SECU Arena · at Towson
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TOW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TOW 80–65 · win probability TOW 91%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TOW has more of the edges
MORG 0, TOW 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
MORG has played the 360th-hardest schedule, TOW the 140th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MORG 30.7%, TOW 36.0%. Defensive: MORG 64.8%, TOW 70.9%
MORG offense vs TOW defense
Offense 293rd of 366 against a defense 113th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MORG plays 71.1 a game (73rd fastest), TOW 64.0 (360th). Faster games mean more points
TOW offense vs MORG defense
Offense 266th of 366 against a defense 360th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MORG 45.8 and allows 51.7; TOW 46.5 and allows 48.5
Home court
TOW at home. This season: TOW 0-0 at home, MORG 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MORG 17.8%, TOW 15.8%. Forced: MORG 16.5%, TOW 15.1%
Even
Three-pointers
MORG hits 31.7% and allows 31.5%; TOW hits 29.4% and allows 30.9%. Threes are 35.2% and 34.9% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MORG 42.7, TOW 30.4. Allowed: MORG 50.9, TOW 29.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MORG 36%, TOW 27%. Transfers in: MORG 3, TOW 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TOW -15.3 | — |
| Total | — | 145.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | MORG 64.9 · TOW 80.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TOW -9.0 | — |
| 1H total | 67.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | MORG 29.4 · TOW 38.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MORG 0–2 TOWTOW leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · TOW has won the last 2 meetings · MORG 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2024-25 | TOW 64 @ MORG 60 | MORG +10.5 | MORG W |
| Nov 26, 2023-24 | MORG 58 @ TOW 67 | TOW -12.5 | MORG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Morgan St
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-87 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 73-79 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-88 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 66-71 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 80-84 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 49-92 | +21.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 50-97 | +26.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-94 | +25.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 56-83 | +23.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 49-66 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 78-89 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-79 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-77 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 79-78 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-80 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 76-80 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-83 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 59-84 | +8.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-84 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+10.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
−7.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−3.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−20.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
+0.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+1.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−21.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+6.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−20.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
−4.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−3.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−10.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
+0.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
−7.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+4.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+15.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+8.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+5.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+1.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+8.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+5.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−16.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+9.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−1.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+2.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
−2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
+11.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−9.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−12.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
−6.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+9.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−9.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+13.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−4.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
+12.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−5.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−23.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
−8.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
+25.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+22.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+6.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+4.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+13.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+9.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+6.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+19.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−15.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+17.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−13.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
+2.5
over 16under 11avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Towson
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-56 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 48-65 | +26.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 51-41 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 75-81 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 62-55 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 73-87 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-80 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 61-86 | +9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 49-73 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 70-84 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 62-63 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 48-62 | -8.5 | L −22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 67-78 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 87-78 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 61-52 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 59-58 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 72-59 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 73-82 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 82-50 | -8.5 | W +23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-71 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-57 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 62-68 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 58-56 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-67 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 69-57 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-68 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 81-56 | +3.5 | W +28.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 65-68 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
+2.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
+9.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−3.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
−9.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
+9.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+9.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
−12.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+6.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−15.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−9.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
+11.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−12.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−22.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
−12.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+6.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
+5.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−6.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
+14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
−14.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
−10.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+23.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
+4.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+0.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−8.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−3.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−0.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
+10.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
−1.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
+28.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
−18.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
−17.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−46.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
+15.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
−23.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+3.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
+21.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+18.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−1.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−15.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
−26.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−3.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−11.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−26.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
+10.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+21.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
−30.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−7.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
−14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
+13.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
+19.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+0.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
−9.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+4.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−0.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−30.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−4.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
−11.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
+9.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
−1.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+0.5
over 12under 20avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Towson has the better starters
Position by position: Morgan St 1, Towson 2, even 2
Morgan StBetterTowson
G A. Worrell16.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 70
←MORGSmall
G B. Roseborough TR11.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 50
G J. Awoke TR6.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 12
→TOWBig
G J. Womack6.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 61
G D. Bumpass2.7 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Ndefo2.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 32
F K. Horton TR7.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
→TOWSmall
F C. Embeya3.5 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
F T. Edwards3.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Badalau TR3.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
Morgan StBetterTowson
MORG offense293rd of 366 · -9.1
→TOWBig
TOW defense113th of 366 · -1.4
MORG defense360th of 366 · -11.0
→TOWSmall
TOW offense266th of 366 · -8.1
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
→TOWSmall
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.7 · 2 players
→TOWSmall
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
→TOWSmall
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestMORG betterTOW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Worrell30 minJ. Awoke25 min · TRD. Bumpass9 minB. Barnett2 minJ. KwartengNewK. RichardNew
Forwards
K. Horton20 min · TRT. Edwards17 minM. Wade8 minM. Lual7 minI. Traore6 min · TRT. PettigrewNew
Guards
B. Roseborough28 min · TRJ. Womack19 minC. Ndefo12 minZ. Stanford5 min · TRR. Skerry2 minC. DoerrNew
Forwards
C. Embeya21 minD. Badalau13 min · TRA. AtkinsonNewB. HolmesNewD. KirkNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.7 #252 | Points per game | 67.1 #332 |
| 1.01 #316 | Points per possession | 1.05 #256 |
| 71.1 #73 | Pace (possessions) | 64.0 #360 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.8 #351 | Effective FG% | 46.5 #345 |
| 31.7 #295 | 3-point % | 29.4 #349 |
| 35.2 #274 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.9 #277 |
| 42.7 #22 | Free throw rate | 30.4 #299 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #262 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #128 |
| 30.7 #172 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #24 |
| 12.2 #269 | Assists per game | 9.5 #364 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.1 #321 | Points allowed | 66.4 #18 |
| 1.13 #288 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #73 |
| 51.7 #194 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.5 #49 |
| 31.5 #43 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.9 #33 |
| 16.5 #186 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #271 |
| 64.8 #341 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #117 |
| 4.3 #359 | Steals per game | 5.8 #253 |
| 3.3 #172 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #175 |
Morgan St
11-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-5 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Delaware St70–75
- Wvs Coppin St70–66
- Wvs Norfolk St90–84
- Lvs Howard59–84
- W@ SC State90–83
A week or more of rest.
Towson
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra65–68
- Wvs Charleston81–56
- Wvs Hampton74–68
- W@ Stony Brook69–57
- Wvs Campbell71–67
A week or more of rest.