Fiserv Forum · at Bucks
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 1-5 |
| 4-2 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 4-2 | O/U | 5-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NO 120–116 · win probability NO 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 236.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NO has more of the edges
NO 5, MIL 2 · 2026-27 so far
NO offense vs MIL defense
Offense 13th of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NO 35.3, MIL 23.9. Allowed: NO 30.6, MIL 29.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: NO 55.1 and allows 54.2; MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NO 24.3%, MIL 29.7%. Defensive: NO 76.4%, MIL 74.2%
Recent form
Last 5: NO 4-1 ATS, margin +2.8; MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NO 17.4%, MIL 15.8%. Forced: NO 16.3%, MIL 12.2%
Context
Schedule so far
NO has played the 28th-hardest schedule, MIL the 23rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MIL at home. This season: MIL 1-3 at home, NO 0-2 away
Even
Three-pointers
NO hits 31.2% and allows 30.5%; MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 32.8% and 45.9% of their shots
Even
MIL offense vs NO defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 24th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: NO plays 108.0 a game (2nd fastest), MIL 106.2 (4th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NO 100%, MIL 100%. Transfers in: NO 0, MIL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelNO -4.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model236.4
Model edge—
Projected score
NO 120.2 · MIL 116.2
Win probability
NO 61%
1st half
Spread
NO -2.4
Total
118.1
Projected score
NO 60.3 · MIL 57.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% | |
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
NO 2–8 MILMIL leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · MIL has won the last 4 meetings · NO 3-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025-26 | MIL 139 @ NO 118 | NO -4.5 | MIL W |
| Feb 4, 2025-26 | NO 137 @ MIL 141 | MIL +4.5 | MIL W |
| Apr 10, 2024-25 | NO 111 @ MIL 136 | MIL -16.5 | MIL W |
| Apr 6, 2024-25 | MIL 111 @ NO 107 | NO +6.5 | NO W |
| Mar 28, 2023-24 | MIL 100 @ NO 107 | NO +2.5 | NO W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Pelicans
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-2
67% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
−0.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+5.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−8.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+5.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
+27.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
+4.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+36.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−46.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+17.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
−19.5
over 4under 2avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Pelicans has the better starters
Position by position: Pelicans 4, Bucks 0, even 1
PelicansBetterBucks
G D. Murray17.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 6 ast
Score 45
←NOBig
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
G J. Fears13 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 19
←NOSmall
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
F Z. Williamson20.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 81
←NOSmall
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
F H. Jones6.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
←NOBig
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
C D. Jordan6 pts · 6.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 52
=Even
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
PelicansBetterBucks
NO offense13th of 30 · +1.1
←NOBig
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
NO defense24th of 30 · -3.7
=Even
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
←NOBig
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+15.7 · 3 players
←NOBig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
Bench-16.0 · 5 players
→MILBig
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNO betterMIL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Murray32 minJ. Fears25 minS. Bey25 minB. McGowens21 minB. Mathurin18 minA. Johnson10 min
Forwards
Z. Williamson32 minH. Jones21 minJ. Reese31 minT. Watford18 minK. Matkovic16 min
Centers
D. Jordan17 minD. Queen24 min
Out
J. PooleOutT. MurphyDay-To-DayY. MissiOut
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 119.7 #7 | Points per game | 113.0 #17 |
| 1.10 #15 | Points per possession | 1.07 #20 |
| 108.0 #2 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #4 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.1 #9 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #21 |
| 31.2 #25 | 3-point % | 33.9 #21 |
| 32.8 #30 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #8 |
| 35.3 #4 | Free throw rate | 23.9 #25 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #26 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #18 |
| 24.3 #25 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.7 #8 |
| 25.5 #21 | Assists per game | 26.0 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 117.8 #24 | Points allowed | 126.2 #28 |
| 1.09 #16 | Points allowed per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 54.2 #21 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.4 #24 |
| 30.5 #5 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #14 |
| 16.3 #10 | Turnovers forced | 12.2 #30 |
| 76.4 #6 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.2 #10 |
| 13.7 #1 | Steals per game | 5.7 #30 |
| 4.8 #16 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #27 |
Pelicans
2-4 overall · 1-3 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Hawks121–99
- Wvs Kings132–120
- Lvs Nuggets91–104
- L@ Nuggets135–141
- L@ Jazz119–120
A week or more of rest.
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.