KeyBank Center · Neutral site · NCAA Tournament
Closing line
UGA -1.5✓ SLU covered by 26.5
Closing total167.5Over by 11.5
| This season | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-5 | Record | 22-10 |
| 19-13 | ATS | 16-16 |
| 15-17 | O/U | 17-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SLU 83–88 UGA · ✗ UGA (66%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLU | 49 | 53 | 102 |
| UGA | 32 | 45 | 77 |
1st half: SLU 49, UGA 32 (SLU by 17). The model had UGA by 2.7 and a total of 79.5 (actual 81).
Team stats
| SLU | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 42-72 58% | Field goals | 25-72 35% |
| 9-28 32% | 3-pointers | 10-39 26% |
| 9-11 82% | Free throws | 17-26 65% |
| 47 11 off | Rebounds | 36 15 off |
| 27 | Assists | 9 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 6 | Blocks | 4 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 20 | Fouls | 14 |
| 66 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| SLU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robbie Avila C | 28 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 4-6 | 1-2 |
| Amari McCottry G | 27 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-0 |
| Quentin Jones G | 26 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4-10 | 1-4 |
| Trey Green G | 25 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3-7 | 1-5 |
| Dion Brown G | 22 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 9-10 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ishan Sharma F | 22 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-6 |
| Brady Dunlap F | 17 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 4-7 | 3-6 |
| Kellen Thames G | 14 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-1 |
| Paul Otieno F | 11 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Cam Hutson G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Jax Kerr F | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Schertz G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Isaac Holmes G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Luke Laczkowski, Badara Diakite, Kalu Anya, Dylan Warlick
| UGA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Millender G | 30 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 5-15 | 2-8 |
| Blue Cain G | 23 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-4 |
| Kareem Stagg F | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 |
| Kanon Catchings F | 18 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-11 | 0-5 |
| Somto Cyril C | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jeremiah Wilkinson G | 29 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 9-21 | 7-15 |
| Jordan Ross G | 19 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Dylan James F | 17 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Justin Abson F | 13 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Justin Bailey G | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Jake Wilkins F | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Markel Jennings, Jackson McVey, Jaden Newell, Brandon Klatsky
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUGA -1.5
ModelUGA -4.8
Model edgeUGA +3.3
L SLU covered
Total
Market167.5
Model170.4
Model edgeOver 2.9
W Over
Projected score
SLU 82.8 · UGA 87.6
SLU 102 · UGA 77
Win probability
UGA 66%
1st half
Spread
UGA -2.7
SLU -17.0
Total
79.5
81 points
Projected score
SLU 38.4 · UGA 41.1
SLU 49 · UGA 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUGA -1.5
no move
CloseUGA -1.5
No change since the open
Total
Open171.5
▼ 4
Close167.5
Down 4 since the open
Moneyline
SLU +110 · UGA -130
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UGA -1.5 · unchangedmodel UGA -5
model UGA -5
Opened 171.5 · closed 167.5 · moved 4 downmodel 170.5
model 170.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Louis
32 games played
Straight up
27-5
84% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-67 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 108-86 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 109-66 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -19.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 71-70 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 77-78 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 91-70 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 107-65 | -24.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-75 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 112-53 | -26.5 | W +32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 93-79 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 102-79 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-72 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 78-56 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-63 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 97-62 | -8.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 102-71 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 91-82 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-58 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 86-59 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-77 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-76 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 79-65 | -21.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-86 | -7.5 | L −36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 88-81 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
−8.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+18.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
+5.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
+11.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−0.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−2.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+13.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+17.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
−2.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+32.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
−20.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+3.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
+10.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
−5.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
+4.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
+10.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−4.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
+26.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−7.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
+1.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
+9.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
+5.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+1.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−7.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−36.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+0.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−5.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
+38.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+9.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
−25.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
−15.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−17.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−5.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+10.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+11.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
+4.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+7.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
+14.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+19.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
−38.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
+3.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
−20.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
−11.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−7.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
−0.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−12.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+21.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
−13.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
−10.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
+5.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
−1.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+6.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−11.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−3.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+10.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−6.5
over 15under 17avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Georgia
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 104-59 | -23.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 5 | vs | W 94-29 | -33.5 | W +31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 120-81 | -28.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 92-87 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-57 | -40.5 | L −10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 94-97 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 123-81 | -34.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 107-73 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-65 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 112-82 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-74 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-74 | -30.5 | L −15.5 | 179.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 77-92 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-70 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 95-97 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-76 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-87 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-92 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-71 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-86 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-94 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 86-78 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-80 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 80-88 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 87-68 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 98-88 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 102-96 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 72-76 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+21.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
+31.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+10.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
−10.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−9.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
−1.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+7.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+35.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
+13.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
−2.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
−7.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−15.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
−2.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−5.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
+0.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
−12.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
+11.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
+3.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−16.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+0.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−19.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
+10.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−11.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
−14.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+14.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
−0.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
+6.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+11.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+0.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+12.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
−19.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+50.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
+23.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−26.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−10.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
+38.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+43.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+3.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
−8.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
+26.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
+3.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−16.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
+30.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−3.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
−18.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
+33.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
−15.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
−17.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−14.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+13.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−4.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
−7.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−12.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
+7.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+2.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
+4.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
−3.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+6.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+30.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−8.5
over 17under 15avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Saint Louis
27-5 overall · 16-4 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton69–70
- Wvs G Washington88–81
- L@ George Mason57–86
- Wvs Loyola Chicago79–65
- Wvs Duquesne91–76
5 days since their last game.
Georgia
22-10 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Ole Miss72–76
- W@ Mississippi St102–96
- Wvs Alabama98–88
- Wvs South Carolina87–68
- L@ Vanderbilt80–88
A week or more of rest.