46.5 #345 |
| 35.8 #67 | 3-point % | 29.4 #349 |
| 29.3 #354 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.9 #277 |
| 34.0 #207 | Free throw rate | 30.4 #299 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.0 #320 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #128 |
| 33.9 #70 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #24 |
| 13.7 #170 | Assists per game | 9.5 #364 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.7 #99 | Points allowed | 66.4 #18 |
| 1.04 #80 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #73 |
| 50.0 #102 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.5 #49 |
| 32.2 #72 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.9 #33 |
| 18.7 #61 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #271 |
| 67.0 #299 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #117 |
| 7.8 #56 | Steals per game | 5.8 #253 |
| 5.4 #9 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #175 |
Long Island
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 18-3 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona58–92
- Wvs Mercyhurst79–70
- Wvs Wagner64–56
- Wvs Chicago St79–75
- Wvs FDU74–60
A week or more of rest.
Towson
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra65–68
- Wvs Charleston81–56
- Wvs Hampton74–68
- W@ Stony Brook69–57
- Wvs Campbell71–67
A week or more of rest.